First, he distinguishes from classical empiricism a revisionary description
of experience according to which sense
perception is neither the only nor even the
primary mode of experience, but is rather derived from a still more elemental awareness both
of ourselves and
of the world around us» (PP 78).6 On Ogden's analysis, both the classical and this first type
of revisionary empiricism «assume that the sole realities present in our experience, and therefore the only objects
of our certain knowledge, are ourselves and the other creatures that constitute the world» (PP 79) 7 With these «two more conventional types
of empiricism» he contrasts a «comprehensive» type
of revisionary empiricism distinguished from them by its consideration
of the possibility (and then also by its claim) that the internal awareness it asserts together with the former revisionary type is «the awareness not merely
of ourselves, and
of our fellow creatures, but also
of the infinite whole in which we are all included as somehow one» (PP 87, 80, 85).
I have just sketched the outlines
of an aesthetic cosmology indicating how each
of us is tied into the cosmos through the
mode of primary perception.