Other types of
principal effectiveness measures are problematic as well.
Not exact matches
«We are relying more than ever on state exams — to
measure student achievement, to evaluate teacher and
principal effectiveness, and to hold schools and districts accountable for their performance,» Regents Chancellor Merryl H. Tisch said.
Using what the city calls a «new framework for
measuring teacher
effectiveness» instituted in December,
principals approved fewer teachers for tenure this year — 58 percent of 5,209 teachers as opposed to 97 percent of those eligible in 2006 - 7.
On the basis of these survey results, we created three
measures: (1) the
principal's overall assessment of the teacher's
effectiveness, which is a single item from the survey; (2) the teacher's ability to improve student academic performance, which is a simple average of the organization, classroom management, reading achievement, and math achievement survey items; and (3) the teacher's ability to increase student satisfaction, which is a simple average of the role model and student satisfaction survey items.
This is a very large figure, perhaps unbelievably large, implying that a
principal at the 75th percentile of this
effectiveness measure shows average achievement gains of 0.11 standard deviations (relative to the average
principal), while one at the 25th percentile shows average losses of 0.15 standard deviations.
We therefore employ a third approach that gauges the amount of variation in
principal effectiveness directly by
measuring the additional fluctuation in school average achievement gains when a new
principal assumes leadership, as compared to typical fluctuations from year to year.
Our basic value - added model
measures the
effectiveness of a
principal by examining the extent to which math achievement in a school is higher or lower than would be expected based on the characteristics of students in that school, including their achievement in the prior year.
Our first two methods involved estimating
effectiveness measures for individual
principals and then calculating the standard deviation of those
measures.
Another
measure should be a
principal's subjective evaluation of a teacher, which Steele says is a pretty good predictor of a teacher's
effectiveness.
We work with education leaders to
measure the
effectiveness of teachers,
principals, and schools; to examine the equitable distribution of effective teaching; and to understand the factors that help educators have a greater impact on the students they serve.
Mississippi
principals outranked their colleagues in our national and state samples of
principals on almost every attitudinal and behavioral
measure of leadership
effectiveness.
Implement a comprehensive evaluation system for teachers and
principals based on multiple
measures of
effectiveness, including student achievement
We analyzed scores on the inventory descriptively and used them to predict time - use data collected via in - person observations, a survey - based
measure of job stress, and
measures of perceived job
effectiveness obtained from assistant
principals and teachers in the school.
Provide effective support to teachers and
principals in the form of high - quality professional development and
measure the
effectiveness of that professional development
With little known about how to
measure principal effectiveness, a framework to appropriately evaluate
principals is nearly non-existent.
The grading scale
measures a state's record of success, and its reform plans, in four categories: standards and assessments, data systems, teacher and
principal effectiveness, and low - performing schools.
Use student attendance, school safety information, and student growth data as
measures of
effectiveness to reflect
principals» roles as instructional leaders and influencers of school culture.
The framework is designed to help providers
measure the
effectiveness of their
principal preparation programs in an evidence - based and meaningful way.
Artificial inflation is a term I recently coined to represent what is / was happening in Houston, and elsewhere (e.g., Tennessee), when district leaders (e.g., superintendents) mandate or force
principals and other teacher
effectiveness appraisers or evaluators to align their observational ratings of teachers»
effectiveness with teachers» value - added scores, with the latter being (sometimes relentlessly) considered the «objective
measure» around which all other
measures (e.g., subjective observational
measures) should revolve, or align.
Measure results of
principal recruitment, development, and selection efforts by the
effectiveness of the schools lead by their recruits
But for the majority of parents (yes, a majority will look at this data) who believe the overwhelming science that proves VAMs
measure teacher
effectiveness (not completely but better than anything else), we will use this data when we approach the schools /
principals to object to an ineffective teacher.
We propose federal support to help states
measure the
effectiveness of individual teachers — based on their impact on student achievement, subjective evaluations by
principals and peers, and parental evaluations.
VAMs should be used by
principals to
measure school improvement and to determine the
effectiveness of programs and instructional methods.
ASCD invites all educators to make their voices heard in an ongoing discussion of the question, «How do we define and
measure teacher and
principal effectiveness?»
ASCD is holding a public dialogue on how best to define and
measure teacher and
principal effectiveness, and we're inviting you to participate.
All of these elements combine to create meaningful improvement for students and schools, which is the bottom line for judging and
measuring principal effectiveness.
Districts and preparation programs carefully select mentors for new
principals based on mentor quality
measures such as having a history of
effectiveness as a
principal, demonstrating strong communication and listening skills, and matching mentors and
principals based on similar styles of thinking.
