It further found that viewing such content is not
privileged by the exception of Article 5 (1) for temporary reproduction of the same directive, thereby rendering the provision as well as the streaming of unlawful content illegal, and thus increasing the circle of persons who can be held liable.
Where there is a joint retainer, communications to the lawyer
by either party can not be
privileged from the other joint party, but all communications are
privileged as between the lawyer and the clients and can not be disclosed outside the retainer (subject to
exceptions).