If this budget was unanimously accepted as the guiding
principle of global climate policy and stringent action was taken to limit emissions to 1000 GtCO2, could we be reasonably certain that warming would be limited below 2 °C?
Not exact matches
The plan establishes a set
of six fundamental
principles for the region, which include: transportation and other infrastructure upgrades; new commercial and residential growth; land use and transportation decisions based on
policies like the
Global Warming Solutions Act and the Clean Energy and
Climate Plan; creation and preservation
of workforce housing that matches new job rates; creation and maintenance
of an effective public transit system; and coordinated planning and implementation efforts.
The easiest way to develop a tax narrative is via income tax increases for the very wealthy — you can easily sell this to the 51 %
of voters you need more easily than the technical details about energy security, environmental discourse, science and uncertainty, precautionary
principles,
climate policy stabalisation assessment, green legacies,
global trading schemes, UN COP frameworks ALL
of which have to be defended for the
policy framework to be politically feasible.
5 As long as
global climate policy is supposed to be based on the precautionary
principle, this is the only justifiable course
of action in my opinion.
A strong ethical case can be made that if nations have duties to limit their ghg emissions to their fair share
of safe
global emissions, a conclusion that follows both as a matter
of ethics and justice and several international legal
principles including, among others, the «no harm
principle,» and promises nations made in the 1992 UNFCCC to adopt
policies and measures required to prevent dangerous anthropocentric interference with the
climate system in accordance with equity and common but differentiated responsibilities, nations have a duty to clearly explain how their national ghg emissions reductions commitments arguably satisfy their ethical obligations to limit their ghg emissions to the nation's fair share
of safe
global emissions.
I ran across this
principle at
Climate Scepticism where Paul Matthews posted a summary
of former Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott speech at the
Global Warming
Policy Foundation.