This has been
the primary purpose of religion, of course - to congregate people for the Greater Good - but God has been, in fact, the divine carrot.
Not exact matches
The HHS mandate allows religious exemption if the organization meets the following criteria: (1) its
primary purpose is to promote religious values; (2) it primarily employs persons
of the same
religion; (3) it primarily serves persons
of the same
religion; and (4) it is a nonprofit organization under specific sections
of the Internal Revenue Code.
While it is true that the
primary purpose of the 1st Amendment is to guarantee freedom
of religion, it does, in some very important ways, provide for freedom
of religion within the Establishment Clause.
While it is true that the
primary purpose of the 1st Amendment is to guarantee freedom
of religion, it does, in some very important ways, provide for freedom from
religion within the Establishment Clause.
By holding that the statute did not have an impermissible
purpose, that its
primary effect was not the advancement
of religion, and that it did not require «excessive entanglement» between church and state, the Court sent a signal to the political branches that more creative uses
of the structures
of civil society (including churches) may now be permissible in the American welfare state.
The principle, in this context, merely constrains government officials not to make decisions with the predominant
purpose or
primary effect
of advancing
religion; in other words, the predominant
purpose and
primary effect must be nonreligious or secular in nature.
It consists
of three prongs: The government's action must have a secular legislative
purpose; The government's action must not have the
primary effect
of either advancing or inhibiting
religion; The government's action must not result in an «excessive government entanglement» with
religion.
Two Illinois courts
of appeals held that Illinois» tax credit for educational expenses is constitutional because it has a clearly secular legislative
purpose of ensuring a well - educated citizenry and relieving public expense, has the
primary effect
of effectuating those
purposes, and involves no more government entanglement with
religion than many other state tax laws.
Likewise, the lower court rejected the ACLU's Blaine Amendment claim, holding that it «was not intended to preclude any expenditure that has an incidental benefit to
religion, where such is made for a
primary secular
purpose,» and that the ESA «was enacted for the valid secular
purpose of providing financial assistance to parents to take advantage
of educational options available to Nevada children.»