Sentences with phrase «primary outcome of life»

Weinstock and colleagues looked for a primary outcome of life - threatening arrhythmia, inpatient heart attack, cardiac or respiratory arrest, or death.

Not exact matches

The primary outcome was to evaluate if L reuteri DSM 17938 supplementation from the first days of life can reduce inconsolable crying, improve regurgitation, and modify bowel movements in neonates during the first 3 months of life.

Table 1 gives the prevalence of primary outcomes and exposures in the first year of life.

BHA Head of Public Affairs Pavan Dhaliwal commented, «We are concerned that the outcome of this consultation is that pupils living further away from Tudor Grange Academy will get priority over those living closer because they attend St James primary.

The primary outcome was ADL score after three months and secondary outcomes were quality of life ratings.

We set out to test whether, compared with placebo, supplementation would increase fat - free mass (FFM) 10 (primary outcome) while improving strength, nutritional status, inflammation, and measures of quality of life and physical function (secondary outcomes).

We have long known that collaboration between primary care veterinarians and board certified cardiologists for patients with heart disease results in a better outcome for patients and improved quality of life.

This is the first demonstration that depression and quality - of - life outcomes can be improved through a quality improvement intervention for depressed adolescents in primary care settings.

The primary outcome measure for parents will be quality of life.

Discrete - time survival analysis, with person - year the unit of analysis and a logistic link function, was used to examine associations of temporally primary (based on retrospective age - at - onset reports) mental disorders and subsequent first onset of suicidality.29 Time was modeled as a separate dummy predictor variable for each year of life up to age at interview or age at onset of the outcome, whichever came first.

Five self - report questionnaires will be used at baseline and, except for the sociodemographic variables, after the intervention is completed (12, 18 and 24 months later) to evaluate the short - term and long - term effects of the intervention on primary (health) and secondary (social participation, life satisfaction and healthcare services utilisation) outcomes and to describe the participants (table 1).

Primary outcomes are quality of life and anxious and depressive symptoms; secondary outcomes are stress and basic psychological needs.

The primary outcome measured at 12 and 26 weeks follow - up was depressive symptoms on the Beck Depression Inventory 2nd edition (BDI - II).26 Social functioning on the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) 27 and quality of life on the EuroQol Five - item, Five - level (EQ - 5D - 5L) Scale28 were also measured at 12 and 26 weeks follow - up.

Primary outcome measures are: carer preparedness measured by the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale28 and carer distress measured by the Distress Thermometer (DT).29, 30 Secondary outcome measures are carer anxiety and depression measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), 31 carer quality of life measured by the Caregiver Quality of Life Index — Cancer, 32 carer competence measured by the Carer Competence Scale, 33 carer supportive care needs measured by the «Partner and Caregivers Supportive Care Needs Scale ’34 and «Brain Tumour Specific Supportive Carer Needs for Carers Survey ’35 and health economic cost - consequences measured using a checklist of services ulife measured by the Caregiver Quality of Life Index — Cancer, 32 carer competence measured by the Carer Competence Scale, 33 carer supportive care needs measured by the «Partner and Caregivers Supportive Care Needs Scale ’34 and «Brain Tumour Specific Supportive Carer Needs for Carers Survey ’35 and health economic cost - consequences measured using a checklist of services uLife Index — Cancer, 32 carer competence measured by the Carer Competence Scale, 33 carer supportive care needs measured by the «Partner and Caregivers Supportive Care Needs Scale ’34 and «Brain Tumour Specific Supportive Carer Needs for Carers Survey ’35 and health economic cost - consequences measured using a checklist of services used.

We plan to: (a) identify high risk adolescents based on elevated scores on a screening measure of depressive symptoms that is delivered in primary care; (b) recruit 400 (200 per site) of these at - risk adolescents to be randomized into either the CATCH - IT or the Educational group; and (c) assess outcomes at 2, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post intake on measures of depressive symptoms, depressive diagnoses, other mental disorders, and on measures of role impairment in education, quality of life, attainment of educational milestones, and family functioning; and to examine predictors of intervention response, and potential ethnic and cultural differences in intervention response.

Primary outcome; Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG, HbA1C) and Secondary outcome; Quality of life scale.

This review will consider studies that include the following outcome measures: the primary outcome is preventing progression to psychosis (incidences of sub threshold psychosis and first - episode psychosis), the secondary outcomes such as symptoms of psychosis (both positive and negative symptoms), psychosocial functioning, depression, anxiety and quality of life.

The primary outcome was the self - perceived health status of the adolescents, as measured with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)[23, 24].

This article includes analysis of cross-sectional associations between T1D outcomes (adherence, glycemic control, quality of life, family conflict, depression, and self - efficacy) and scores on the Collaborative Parent Involvement (CPI) Scale obtained from 309 youths with T1D about their primary and secondary caregivers.