Sentences with phrase «principle of equal treatment for»

When funding any school, whether public or private, the government should not surrender the longstanding principle of equal treatment for all regardless of religion.

Not exact matches

This would call into question the effectiveness of the Family Reunification Directive and thwart the specific protection for unaccompanied minor refugees, as well as the principle of equal treatment and legal certainty.

Advised and acted in judicial review challenges for and against government departments raising issues of UK and EC law, including the principle of equal treatment of agricultural businesses

78 However, the absence of such an autonomous and uniform definition under European Union law of the concepts of social security, social assistance and social protection and the reference to national law in Article 11 (1)(d) of Directive 2003/109 concerning those concepts do not mean that the Member States may undermine the effectiveness of Directive 2003/109 when applying the principle of equal treatment provided for in that provision.

He does so by analyzing the principle of equal treatment not only in the context of the Directive, but also in the context of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, the ECHR and the Geneva Convention, and through the examination of these legal instrument concluding that differential treatment according to immigration status is only justifiable if the reason for this differential treatment passes a strict proportionality test.

It is for the employer to prove that there was no breach of the principle of equal treatment.

EU law takes priority over domestic law and it guarantees a directly effective right for all persons to be treated in accordance with the principle of equal treatment in relation to employment and working conditions.

... when they implement the possibility provided for in Article 51 of Directive 2004/18 [whereby the contracting authority may invite economic operators to supplement or clarify the certificates and documents submitted to it], the Member States must ensure that they do not jeopardise the attainment of the objectives pursued by that directive or undermine the effectiveness of its provisions and other relevant provisions and principles of EU law, particularly the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination, transparency and proportionality...

The landmark judgment, P v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2017] UKSC 65, concerns the directly eff ective right of police offi cers under EU law to have the principle of equal treatment in relation to employment and working conditions applied to their circumstances.

The Federal Arbitration Act (the Act) makes arbitration agreements «valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract,» 9 U.S.C. ¶ 2, establishes an equal - treatment principle: A court may invalidate an arbitration agreement based on «generally applicable contract defenses,» but not on legal rules that «apply only to arbitration or that derive their meaning from the fact that an agreement to arbitrate is at issue,» AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 339.

56 In a similar vein, Article 24 (2) of Directive 2004/38 allows a derogation from the principle of equal treatment enjoyed by Union citizens other than workers, self - employed persons, persons who retain such status and members of their families who reside within the territory of the host Member State, by permitting that State not to confer entitlement to social assistance, in particular for the first three months of residence (see Joined Cases C ‑ 22 / 08 and C ‑ 23 / 08 Vatsouras and Koupatantze [2009] ECR I ‑ 4585, paragraphs 34 and 35).

Its conclusions turned on its interpretation of the equal treatment principle in Council Directive 79 / 7 / EEC on equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security, and on the CJEU's seminal judgment in Case C - 423 / 04 Richards v Secretary of State of Work and Pensions.

Today's vote is a major step forward for the American principle of equal treatment under the law,» said PPFA President Cecile Richards.

Finally, respect for human rights obligations, especially the right of indigenous communities «to practice and revitalise their cultural traditions and customs» [74] and to equality before the law, including in the enjoyment of the right to equal treatment before the tribunals and all other organs administering justice [75], calls for the development of principles which address the unique evidentiary issues involved in native title litigation, including the reality of claims based substantially upon orally - transmitted traditions, the lack of written records of indigenous laws and customs, the «unsceptical» receipt of uncorroborated historical evidence incapable of being tested under cross-examination, and the epistemological, ideological and cultural limitations of historical assessments of traditional laws and customs by non-indigenous commentators.