Not exact matches
He supports that, but thinks the US and global politics will
probably make that impossible - but that a worse deal than that would still be important, though it involves more mitigation of some
catastrophic effects than a sufficient deal.
Adequate diversification — however you define it — is
probably the most reliable way for an investor to protect himself from the
catastrophic effects that disruption can have on a single company / stock.
After a couple of years of intense volunteer study, we see that there
probably are some CO2
effects, way overstated by the IPCC, but nothing
catastrophic that we need to panic about.
Since the proportions in Australia deeply concerned about the possibly
catastrophic effects of anthropogenic global warming (however much warming there actually is) are
probably about the same as in the USA, how is it that President Trump can ignore something in his country that no one in ours seems to be able to do?