If it can be shown, after all, that the founding
Federalists were opposed to any government that promoted a particular conception of the good life, might we not then say that Laurence Tribe's and Eleanor Smeal's defense of «reproductive freedom» as a constitutional right is consistent with the
principles of Hamilton, Madison, and Jay?
My purpose, therefore, is not to provide a systematic critique of the book, but rather to comment on two of its more interesting aspects, namely: (1) its argument that the
Federalists, in writing the Constitution, were actually defending the
principle of the «neutral» state, and (2) its attempt to apply «neutral state»
principles to the issues of abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia.