The primary basis for this conclusion was the 2011 decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Corlac Inc v Weatherford Canada Inc., 2011 FCA 228 which in the relevant portion focused on statements made by an applicant to the patent office during prosecution.
Not exact matches
That graph is the
primary basis for the argument
for capping scientists at a three research grant maximum (or less, see below)[1,3]
based on the
conclusion that the graph shows «strong evidence of diminishing returns» [2].
In
conclusion, the fact that secondary students are often placed in different tracks or groupings
based on various factors such as students» previous academic records means that the way value - added evaluations function is different than is the case
for primary students, who are usually grouped heterogeneously.