Generally speaking, except for serious crimes which the law punishes with capital punishment, life imprisonment, and imprisonment for more than three years, a defendant can request the prosecutor to initiate a plea bargaining procedure for negotiating the scope of the sentence with
the prior consent of the court.
Not exact matches
Prior to that, he worked as a professor at the University
of Southern California, and a federal
court monitor for the special education
consent decree in the Los Angeles school system.
«All comments received during this period will be considered by the United States Department
of Justice, which remains free to withdraw its
consent to the proposed Final Judgment at any time
prior to the
Court's entry
of judgment.
There appear to be about a dozen wiretapping cases that made it to the
court of appeals in Maryland, and none
of them involve implied
consent (e.g. where it is announced
prior to recording that the call may or will be recorded —
prior is mandatory).
«matrimonial cases were different from ordinary civil cases in that the binding effect
of a settlement embodied in a
consent order stems from the
court's order and not from the
prior agreement
of the parties... in family proceedings there is always a duty
of full and frank disclosure, whereas in civil proceedings this is not universal».
Parenting coordination provides an alternative dispute resolution process whereby an impartial third person called a parenting coordinator assists the parties in developing or implementing their parenting plan by facilitating the resolution
of disputes in high conflict cases, providing education and making recommendations to the parties, and, with the
prior consent of the parties and approval
of the
court, making limited decisions within the scope
of the order
of referral.
Eldercaring Coordination assists the parties in developing or implementing a plan by facilitating the resolution
of disputes in high conflict cases, providing education and making recommendations to the parties, and, with the
prior consent of the parties and approval
of the
court.
Prior to the hearing
of the stay application, the respondents, Lee Carter, Hollis Johnson, Dr. William Shoichet, the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association and Gloria Taylor,
consented to an order staying the declarations
of invalidity and the running
of the suspension
of those declarations as
of August 3, 2012, to the date
of the decision
of the
Court on appeal.
In Davidoff the European
Court of Justice held that relevant and sufficient
consent may be express or, in exceptional circumstances, implied where from the facts and circumstances
prior to, simultaneous with, or subsequent to the goods being placed on the market outside the European Economic Area (EEA), the trade mark owner has unequivocally demonstrated that he has renounced his right to oppose placing the goods on the market in the EEA.
[2]: 11 One insurance textbook states that generally «
courts consider all
prior negotiations or agreements... every contractual term in the policy at the time
of delivery, as well as those written afterward as policy riders and endorsements... with both parties»
consent, are part
of the written policy».
Also, once a divorce complaint has been filed, neither spouse can cancel or modify any insurance policy without
prior consent of the other spouse or
court order.
Revocation
of consent is usually permitted during the time
prior to a
court approving a final adoption decree.
Any health care for the child, whether covered by insurance or not, must be approved in advance, in writing, by both parents or by
prior court order if it would result in an actual out -
of - pocket expense
of over $ 100 to the parent who did not incur or
consent to the expense.
So far from these topics being off - limits, any MHP seeking appointment in a
court case needs to fully inform the parties
prior to their
consent [123],
of information about the following kinds
of potentials for bias and agenda: whether the MHP has been married or divorced, and how many times, and under what kinds
of circumstances, and how the MHP currently feels about those events; whether, if divorced, the MHP went through litigation over custody or property, and such details as whether the MHP had problems paying or receiving child support, as well as the custody arrangements
of the MHP's own children and how these worked out and everyone's feelings about them; the MHP's own personal experience taking care
of and spending time with children, within and without the scope
of «parenting», and with regard to parenting, whether that was parenting as a primary caregiver, married or single parent, with or without household and third party help, or as a working parent or stay - home parent, and for how many children, and for how long, and the outcomes from all
of that; i.e. how much time has this person actually spent caring for children on his or her own, and how well did this person's own family systems function, and is this person in fact an «expert» in creating a functioning family and raising happy, healthy, successful children with good outcomes, nay «best» outcomes, thoroughly well - adjusted and having reached the very pinnacles
of their innate potential.
The
court also ruled that withdrawing membership from the Association could not defeat the Challengers»
prior consent to arbitrate disputes, since they were still members
of the Association at the time the fee dispute arose.