Instruments with established construct validity and reliability were used to measure
the primary outcomes of the study.
The authors judged the quality of evidence for
the primary outcomes of this review to be low.
The primary outcomes of both trials are safety (adverse events) tolerability, and a wide array of pharmacokinetic outcomes (which are curiously designated as safety issues).
This update of the review considered the evidence of the effect of breastfeeding support interventions on
primary outcomes of stopping any or exclusive breastfeeding before four to six weeks and at up to six months postpartum.
«After a quick stint in bankruptcy,
the primary outcome of which was a balance - sheet cleansing and the installation of new management and Board, we think GM offers...
Secondly, we used propensity score methods to explore more fully the effect on
the primary outcome of imbalances in the baseline characteristics of women in different birth settings (see appendix 6 on bmj.com).15
Main outcome measure A composite
primary outcome of perinatal mortality and intrapartum related neonatal morbidities (stillbirth after start of care in labour, early neonatal death, neonatal encephalopathy, meconium aspiration syndrome, brachial plexus injury, fractured humerus, or fractured clavicle) was used to compare outcomes by planned place of birth at the start of care in labour (at home, freestanding midwifery units, alongside midwifery units, and obstetric units).
A late - breaking clinical trial, known as the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial, to be presented at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions, November 18, 2013, demonstrates that spironolactone did not reduce
the primary outcome of cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, nor surviving a cardiac arrest in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (pump function).
The primary outcome of death or new myocardial infarction through day 7 occurred in 5.5 percent of the patients treated with otamixaban vs. 5.7 percent of the patients treated with UFH plus eptifibatide.
Weinstock and colleagues looked for
a primary outcome of life - threatening arrhythmia, inpatient heart attack, cardiac or respiratory arrest, or death.
Unfortunately, the treatment did not improve the specific memory and thinking tests that were
the primary outcome of the study, nor did it decrease the chances of progressing to full dementia symptoms.
[5]
The primary outcome of the study was safety and tolerability, with immunological response to the vaccine as a secondary outcome.
The primary outcome of the research was the number of intrusive memories in the first week after the trauma.
«Because this was not considered a priori to be
a primary outcome of interest, the mechanisms responsible for this finding were not explored.»
The primary outcome of the HEALTHY study was the combined prevalence of overweight and obese students at the end of the study.
This study evaluated a new set of cardiac patients for
the primary outcome of diabetes, which was not significantly associated with fasting (after multiple - comparisons correction) in the first study (37) and, thus, required additional evaluation as the primary hypothesis test (38).
But the lesson is not
the primary outcome of the process, as it usually is in curriculum development.
Our primary outcome of interest is whether a student received an exclusionary disciplinary consequence — that is, one that removed him or her from the classroom as punishment, including detention, in - school suspension, out - of - school suspension, or expulsion.
Calls for regulation from the conventional financial services industry and within the Bitcoin community have been
a primary outcome of the Mt. Gox debacle.
Significant moderate effect sizes were found for all levels of SSTP for reducing child problems,
the primary outcome of interest.
The conclusion of the equality of effects of psychological therapies, however, showed a trend for a spin, which means that for
the primary outcome of interest the review more often states equality despite inequality of treatment effects (OR = 2.69 (0.86 to 8.41).
In support of these results, multilevel modeling of the outcomes revealed the predicted time × condition interaction for
the primary outcome of clinician - rated PTSD symptom severity (t37.5 = − 3.09; P =.004) and for patient - reported relationship satisfaction (t68.5 = 2.00; P =.049).
So, for example,
the primary outcome of mania was a parent report measure (the Child Mania Rating Scale) that, the investigators claim, is «more comprehensive, nuanced, and contextualised» than clinician - rated measures such as the Young Mania Rating Scale.
The primary outcome of the study will be general psychopathology as measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
As previously reported, the pretreatment to post-treatment effect size on
the primary outcome of health anxiety HAI was d = 1.8 in the ICBT group and d = 1.2 in the IBSM group, indicating that both treatments yielded large improvements in health anxiety.12 Mixed - effects models analysis showed that ICBT led to significantly larger reductions of health anxiety compared with IBSM (F = 3.9; df = 2, 121; p = 0.022; between - group d at post-treatment = 0.3).
The level of child emotional and behavioral problems was
the primary outcome of this study.
Not exact matches
«While we are disappointed CheckMate - 026 did not meet its
primary endpoint in this broad patient population, we remain committed to improving patient
outcomes through our comprehensive development program, including the ongoing Phase III CheckMate - 227 study exploring the potential
of the combination
of Opdivo plus [our other cancer immunotherapy] Yervoy for PD - L1 positive patients, and Opdivo plus Yervoy, or Opdivo plus chemotherapy in PD - L1 negative patients,» he added.
So we know what the
outcome of a successful negotiation would be: Greece would be obliged to run a positive but small «
primary surplus,» that is, an excess
of revenue over spending not including interest.
GFI's innovation department has two
primary areas
of focus — firstly, encouraging scientists and entrepreneurs to join the plant - based and cultured meat industries, and secondly, supporting the ongoing success
of existing companies in the industry.26 They have assembled a list
of potential companies based on what they believe are promising ideas that have not been capitalized on, 27 and they have developed a list
of more than 220 entrepreneurs and scientists, many
of whom take part in monthly video calls led by GFI.28 In the last year, they have had some success in assisting in the founding
of a plant - based meat company in India, Good Dot, and a plant - based fish company in the U.S., SeaCo.29 The companies have both raised millions in venture capital and are making progress towards competition with animal products.30 Although venture capitalist funding is a good indication that the companies themselves will be successful, and while the companies might not exist without GFI, it is unclear what portion
of the responsibility for the companies»
outcomes should be attributed to GFI.
