It occurs when your body (and especially your brain) uses fat as
its prime source of fuel, rather than glucose.
Not exact matches
As he prodded the
prime minister, Nye, best known as the host
of the 1990s PBS show «Bill Nye the Science Guy,» and more recently for the Netflix series «Bill Nye Saves the World,» cited a study by a group called The Solutions Project that concluded Canada could live entirely without fossil
fuels if it fully embraced renewable energy
sources.
It's not only the Earth's
prime source of light and heat — it also
fuels the greenery that makes breathing possible, keeps time by setting the body's daily rhythms and spits out charged particles that create the beauty
of the aurora borealis.
No matter where in the world fossil
fuels are being used as the
prime source of energy, it is «greatly complicating efforts to curb carbon dioxide emissions.»
Parts
of the Arabian Gulf region —
prime source of the oil that helps
fuel climate change — are most at risk
of becoming uninhabitable for humans unless global warming is tackled.
In one
of geography's ironies, the region most at risk is the Gulf − the
prime source of the crude oil that first began to
fuel the world's accelerating economies in ways that have returned massive quantities
of fossil carbon to the atmosphere and precipitated the threat
of catastrophic climate change.
When an oil production platform caught fire in the Gulf
of Mexico near the Louisiana coast last week, a collective gasp would have been appropriate — from the residents
of coastal Louisiana, who are no strangers to offshore oil rig disasters, from the fossil
fuel industry, which is
priming itself for a golden age under the incoming Trump Administration, and from the American public, whose oil reliance remains unchecked despite increasing awareness
of both the massive downside
of fossil
fuel use and the increasing availability
of clean, renewable energy
sources.
In the process
of putting together evidence to demonstrate that CO2 emissions from fossil
fuels are definitely not the
prime source for observe increase in atmospheric CO2 I came accross a statistic that completely refutes AGW The Kyoto Protocol is not about climate but is strictly a protocol to reduce CO2 emissions for the sole purpose
of slowing down the increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration.
If CO2 emissions from fossil
fuels were the primary driver
of the observed increase in CO2 the drop in CO2 emissions from 31915.9 mt in 2008 to 31338.8 mt in 2009 followed by the rapid increase to 33158.4 mt in 2010 would have influenced this curve in some noticible fashion if your contention about CO2 emissions from fossil
fuels being the
prime source for the observed increase is correct.
As this is clearly not the case with the seasonally adjusted trend showing no change; it is not possible for CO2 emissions fropm fossil
fuels to be the
prime source of the observed increase and therefore your contention that this is the case is simply false!
As he prodded the
prime minister, Nye, best known as the host
of the 1990s PBS show Bill Nye the Science Guy, and more recently for the Netflix series Bill Nye Saves the World, cited a study by a group called The Solutions Project that concluded Canada could live entirely without fossil
fuels if it fully embraced renewable energy
sources.