Not exact matches
amending the Convention to include the
principles of subsidiarity and the margin
of appreciation; amending the Convention to tighten the admissibility criteria - so that trivial cases can be thrown out and the focus
of the Court can be serious
abuses; reducing the time limit for claims from six months to four improving the selection
process for judges; setting out a roadmap for further reform.
«Nonetheless, the
principle remains the same: it is an
abuse of process to investigate legislators or harass their employers with overbroad subpoenas in order to force a vote, even if it's a vote that we would otherwise support.»
The common law
abuse of process doctrine is designed to protect the fundamental
principles of justice that underlie the community's sense
of fair play and decency.
There is no reason in
principle why a private prosecution should not be considered an
abuse of process if the crime, the subject
of the prosecution, is one that has been encouraged by the private prosecutor or when, in some other way, the private prosecutor has essentially created the same mischief as that about which he or she complains.
Further, it is clear that PHA 1997 proceedings will not be liable to be struck out as an
abuse of process offending the
principle that generally a claimant must present all their case in one go and will be prevented from presenting claims later on that could have been presented in the earlier proceedings (Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100, [1843 - 60] All ER Rep 378).
[79] In response to perceived difficulties in demanding strict adherence to the constituent elements
of res judicata, modern Canadian courts have developed the independent but related concept
of abuse of process as a means
of barring relitigation where permitting it to proceed would offend vital
principles such as judicial economy, consistency, finality
of legal disputes, and, perhaps most importantly, the integrity
of the judicial decision - making
process.
Recognition
of this
principle as fundamental justice does not affect the doctrine
of abuse of process; the two are integrally related.
Recognition
of this
principle as fundamental justice doesn't affect the
abuse of process doctrine; both are integrally related.
/ School restorative conferencing / School restorative conferencing / School setting / Schools / School's contribution / Secure accommodation (1) / Secure accommodation (2) / Self / Self awareness for facilitators / Self in family work / Self - blame / Self - development / Self exposed / Self - expressions / Self formation / Self - injury (1) / Self - injury (2) / Self - injury (3) / Self - mutilation / Self - mutilation: an examination
of a growing phenomenon / Self renewal / Self - supervision (1) / Self - supervision (2) / Selfishness / altruism / Separation and Loss / Separations / Service user involvement / Severe personality disorder / Sex education / Sexual
abuse / Sexual
abuse in an institutional setting / Sexual
abuse recovery work / Shaping modifying environments / Sharing and bearing with a child / Showing that life can be enjoyable / Significant adults / Significant learning / Silence / Silent voices / Single cause / Size
of residential settings / Sleep / Small group living / Small groups / Social brain (The) / Social care in Ireland / Social care — the field / Social change / Social competence (1) / Social competence (2) / Social Competencies: Affect / Social networks in restricted settings / Social Pedagogy / Social policy / Social skills training (1) / Social skills training (2) / Social skills training (3) / Social skills training (4) / Social skills training (5) / Socratic questioning / Solution - focused
principles / Some unanswered questions / Space and place / Space under threat / Spaces / Spatial arrangements / Special considerations in the development
process / Spiritual connection / Spiritual well - being / Spirituality / St. John Bosco / Staff and sexual orientation / Staff induction / Staff integrity / Staff meeting / Staff morale / Staff morale in children's homes / Staff retention / Staff selection / Staff support / Staff training groups in institutions / Staff turnover / Staff values and discipline / Staffing / Statement
of Purpose / Status
of care workers / Stealing / Steering a middle course / Stigma / Story, time, motion, place / Story unfolding / Storybook reading / Street children (1) / Street children (2) / Street children (3) / Street children (4) / Street children (5) / Street children (6) / Street children and self - determination / Street corner / Street kids / Street youth and prostitution / Streetsmart kids / Stress / Stress in child care work / Strengths (1) / Strengths (2) / Strengths (3) / Structure
of activities / Structured storying / Structuring the relationship / Stuck clients / Students / Students, self and practice / Succeeding with at - risk youth / Successful careers / Suicidal behaviour in GLB youth / Suicide (1) / Suicide (2) / Suicide attempts / Suicide risk / Suitability for practice / Supervision (1) / Supervision (2) / Supervision (3) / Supervision (4) / Supervision (5) / Supervision (6) / Supervision (7) / Supervision (8) / Supervision (9) / Supervision and ethics / Supervision and practice / Supervision and teaching / Supervision formats / Supervision: Parallel
process / Supervision wish list / Supervisor insecurity / Support for self - harm / Support for self - harm / Symbolic communication / Symptom tolerance guaranteed / Systemic thinking / Systems (1) / Systems (2) / Systems (3) / Systems and spheres
of influence / Systems thinking / Systems vs developmental views /
Where a claimant sues stating that the issue has been determined in a prior action, the defence may be faced with the
principle that it would be an
abuse of process to permit the matter to be litigated.