Sentences with phrase «price purchase because»

Not exact matches

We move through the world feeling in control of our actions; and the decision to purchase something is no different: We think we bought that new product because it had the best features, the best price or the best look.

Service fees are critical because you when account for them, you could be paying well over the purchase price by the time you're done with your installments.

Dube began to see that cutting just $ 1 or $ 2 from the price of each item could increase the company's overall margins significantly, because it purchases thousands of items from vendors every year.

But Corcoran, who thinks of money generally as there «to be spent,» doesn't just regret the purchase because of the price tag.

Because the central bank's purchases represent increased demand, it tends to push up government bond prices, thus lowering yields.

Although the terms of the Knowingly purchase haven't been made public, sources who looked into buying some or all of the assets said the initial price for the editorial part of the company was $ 6 million, but eventually that was reduced to $ 1 million, and still many bidders backed out — in part because the editorial staff had all been let go.

Because PE is a measure of earnings over time, you can think of it as representing the number of years required to pay back a stock's purchase price (ignoring inflation, earnings growth and the time value of money).

Because selling a home is expensive and time - consuming, and price gains are uneven, it's best to see a home purchase as a commitment for 10 years or longer, many experts say.

Investors love warrants because they offer an extra chance to share in a company's upside potential — in cases in which the warrant is exercisable at a preset purchase price that turns out to be less than the stock's market value.

In China, where overcrowding is common, whole cities have been erected within the span of months, then left abandoned because of developers» bankruptcies and high purchase prices.

If you purchase directly from the government, you must place bids for the bonds you want — these are noncompetitive bids because you know and agree to the price you will be paying.

Bubbles typically occur when investors purchase assets with the expectation of short - term gains because of rapidly rising prices.

The reason there is scarity in homes available for sales is because the ones that are able to keep their homes need more equity to purchase a more over priced home.

According to a new study by UPS and ComScore, because they get frustrated when the cost of shipping exceeded their expectations for the price of the merchandise they were purchasing.

Certainly, it can not withstand high prices for a combination of necessary resources, because people need to cut back on other purchases, in order to afford the necessities whose prices are rising.

They may become a customer, but you never recoup the costs of acquiring them because of a low average sale price, their propensity to churn, or their unlikeliness to purchase again from your company.

Unlike funds that are managed, indexed funds are managed passively and because there is no more risk when purchasing them then other funds, they are more likely a better investment, just based on price alone, as you can own more for less money.

Because the platform is also used by major financial institutions — including Bank of America Merrill Lynch — the combined purchasing volume means we're able to offer some of the most competitive prices anywhere in the world.

I can, though, see where Zillow is coming from: no one thinks the North American real estate market is the way it is because that is somehow optimal or good for consumers; the only folks that benefit from the status quo are real estate agents that continue to collect 6 % of the purchase price even as their responsibilities, particularly in the case of the buying agent, run in the opposite direction of their incentives.

Basic premise (aging terribly, so thank heavens the details are behind a paywall): lower gas prices aren't really stimulative in Canada because the concurrent decline in the terms of trade is detrimental to gross domestic income, thereby crimping purchasing power, and is likely accompanied by a hit to employment (wrong again, so far!).

They are reluctant to sell below the purchase price because that means losing.

This is a noteworthy feature, because PMI is typically required on home loans that account for more than 80 % of the purchase price.

As the U.S. dollar rises the general trend in commodity prices denominated in U.S. dollars is downwards because they cost more when purchased with other currencies.

SEO is important these days mostly because smart consumers don't shop the way they used to, by going from store to store to compare prices before they purchase what they want or need.

Because silver is a potential investment available to all the world's investors, any public suggestion that its price was artificially depressed could very easily translate into investors purchasing it.

Those who are purchasing bonds like dropping bond prices because it means that they can get higher yields.

In part, this is because mortgage lenders determine your maximum home purchase price differently from how you might calculate it yourself via a mortgage calculator.

That's because while buyers don't have to make a traditional down payment, they do have to pay the difference between your loan balance and the purchase price of the house.

Now, falling prices might seem like a good thing, but when prices are continually dropped, consumers «put off» making big purchases because prices will be lower in the future.

That makes because many people borrowed on their home equity (to make home improvements, big purchases, or invest in another property) when the housing market was doing well, and then they got stuck holding the bag when housing prices fell.

But within series B, since different investors have different caps (based on their purchase price), they would theoretically / mathematically hit their caps at different valuations.This most probably happens because of the excess amount left over after Series A hits its cap.

Now is the time for me to post on Yamana (by this weekend, I pray) because it is at a price $ 7.33 that I have purchased in the past and it may be a reasonable choice for a BASKET of miners.

This is confusing because what is meant by PPP GDP is that a country's purchasing power is compared with that of USA based on the prices prevailing in the two respective countries.

Concerns have been raised that foreign investment is a key factor behind skyrocketing home prices, but data to study such claims are lacking because foreign purchases of real estate have not been officially tracked.

This is because every time you renew, you're essentially purchasing a new policy that's priced according to your current age, so the premiums will continue increase.

«The later stages of the 2009 — 2017 bull market are a valuation illusion built on share buyback alchemy... The technique optically reduces the price - to - earnings multiple because the denominator doesn't adjust for the reduced share count... Share buybacks are a major contributor to the low volatility regime because a large price insensitive buyer is always ready to purchase the market on weakness... Share buybacks result in a lower volatility, lower liquidity, which in turn incentivizes more share buybacks, further incentivizing passive and systematic strategies that are short volatility in all their forms... Like a snake eating its own tail, the market can not rely on share buybacks indefinitely to nourish the illusion of growth.

However, because assessed values rise to the purchase price when a home is sold, new homeowners can expect to pay higher rates than that.

As I said then, I'm bullish because the purchasing manager's index (PMI) is up and oil prices are down, thanks to the ingenuity of Texas fracking, which has created a global peace tax break.

As many loyal readers are well aware, we closely monitor the global purchasing manager's index (PMI) because, as our research has shown, when the one - month reading has fallen below the three - month moving average, select commodity prices have receded six months later.

She should be made to pay the artist the purchase price of the piece at the very least and spend a brief time in jail because she could have hurt someone by swinging a crowbar around in a musuem.

I purchased this because the price of Vanilla Extract has skyrocketed in the past two years.

This is because they move a high volume of product, selling it to customers who aren't concerned with price point and make wine purchases based on reviews and ratings.

I did not purchase the fermenting crock because the price is too high for me, and I gave up.

It's also nice to see that if someone is vegetarian or unable to purchase chicken regularly because of the price, there are other protein rich food options out there.

In England «penny universities» sprang up, so called because for the price of a penny one could purchase a cup of coffee and engage in stimulating conversation.

If fresh milk access is at risk because of unsustainable pricing in part of Australia - as we understand it there are multiple brands on offer, some more expensive than others - consumers can determine their own welfare simply through what they purchase at the store.

This ruling, if it happens, could mean inflated prices for English players or players being purchased to play bit parts because of their nationality, used rarely as subs but sitting on the bench for most of the year.

By the way you mention players» prices versus players» wages which I think is incomparable because the one is a wage price while the other is a purchasing price which has no correlation whatsoever, and their retrospective prices are dictated by their very own respective terms and reasons.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Because there is no option in the deal for a purchase by Milan, he will return to Chelsea however there is a chance he does stay for another loan spell or Galliani will look to corral the player on a permanent deal if the price is right.