Posted on October 18, 2016 · A bipartisan group of state representatives hammered
private school choice proponents at a heated legislative hearing on Monday, signaling an enduring uphill battle in the Texas House for proposals that would use taxpayer dollars to help parents send their kids to private or parochial schools, or educate them at home.
In «The Chartered Course: Can
Private School Choice Proponents Learn from the Charter School Sector?»
Not exact matches
The prediction comes from both
proponents and opponents of the tuition - voucher measure, which, by providing parents with $ 900 for each student enrolled in a
private or out - of - district public
school, would be the most extensive
choice program yet adopted by any state.
Finally, I have a recommendation for
proponents of
school choice: Educate policymakers, the media, and the general public on the longstanding regulatory relationship between state governments and
private schools.
In response,
choice proponents cite evidence that
private school students are more civically engaged than their public
school peers.
Its summary, written by Chester Finn and Amber Winkler, tells us that «many
proponents of
private school choice... take [this] for granted,» citing two examples — one of them being the Cato Institute, whose Center for Educational Freedom I direct.
To voucher
proponents, that student performance at
private schools is ultimately on par with that at public
schools shows vouchers are working as intended, giving families an equal but different
choice.
Many
proponents of
private school choice — both the voucher and tax credit scholarship versions — take for granted that
schools won't participate (or shouldn't participate) if government asks too much of them, regulates their practices, requires them to reveal closely held information and — above all — demands that they be publicly accountable for student achievement.
«
Choice proponents contend that using public funds to subsidize
private school tuition will improve achievement among low - income and special needs students, however the research has shown no conclusive evidence that this is the result,» continued Gentzel.
Proponents of the program say the voucher program is a way to give students better
choices when it comes to their education; critics say it siphons badly needed funds away from public education and funnels them into unaccountable, religious
private schools that are not obligated to hold themselves to high quality teaching standards.
Ball points to out - of - state
school choice proponent Public School Options as an instigator in a campaign to advocate the state's controversial online charter school, operated by private for - profit company K12 Inc., that's been «troubled by high dropout rates and flagging academic numbers in its first two years of operation.&
school choice proponent Public
School Options as an instigator in a campaign to advocate the state's controversial online charter school, operated by private for - profit company K12 Inc., that's been «troubled by high dropout rates and flagging academic numbers in its first two years of operation.&
School Options as an instigator in a campaign to advocate the state's controversial online charter
school, operated by private for - profit company K12 Inc., that's been «troubled by high dropout rates and flagging academic numbers in its first two years of operation.&
school, operated by
private for - profit company K12 Inc., that's been «troubled by high dropout rates and flagging academic numbers in its first two years of operation.»
While the changes could rope more siblings into the voucher program,
school choice proponents have told StateImpact many of the state's
private schools are already nearing capacity — and unless the state increases the amount of a scholarship, it's not likely more
private schools will open to accept them.
But
proponents of
school choice say the new limits — $ 4,700 this year and $ 4,800 next year for students in grades K - 8 — are still too low to pay tuition at many
private schools.
School choice proponents may have had their biggest success in Indiana, where Republican Governor Mitch Daniels signed legislation that removes the charter cap, allows all universities to be charter authorizers, and creates a voucher program that enables about half the state's students to attend public or
private schools.
In Ohio, the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a conservative think tank and
proponent of
school choice, released a study of that state's program which found: «Students who use vouchers to attend
private schools have fared worse academically compared to their closely matched peers attending public
schools.»