Not exact matches
«the long fat tail that is characteristic
of all recent
estimates of climate sensitivity simply disappears, with an upper 95 %
probability limit... easily shown to lie close to 4 °C, and certainly well below 6 °C.»
A number
of subsequent publications qualitatively describe parameter values that allow models to reproduce features
of observed changes, but without directly
estimating a
climate sensitivity probability density function (PDF).
Their Summary for Policymakers includes an expanded range
of climate sensitivity estimates, compared to the IPCC's 2007 assessment,
of 1.5 ° -4.5 °C with a likelihood defined as 66 - 100 %
probability.
The analysts choose three values
of climate sensitivity (CS) that correspond to the 5th percentile (CS = 2.0 °C), median (CS = 2.5 °C), and 95th percentile (CS = 4.5 °C)
of the
probability density function that were jointly
estimated with the ocean heat uptake rate.
The
probability distributions give a most likely
estimate of 3 °C
of warming for a doubling
of CO2, and all pragmatic scientists tend to work on the basis that the
climate sensitivity is not drastically more than that.
The study
estimated with 68 percent
probability that the equivalent equilibrium
climate sensitivity is between 2.2 and 4.8 °C for a doubling
of CO2, generally consistent with IPCC
estimates, and inconsistent with the lower
estimates preferred by GWPF.
Using available
climate sensitivity uncertainty
estimates (pdfs by Murphy et al., Gregory et al., Forest et al., Wigley & Raper, Knutti et al., etc...), the
probability of overshooting 2 °C global mean temperature rise above pre-industrial levels for a stabilization at 550ppm CO2eq are between 70 % -99 %.