Evaluations include multiple
measures of practice and student growth to form a holistic picture of
principal effectiveness; an example
measure could entail the instructional feedback that
principals provide to teachers after classroom observations.
A reliable evaluation system must incorporate other
measures of
effectiveness, like students» feedback about their teachers and classroom observations by highly trained peer evaluators and
principals.
How teacher evaluation methods matter for accountability: A comparative analysis of teacher
effectiveness ratings by
principals and teacher value - added
measures.
The Teacher Evaluation Advisory Committee is charged with developing and recommending to the State Board of Education guidelines and criteria for a multiple -
measures teacher and
principal effectiveness evaluation system, which will be administered annually to all teachers and
principals in the state.
Tennessee's new multiple -
measures teacher and
principal effectiveness evaluation system will enhance our current ability to identify performance levels of educators and be a much more strategic tool for supporting them.
New research attempts to determine the best way to
measure principal effectiveness using students» test scores — and finds that the task is trickier than anticipated.
For programs whose graduates disproportionately fall into the bottom level of the state distribution of teacher or
principal effectiveness as
measured by the teacher /
principal effectiveness evaluation, the SBE may consider this in program renewal decisions.
The study, «
Principal Use of Teacher
Effectiveness Measures for Talent Management Decisions,» was conducted by a team of Vanderbilt University researchers.
Throughout 2010, districts not only will gain access to the tools and training necessary to begin work in this area, but the recently passed legislation, the First to The Top Act, mandates the development and use of an annual multiple -
measure teacher and
principal effectiveness evaluation.
We successfully advocated for four major reforms:
measuring effectiveness through better teacher evaluations, adopting world - class standards for our schools and students, empowering superstar
principals through improved certification paths and ensuring that money follows the child — no matter where they choose to learn.
As part of this drive, the State Board of Education adopted a model framework (Arizona Framework for
Measuring Educator
Effectiveness) for teacher and
principal evaluation that includes quantitative data on student achievement.
In addition, we invite you to participate in the ASCD Forum, an online discussion focused on the question, «How do we define and
measure teacher and
principal effectiveness?»
The Arts are evidenced in annual
principal evaluations (5b) to
measure the existence and
effectiveness of arts programs as a
measure of school success.
Through the multifaceted work, New Leaders recognizes the need for conditions to support effective leadership at scale and advocates for policies and practices related to
principal and teacher
effectiveness, human capital management, standards and assessments, and other
measures.
Principal Burris further notes that Dr. Tisch appears intent on ensuring that the predicted growth of students on standardized tests be the supreme
measure of teacher
effectiveness, suggesting that teachers found ineffective by those
measures be found ineffective overall and removed from the classroom after two such ratings.
Massachusetts aims to strengthen the quality of school leadership across the state by strengthening
principals» skills in three areas: observing classroom practice, analyzing
measures of student learning and teacher
effectiveness, and providing timely and high - impact feedback to their faculty.
However, NAESP can not support the department's recommendation to judge
principal effectiveness «in significant
measure» on student achievement data that relies primarily on standardized test scores.
Sorting out the Signal: Do Multiple
Measures of Teachers»
Effectiveness Provide Consistent Information to Teachers and
Principals?
While researchers have consistently argued that school and
principal accountability systems must adjust for student characteristics and resource allocation levels to accurately assess educator
effectiveness, states continue to rely on systems that
measure student characteristics more than educator
effectiveness.
Special Projects Vocational Empowerment: The Development of a Culturally Competent Peer - Run Photovoice Training Program (2010 — Present) Project Co-Director Development of an Instrument to
Measure Recovery Promoting Competences Among Providers Serving Spanish Speaking Mental Health Consumers (2007 — 2010) Project Director The Development of a Latino Consumer - Provider Training Program (2004 — 2010) Project Director A Study Evaluating the
Effectiveness of a Structured Psycho - Educational Recovery Intervention with English Speaking and Latino Samples (2004 — 2010) Project Coordinator Project A: Building of Capacity of CBOs for Participatory Research & Program Evaluation (Under the Center for Capacity Building on Minorities with Disability Research at the University of Illinois at Chicago (2005 — 2008) Northeast Coordinator Phase II: Community Action Grant for System Change (2002 — 2006)
Principal Investigator Field Initiated Project (NIDRR): Rehabilitation Readiness Tool for Latinos with Psychiatric Disabilities (1999 — 2002) Co-
Principal Investigator Phase I: Community Action Grant for System Change (1998 — 1999) Co-
Principal Investigator Transitional Rehabilitation Services (1996 — 1997) Project Director