That's when groups backing
private gun ownership, including the National Rifle Association, leaned on Congress to limit such research.
- is virulently against
private gun ownership - is a HUGE supporter of quotas and racial set asides (yet decries racism)- is pro DC voting rights / statehood - is very much pro-choice - is against the death penalty - favors raising taxes (and letting Bush's expire), not cutting spending - favors a nationalized health care plan
When my convention starts, if people I don't agree with are organized and motivated, many state delegations could be packed with people who want to alter so «ONLY Corporations And Fetuses are People,» «
Private gun ownership of any type of Firearm is an Inalienable Right» and «Citizens must Show a Positive Net Worth of at least 500,000 US Dollars in order to be allowed to vote.»
Not exact matches
Within a year - and - a-half of the killings,
private ownership of hand
guns was completely banned in mainland Britain.
But what questions have been researched by
private institutions like the Harvard Injury Control Research Center show a clear connection between
gun ownership,
gun availability, homicides, and violent death.
Around when Australia adopted its
gun regulations, Parliament passed legislation banning
private ownership of handguns in Britain and banned semiautomatic and pump - action firearms throughout the UK.
His conclusions didn't fit the anti-gun narrative that
guns are used in crimes far more than in self - defense and therefore
private ownership must be abolished.
It's absurd that the issue of
gun ownership has become this «
private, personal» matter that no one can touch.
They included leftist politicos I knew to be opportunistic liars in other contexts — particularly
gun ownership — along with movie stars and other brain - dead celebrities that flock to any cause that attacks
private industrial capitalism and individual liberty.