I can only offer what has come to seem to me the most
probable way of understanding it.
Not exact matches
I
understand why this story would open the eyes
of people as a
probable way the world could end from the facts this guy has shown, but it has plot holes.
Those who hear the proclamation may have full confidence in the God
of which it speaks: If... how much more must... Luke, concerned with the ongoing life
of the Church and experience
of the Christian «
way»,
understands the reference to be to confidence in prayer; but it seems more
probable that the original reference was to the totality
of the proclamation as it challenged the hearer.
By the
way, low clouds in darkness increase surface temperature, sort
of like the inverse property
of commonly
understood Cosmic ray effect, not causing a cooling because there are more CR's, but rather a warming, which only low clouds in total darkness can do, so the
probable CR temperature signal gets cancelled from one latitude dark vs bright region to the next.
The notion that CO2 is such a driver
of climate that the projected growth in ambient levels carries the threat
of probable catastrophe is so feeble, so lacking in observational and, indeed, theoretical support that we need other
ways to
understand the motivations
of those who campaign so intemperately against this vital chemical.