The current oil
price scenarios appear to have not calculated this in however, as all media is focused on the effects of hurricane Harvey and the Gulf of Mexico.
Not exact matches
Scenarios I & II: Note the net $ 41 M of assets & liabilities held for sale
appears broadly equivalent to the announced $ 60 M Osage deal
price (on a PV basis).
I bought at a time when it
appeared to me Mr. Market was valuing the company based on a worst case
scenario, at a fire sale
price.
A functioning market would make this more apparent (e.g., if the market
price is equal to the IPCC midpoint
scenario), of course, but it
appears to me that in the debate motivated by James so far that there is no expectation that emissions reductions policies will have a discernable effect on the climate (as measured by GAT) by 2030 (the terminal point of the bet).