Not exact matches
The perennial question of how some people practice law while they
make laws arises anew as U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's high - octane criminal
complaint against Silver alleging «millions of dollars in bribes and kickbacks masked as legitimate income earned as a
private lawyer.»
In addition, we reported the total number of
complaints made against each servicer for federal student loans,
private student loans, and both combined.
Another interesting statistic that we found is that, despite
private student loans
making up only around 10 % of the total student loan market, 42 % of all
complaints against servicers were
made regarding
private student loans.
The following table shows the
complaints made against each servicer regarding all types of student loans - both federal and
private.
Featured below is a table that displays the three most common
complaints made against MOHELA and how many of those
complaints are related to either federal or
private student loans.
The following table indicates the three most common
complaints made against Granite State and how many of those
complaints are related to either federal or
private student loans.
In the table below you will find the three most common
complaints made against OSLA Servicing and how many of those
complaints are related to either federal or
private student loans.
The table below features the five most common
complaints made against student loan servicers for
private student loans only and how many times each
complaint has been filed in 2017.
The following table displays the three most common
complaints made against Nelnet and how many of those
complaints are related to either federal or
private student loans.
The table below highlights the three most common
complaints made against Great Lakes and how many of those
complaints are related to either federal or
private student loans.
Below you will find the three most common
complaints made against Navient and how many of those
complaints are related to either federal or
private student loans.
Patients are understood to have taken advice about
making medical negligence claims
against an NHS hospital, after minor operations by a
private provider prompted
complaints.
That decision required the panel to
make findings of fact (whether there would be procedural prejudice, for example) findings of law (such as whether responsibility for delay before the establishment of the current or most recent regulatory regime should be attributed to the Commissioner) and the exercise of a discretion (weighing in the balance the public interest in addressing the
complaints on their merits
against the public and
private interest in fair adjudication).