A GCSE or A-level lesson introducing Situation Ethics and Joseph Fletcher's core
principle of Agape.
Peirce's argument against determinism in «The Doctrine of Necessity Examined,» published a year earlier than his paper on evolutionary love, clearly lays the basis for the affirmation of radical creativity and the need for
the principle of agape (6.36 - 65).
Not exact matches
A personalistic philosophy
of life does not offer us absolute knowledge;... we discover divine purpose in so far as our human purposes are ruled by the New Testament
principles of logos and
agape - reason and love.
As was pointed out a moment ago, because the
agape in question is a
principle of finite creative agents, the agapastic love
of these agents must be infected by eros.
However, in proposing that
agape is the
principle of creativity, Peirce attempted to show that specific instances
of spontaneity can be the responsibility
of an operative
principle,
agape, which specifically functions creatively.
This discussion began with the observation that Peirce offered an insight into speculation about evolution when he introduced the notion
of agape as an operative
principle.
We said that in
principle the good which
agape seeks must include the good
of the self, for the Kingdom
of God does not exclude any good, even my own.
The foreword
of the present book includes a 1965 letter from Ramsey to Fletcher: «[T] he candid issue between us is whether
agape is expressed in acts only or in rules also, which question is generally begged; or else the structures in which human beings live are attributed to other than uniquely Christian sources
of understanding (natural law, etc.) while Christians go about pretending to live in a world without
principles.
It should be made clear that all students are to be treated with kindness and
agape love, empathy, but the
principles of the Bible are to be adhered to, taught and not deviated from, as Jesus taught we
of Christ are to be in, never
of the world.
He simply carried a Christian understanding
of agape (love or covenant fidelity), relatively detached from its theological context, into medical ethics and then used this love as a
principle by which to evaluate and transform the covenants already present in the world
of medical care.
Also, he sees freedom and equality as perennial
principles of justice that, like
agape in relation to philia and justice, serve as judgment on their approximations (or lack thereof), and call communities to fuller approximations.