Not exact matches
Given the court's conclusion that Patrick lacked a reasonable
privacy interest
in the contents of the
garbage bags, there was no violation of Section 8 and the evidence was deemed to be admissible.
«Objectively speaking, P abandoned his
privacy interest
in the information when he placed the
garbage bags for collection at the back of his property adjacent to the lot line.
On final appeal, the Supreme Court of Canada concluded that the passenger did not have a reasonable expectation of
privacy in the contents of the
garbage bags found
in the vehicle.
For example,
in R v Patrick, Binnie J listed factors similar to those
in Edwards but geared toward addressing situations where territorial and information
privacy overlap.5 Patrick dealt with
garbage bags put out for collection and retrieved by police.