Sentences with phrase «pro-legalisation open society»

They will likely see the Harvard / MIT study data as confirming that belief — not to mention the fact that the study was financed by the Open Society Foundations.

Our responsibility, as technologists and as members of an open society is to make sure that the positives adequately outweigh the negatives.

«Open society will always have its enemies,» Soros said, «and each generation has to reaffirm its commitment to open society for it to survive.»

Free speech and the ability to tolerate offence are the hallmarks of a free and open society.

A free & open internet is critical to innovation, an open society, & widespread access to economic empowerment.

If protests continue, tourism dollars are likely to drop severely and put even more pressure on the government to accommodate those who are calling for a more open society.

Billionaire investor George Soros has transferred «the bulk of his wealth» to the Open Society Foundations, the nonprofit organization said.

George Soros has transferred the bulk of his wealth to his Open Society Foundations.

As Soros revealed, he choose to study under Popper after his book The Open Society and Its Enemies made a deep impression.

A representative from Open Society did not respond to a request for comment from Fortune.

Open Society tweeted the Journal «s original story.

Created by Soros in 1979, Open Society is a grant - making foundation with branches and partners around the world and focuses on supporting democracies and combating issues of injustice and discrimination, among other causes.

A June 2010 conference sponsored by the Open Society Institute, a foundation founded by liberal investor George Soros, focused mainly on human rights law.

Put another way, in an open society where long - term corporate performance is built on trust among its various constituencies, it is difficult to defend hiding such direct corporate action (or forcing stakeholders to piece information together from myriad reports), even though a comprehensive report may cause stakeholder or media scrutiny and criticism.

America's open society drives an entrepreneurial culture of risk taking, is accepting of failure, leading to creativity and innovation.

But I think it is wonderful that the Internet allows open discussion where many doubters to express their views here as we become a more open society.

In an «open society» the option is there for exploration.

The dynamics of a free and open society, in which the individual has full range for creative capacities, have shown their superiority over tyranny built upon a 19th - century ideology.

Globalization offers the opportunity for the rise of a new kind of human society, an open society on a global scale.

I cherish instead the notion that if we could understand not only the sociology and psychology of religion but also the religion of religion; if we could get at the roots of conviction in the lives of profound believers in the open society; if we could combine civility with devotion — if we could do these things, religious forces might retrieve some initiative and offer examples for coexistence in the world of the nations and the military powers.

For Solidarnosc showed in the most unlikely circumstances the power of freedom in the lives of men driven by their faith and its vision (per John Paul II) of a free and open society.

What «the homeless, tempest - tost» were supposed to find once they arrived on these shores was an «open society,» with «equality of opportunity.»

An open society, on the other hand, is organized on the basis of functional pluralism, in which every person is classified in many different ways, each for a particular purpose, and in which no single general rank order is recognized.

The democracy of worth makes for an open society.

Human society almost everywhere is undergoing the transition from being a predominantly closed society to a more open society (as discussed in Chapter 8).

A free an open society is one in which the freedom to purse any inquiry regardless of where it may lead is valued.

Sir Karl's The Open Society and Its Enemies has become by...

They also embody increasingly the insights of the secular disciplines and reflect the author's increasing enthusiasm for the virtues of an open society which allows freedom to all religious traditions, and also the freedom to analyze and criticize all these traditions through the disciplines of an empirical and historical culture.92

Watkins contrasts the dogmatism in Kuhn's «closed societies» with the continuous criticism in Popper's «open societies» and concludes:

This concentration upon a select group must not be misunderstood, as if he had given up the idea of the new Israel as an open society, and now restricted its membership to a holy remnant.

It's a shame that they are always using our open society ways to bring their «closed» way of thinking to our shores.

It was characteristic of an America that was a remarkably open society and that in the last century became a rising power.

An open society must inject hope anew into every generation, no matter how hopeless the environment has been in the past.

The open society also has some inherent difficulties.

Thus globalization and the advent of the open society, while bringing great benefit to the individual, can have serious consequences for human society.

In the open society, where external authority is greatly reduced, much more responsibility rests with each individual to promote the welfare of the society.

The open society permits and fosters the growth of individualism; people enjoy greater personal freedom and, by the same token, more responsibility.

Only an open society is healthy — dynamic, not static.

Globalization has also meant that we are moving from what may be called the closed society — that is, one surrounded by a clear boundary — to the open society.

The open society has been emerging in the modern world along with the globalization.

Two possible kinds of social harmony — a closed society and an open society.

Many of our current social problems arise from the fact that, as our culture shifts from the closed to the open society, people often struggle with their new social responsibilities.

And this is occurring on a grand scale, as a large number of former closed societies find themselves part of one vast, complex and (as yet) embryonic open society.

Whereas membership of a closed society helped to provide personal identity («I'm a Scotsman», for example, or «I'm a Presbyterian»), individuals in the open society are both freer and have more responsibility to establish their own identity.

Bergson's tensions also underlie an opposition between life and matter, creative and conservative impulses, and an open society and a closed society For Peirce the first is mind, which is lively, and matter, which is sheer (although evolutionary) regularity, and is called «effete mind.»

The very nature of an open society (country) creates the risk that attacks will occur.

How open is Hedges» «open society» if it excludes evangelicals, Muslims, Orthodox Jews, and faithful Catholics from political debate?

Some nations were better poised than others to take advantage of innovation — England in particular, because it had a relatively open society with more scope for entrepreneurship; strong institutions of political liberty; a commitment to the scientific method exemplified by Newton; lots of seaports and colonies; a relative isolation that reduced the risk of invasion; and lots and lots of coal.

Bergson, for instance, in his excellent discussion of The Two Sources of Morality and Religion notes that defensive religion is connected with closed societies, such as nations, but in relating the religion of aspiration to the open society of mankind as a whole he does not apparently note sufficiently that mankind as a whole is also finite.

And how can open societies themselves be saved from giving a posthumous victory to such relativists as Hitler and Mussolini, who began by stating that nothing in politics is right or wrong, that only power matters?