Not exact matches
Scaffolding may include the provision
of advanced organizers such as outlines and rubrics, resources, templates, models and worked examples,
concept maps, prompts to recall
prior knowledge, etc..
Students need to be explicitly taught and given opportunities to practice using executive functions to organize, prioritize, compare, contrast, connect to
prior knowledge, give new examples
of a
concept, participate in open - ended discussions, synthesize new learning into concise summaries, and symbolize new learning into new mental constructs, such as through the arts or writing across the curriculum.
The first part
of the 5E model, Engage, introduces the new science
concept by determining the student's»
prior knowledge while revealing student misconceptions.
It requires an understanding
of the representation
of concepts using technologies; pedagogical techniques that use technologies in constructive ways to teach content;
knowledge of what makes
concepts difficult or easy to learn and how technology can help redress some
of the problems that students face;
knowledge of students»
prior knowledge and theories
of epistemology; and
knowledge of how technologies can be used to build on existing
knowledge and to develop new epistemologies or strengthen old ones.
Teachers»
knowledge about students facilitates the development
of strategies to address students»
prior knowledge of particular science
concepts and misconceptions in science (McCrory, 2008).
His work was based on the theories
of David Ausubel and the importance
of prior knowledge as the key to learning new new
concepts.
The fundamental forms
of science assessment that result in learning addressed by the assessment component include the following student outcomes: (a) identifying, constructing, or distinguishing between
of examples illustrating the presence or absence
of a
concept in everyday scenarios, (b) predicting or describing how to produce a specific outcome in everyday scenarios, based upon
knowledge of concept relationship (s), and (c) explaining plausible reasons for an occurrence based upon
prior knowledge of relevant
concept relationships (i.e., abductive reasoning).
LESSON SUGGESTIONS The following two part lesson can be used as a review to deepen the understanding
of concepts previously taught, as a unit opener and to activate
prior knowledge.
By working through these challenges and applying information based on
prior knowledge, students deepen their understanding
of complicated mathematical
concepts.
The FCA clarified that step 3
of the 4 - step obviousness test that was provided in Plavix 1 requires a comparison between the inventive
concept (or the claim as construed) and the
prior art, not the common general
knowledge, to identify the differences, if any, between the inventive
concept and the
prior art.