Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question
of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an
Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship
of Barack Obama's father at the time
of his birth (irrespective
of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President
of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote
of the College
of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department
of Justice Office
of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution
of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight
of existing legal authority and
prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good
faith that Mr. Obama is not an
Article II «natural born citizen».
I had never heard
of Professor Lewandowsky
prior to July 2012, when I read an
article about the NASA Hoax paper in the Guardian (the paper was sent to Dr Adam Corner) over 1 month
prior to the press release (28th Aug 2012) that drew a lot more attention and I wrote to him in good
faith.