The ASD superintendent would be able to fire all teachers and staff and enter into five year contracts with
private charter school management companies to handle the schools» operations, all in a bid to catapult low performing schools from the bottom five percent up into the top echelon of the state's high performing schools.
Meanwhile, Perry has spent the last few years trying to persuade Hartford officials to hand over existing public schools to
a private charter school management company that Perry set up while serving as a public school principal.
Perry has also set up his own
private charter school management company and with eight of his fellow Capital Prep administrators and teachers Perry has submitted a proposal to open a charter school in Bridgeport, Connecticut.
But now we are told, by right wing conservatives who despise social democracy, that public education is an evil and that the best thing for the poor is to get their children into a charter school, nominally public, but typically managed by
a private charter school management company (backed by Wall St money).
«CPS [Capital Preparatory Schools Inc. which is Perry's
private charter school management company] is designed to be a fiscally fit «boutique» charter management organization («CMO»)....
In addition to his lucrative public - speaking business and
his private charter school management company, the Hartford Board of Education employee — who misses more than 25 % of Hartford school days — has joined television Bishop T.D. Jakes in creating a new «Continuing Education Program.»
Not exact matches
WHEREAS Wall Street financier and
private equity fund manager Steven Klinsky is the founder of Victory Education Partners, Inc., a privately held, for - profit educational
management company that manages
charter schools in New York, Pennsylvania and Illinois; and
In spring 2006, Maryland state superintendent of public instruction Nancy Grasmick sought to take over 11 chronically low - performing Baltimore
schools that were subject to restructuring and convert them to
charters or contract their
management with
private companies.
The roadblocks are especially severe when virtual
schools also tie in with other controversial reforms, such as
charter schools, contracting out to
private management companies, and the interdistrict competition for students generated by open enrollment.
The paper reported that «
charter schools have become a parallel
school system unto themselves, a system controlled largely by for - profit
management companies and
private landlords — one and the same, in many cases — and rife with insider deals and potential conflicts of interest.»
After their first Tucson
charter school was ranked the nation's sixth - best high
school by Newsweek, the Blocks went on to found BASIS.ed, a
management company that operates 12 BASIS
Schools around the country, with two additional BASIS Independent (private) schools to be opened in Brooklyn, New York and San Jose, Cali
Schools around the country, with two additional BASIS Independent (
private)
schools to be opened in Brooklyn, New York and San Jose, Cali
schools to be opened in Brooklyn, New York and San Jose, California.
Charter Schools USA, a Florida - based
private school management company, will run the
school next year — and the Indiana Board of Education grappled with how to fund it at its Wednesday meeting.
Last week, the General Assembly approved legislation that allows
private, for - profit
charter school management companies to keep their employees» salaries secret, even though they are paid with public funds.
Public education in Philadelphia is a mixture of district - run
schools,
schools operated by
private management companies and
charter schools, which are public but operate independently from the district.
«Perry's group» being a
private company that Steve Perry formed out of his home in 2012 and then moved its address to Capital Prep, a public
school building while he submitted the paperwork to become a «non-profit»
charter school management company under the federal IRS code.
The previous Differentiated Accountability (DA) statute called for four Intervene turnaround models for the lowest performing
schools: district managed turnaround, closure, operation through a
private management company, or conversion to a
charter school.
Local
school boards, superintendents, and especially communities were not interested in closing
schools, and
private management companies and
charter schools were also not interested in the turnaround work in Florida.
After prominent failures in Hartford, Conn., and Baltimore,
private management companies have begun to focus more on
charter schools, which usually are freed from many of the regulatory restraints that most public
schools have to follow.
But the damage might be irreparable: thousands of closed
schools, worse conditions in those left open, an extreme degree of «teaching to the test,» demoralized teachers, rampant corruption by
private management companies, thousands of failed
charter schools, and more low - income kids without a good education.
At the
school level, stories of
charters founded by groups of teachers and parents recall the early days of the movement, but increasingly,
private companies and
management entities are taking responsibility for opening and running
charter schools.
The book also pays special attention to the role of
private management companies, which operate nearly three - fourths of the state's
charter schools.
A few years ago, I wrote in ctnewsjunkie.com about
charter management fees charged by
private companies that manage
charter schools in Connecticut.
Further, the NOLA system means that if you don't like your child's
school you're less likely to have a way to do something about it, because the
charters are often run by
private boards and
management companies, many of which aren't based in New Orleans or even based in Louisiana.
Cunningham said Athlos» lease arrangement is one example of the loopholes used by
charter management companies, allowing
private interests to operate public
schools outside the intentions of state law.
In 2012, Milner
school was selected by the Commissioner of Education for a second «turnaround» under the
management of a
private charter company, Jumoke / FUSE, which would be paid a
management fee of around $ 350,000 a year.
Betsy DeVos has one mission at the Department of Education: to expand
charter schools and lead the establishment of a federal voucher program — a program that would siphon public dollars meant for our public
schools, and allow it to pad the pockets and budgets of
private schools and
private management companies.
Flush with public funds, this
private non-profit corporation has even started a new
charter school management company called FUSE, Inc..
And thanks to Presidents George W. Bush and Barak Obama, federal law provides that failing
schools can be handed over to
charter school management companies... and with it hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer funds going to
private charter school corporations to run public
schools.
For a number of
charter schools, roughly 10 percent of all of public dollars meant for educating children in these
schools go to pay fees for
private companies called «
charter management organizations.»
Charter schools have become a parallel
school system unto themselves, a system controlled largely by for - profit
management companies and
private landlords — one and the same, in many cases — and rife with insider deals and potential conflicts of interest.
His proposal would allow the state to take over consistently failing
schools and enable
private management companies to open
charter schools in failing neighborhoods.
FUSE was created in 2012 as a
management company that used public and
private money to take over failing, inner - city public
schools and operate them as public
charter schools.
The
charter management company can just «convert» to a
private school, avoid all accountability and start taking voucher cash from the state.
This is a radical repurposing of a public goal to meet the needs of
private corporations, and is echoed in the mission and «vision» statements of the leading
charter school management companies:
But with the «green light» from Governor Malloy's administration and the New York Board of Regents, the two new
charter schools will mean that Perry and his
private company will be collecting approximately $ 25 million in
management fees over the next five years.
According to the
charter school proposals Perry and his operation submitted in Connecticut and New York, he and eight of his senior administrators and teachers have been working for the past two years to turn Perry's
private company into a
charter school management chain.