He stresses that he firmly believes in
the principle of equal marriage.
Not exact matches
And yet, if same - sex
marriage is to be truly
equal to natural
marriage in the eyes
of society and the law, then all the rights and privileges
of marriage — including those involving the procreation and rearing
of children — must in
principle belong to both kinds
of marriage, irrespective
of the motives impelling a couple toward
marriage or whether, once married, they exercise these rights and privileges.
«The federal Defense
of Marriage Act clearly violates the principle of equal justice under law as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and improperly intrudes on the traditional role of states in defining marriage,» Schneiderman said in a st
Marriage Act clearly violates the
principle of equal justice under law as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and improperly intrudes on the traditional role
of states in defining
marriage,» Schneiderman said in a st
marriage,» Schneiderman said in a statement.
The further possible exception to
equal sharing alluded to in para 86 was «where both parties had worked throughout the
marriage, had pooled some
of the assets built up by their efforts but had chosen to keep other such assets under their separate control, the latter, although unequal in amount, were unilateral assets which might not be subject to the sharing
principle... we would prefer, so far as it is proper for us to do so, to keep the room for application
of the concept closely confined».