Not exact matches
Three former Labour MPs and a
peer seeking to avoid facing a criminal trial
over their expenses claims will have their parliamentary
privilege defence tested by the high court today.
This approach
privileges family background
over any indicators of school resources or
peer group relationships, as it implicitly attributes all shared variation to those variables included in the first step of the stepwise modeling.
It is fundamental to that decision that it was not the judge who
peered uninvited behind the veil normally drawn
over without prejudice offers exchanged at mediations, but both parties who invited him there by specifically waiving any
privilege.