Whitehead's analysis inverts all that, making becoming (and subjectivity as well)
primary, with being derivative as the
outcome of becoming.
But even congregations with no intention
of applying for such funds are affected by the
outcome, since this new way
of framing the issue contributes to a public expectation that social - service delivery is the
primary mission
of churches.
As we know, one
of the
primary positions in discussions
of discrimination today is «disparate
outcomes.»
In their thought
of their tragedy a
primary emphasis on future
outcome and meaning was substituted for the old, exclusive emphasis on past transgression.
Consultation on the 2017 — 18 plan has occurred with South Australian Department
of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (including the South Australian Murray - Darling Basin Natural Resource Management Board), New South Wales Office
of Environment and Heritage, Victorian Environmental Water Holder, Victorian Catchment Management Authorities, New South Wales Department
of Primary Industries - Fisheries, Water New South Wales, the Murray — Darling Basin Authority, the Murray - Darling Wetlands Working Group, Nature Foundation South Australia, Ngarrindjeri Regional Authority, Renmark Irrigation Trust, scientists engaged in monitoring the
outcomes of Commonwealth environmental water use, the Murray - Lower Darling Environmental Water Advisory Group and various community groups and individuals.
Consultation on the 2017 - 18 plan has occurred with New South Wales Office
of Environment and Heritage, Central Tablelands Local Land Services, New South Wales Department
of Primary Industries - Fisheries, New South Wales Department
of Primary Industries - Water, the Murray - Darling Basin Authority, the Lachlan Environmental Water Advisory Group, scientists engaged in monitoring the
outcomes of Commonwealth environmental water use and various community groups and individuals.
Monitoring
of the
outcomes of this watering action was undertaken by the NSW Department
of Primary Industries — Fisheries and WaterNSW (funded by the Commonwealth Environmental Water Office), the NSW Office
of Environment and Heritage, and the Commonwealth Environmental Water Office.
The
primary outcome was the mean healthiness
of all packaged food purchases over the 4 - wk intervention period, which was measured by using the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criterion (NPSC).
Unconscionable conduct (agrees with NFF that they have not provided protection and support reforms «to provide transparency in the supply chain» and recognise that «certain classes
of suppliers... are predisposed to suffering from a special disadvantage...»; misuse
of market power (legal framework must «level the balance
of market power in negotiations...», «ensure transparency in the transmission
of market prices» and «not allow for final market risks to be borne by the
primary producer» and provide «transparency
of contract processes» - specifically, Canegrowers supports effects test and a process giving ACCC greater power to «regulate anti-competitive behaviour and impose penalties», shifting «the decisions framework from the judicial system to a regulatory system» which would make it more accessible to small producers); collective bargaining (notes limits
of Sugar Industry Act (Qld); authorisation and notification approval costly and limited and not a viable alternative - peak bodies should be able to «commence and progress collective bargaining with mills on behalf
of their members» and current threshold too restrictive)» competitive neutrality (mixed
outcomes - perverse
outcomes in the case
of natural monopolies - suggest remove «application
of competitive neutrality provisions to natural monopoly essential services»)
@Zesire, the reason is not far fetched, when you have a coach, who is playing the role
of a club director & contract negotiator instead
of focusing on his
primary assignment & allow others do their job, the
outcome is what is happening now.
The betting line isn't designed to predict the
outcome of a sporting event instead it's
primary function is to force bettors (
of all ability levels) into making decisions before they invest.
... [T] here was a significant excess
of the
primary outcome in births planned at home compared with those planned in obstetric units in the restricted group
of women without complicating conditions at the start
of care in labour.
The Birth Place Research Quality Index (ResQu Index) was designed to provide a reliable instrument to rate the quality
of primary research that examines the impact
of place
of birth to maternal and newborn
outcomes.
Results There were 250
primary outcome events and an overall weighted incidence
of 4.3 per 1000 births (95 % CI 3.3 to 5.5).
Overall, there were no significant differences in the odds
of the
primary outcome for births planned in any
of the non-obstetric unit settings compared with planned births in obstetric units (table 3 ⇑).
For the restricted sample
of women without any complicating conditions at the start
of care in labour, the odds
of a
primary outcome event were higher for births planned at home compared with planned obstetric unit births (adjusted odds ratio 1.59, 95 % confidence interval 1.01 to 2.52) but there was no evidence
of a difference for either freestanding or alongside midwifery units compared with obstetric units.
For multiparous women there was no evidence
of a difference in the
primary outcome by planned place
of birth.
In the subgroup analysis stratified by parity, there was an increased incidence
of the
primary outcome for nulliparous women in the planned home birth group (weighted incidence 9.3 per 1000 births, 95 % confidence interval 6.5 to 13.1) compared with the obstetric unit group (weighted incidence 5.3, 3.9 to 7.3).
«The CDC report and other research shows that babies born to women cared for by Certified Professional Midwives are far less likely to be preterm or low birth weight, two
of the
primary contributing factors not only to infant mortality, but to racial and ethnic disparities in birth
outcomes.»
There was no difference overall between birth settings in the incidence
of the
primary outcome (composite
of perinatal mortality and intrapartum related neonatal morbidities), but there was a significant excess
of the
primary outcome in births planned at home compared with those planned in obstetric units in the restricted group
of women without complicating conditions at the start
of care in labour.
The
primary outcome was a composite
of perinatal mortality and specific neonatal morbidities: stillbirth after the start
of care in labour, early neonatal death, neonatal encephalopathy, meconium aspiration syndrome, brachial plexus injury, fractured humerus, and fractured clavicle.13 This composite measure was designed to capture
outcomes that may be related to the quality
of intrapartum care, including morbidities associated with intrapartum asphyxia and birth trauma.