I suppose there could be interesting questions if the Twitter user was not in the jurisdiction of the court, depending on (among other things) whether the rules of practice permit service out of the jurisdiction without
prior leave of the court.
First, unless the defendant, anonymous Twitter user, resides in Canada (where there is a bilateral reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments treaty with the UK), the service out of the jurisdiction without
prior leave of the court will require a letter of request / letters rogatory (particularly if he / she resides in the U.S.).
Not exact matches
The state
court's Appellate Division on Nov. 15 denied the UFT's motion for
leave to appeal the
court's
prior ruling on the public release
of Teacher Data Reports.
Prior to arriving in Austria, K's daughter - in - law suffered a brutal and traumatic event which
left her with serious health and psychological problems — the nature
of the event was such that the
Court declined to disclose it for fear
of violent reprisals against her.
Prior efforts gave similar powers to the Attorney General, but
left the selection
of the judge to the Supreme
Court «upon the recommendation
of the Chief Administrative Judge for that judicial circuit.»
The
Court has
left open the possibility
of prior disciplinary problems
of consortium members, and arrangements within a consortium, constituting valid issues to be addressed on a carriage motion.
In particular, with regard to Article 15 on the detention
of irregular migrants
prior to their removal the
Court has so far explained how the period
of detention should be calculated and when there is a «reasonable prospect
of removal» (Kadzoev); it has precluded the incarceration
of irregular migrants during the return process on the sole ground that they remain on the territory
of a Member State even though an order to
leave exists (El Dridi), and it has attempted to strike a balance between the right to be heard and the efficiency
of the administrative procedure to extend the period
of detention (G & R).
During the case the
Court heard how Heather Butler's child Sebastian was
left with disabilities and profound damage to his brain after his umbilical cord was compressed, starving him
of oxygen in the days
prior to his delivery.
withdraw a charge at any time
prior to plea by the defendant, or with
leave of the
court, after a plea has been entered;
He then failed to attend multiple
court proceedings, the status review application was dismissed, and the
court order required the father to obtain
leave of the
court prior to bringing any future status review applications.
The
court challenge was launched on behalf
of workers with claims
prior to 2018, who were
left under the old unlawful legislation.
Courts have the inherent jurisdiction to issue orders nunc pro tunc for
leave to proceed with an action where
leave is sought
prior to the expiry
of the limitation period.
Unless you are in immediate danger, speaking with an attorney first can be a wise decision because
leaving the marital home
prior to the issuance
of a
court order could affect issues
of spousal support, division
of property and child custody.
«The duty to protect and enforce informer privilege rests on the police, the Crown, and the
courts, but we have been referred to no
prior case where the duty has been extended to the accused and his or her representatives such as Mr. Barros [a private investigator] apart from the exceptional case
of inadvertent disclosure to defence counsel: see R. v. Hirschboltz, 2004 SKQB 17, [2006] 1 W.W.R. 174, and R.W. Hubbbard, S. Magotiaux and S.M. Duncan, The Law
of Privilege in Canada (loose -
leaf), at pp. 2 - 43 and 2 - 44.