Sentences with phrase «probably meant his comment»

Though the person who sent it probably meant his comment as a... Average Age Arguments Against Online Dating Luke Mogford takes an unflinchingly honest look at his experiences with online dating.

Though the person who sent it probably meant his comment as a... Average Age For Dating Sites If you

Not exact matches

bob — I realized that was what you probably meant after I re-read your comment.

In the end, however, he's probably no worse than this reporter from the Atlanta paper, for whom «unavailable for comment» seems to mean «not sitting next to me while I was writing the story.»

If it means anything (and probably won't to anyone) after reading all the comments I dreamed Shiva was in a big muddy river with no skin on his body and the snake around his neck split into two heads and one bit me... and then I woke up sick.»

After I wrote my comment I thought, wow, I probably should have clarified that by softening it in warm water I meant submerging the jar in warm water, not adding water to the butter!

u are completly right Bob, in that we are way behind.i mean even look at the likes of Everton.and yes like others in the comments i think players like Lemar,Mahrez,Carvalho,Martins - if all are signed - and Sanchez left intact, can make the change.but Wenger and Kroenke, being Wenger and Kroenke, that is very unlikely to happen, and we will be left behind, as always, and probably an even more disastrous season awaits us

He probably did not mean to, but Alexis himself has significantly strengthened our position in that respect with his comments to the Chilean press on the possible transfer that were reported by the Evening Standard.

Arsene has picked up a three game touchline ban for his comments to Mike Dean in the dressing room and he probably said some things he didn't mean in terms of the guy being a cheat, but he's absolutely bang on the nose when he speaks of just how poor they all are now.

However, the point I and PB were making (to be fair PB probably explained it a lot clearer than I did) was that it is highly unlikely that those circumstances will come about meaning that this story that has appeared in the press is as close to a non-story as you can get but it seems to have got plenty of the natives on here overly excited, hence my straw - clutching comment.

Without your support and nice comments I would still be super shy, hiding my smile under lots of hair, covering most of my face — Those of you following for a long time probably know what I mean.

Asked for comment, Honda said ACC is an open - road technology, meaning definitely not for city driving and probably not for suburban driving: «With regard to the Adaptive Cruise Control, we present it as a driver aid, with the driver always required to be engaged and having ultimate control of the car.

Nawotka correctly positions Krüger's comments where they need to be: here in mid-digital-disruption, we probably don't agree and may not even know what «publisher» means, as crazy as that would sound to somebody on the street.

That means that everyone who is an eligible publisher now probably had to recertify in 2007 (my «probably» indicates that I don't have direct evidence, and this is conjecture) and so any worries about people becoming eligible and just staying on the list without comment or question are probably fruitless.

Ubisoft has declined to comment on these developments, which probably means that it's legitimate.

If you're mean to me this week in the comments I will likely cry (which will probably happen anyway this afternoon if England get beat by Slovenia), so let's just all bask in the glow of the global harmony the World Cup has brought and only trade compliments this week.

He, being a painter, probably made this sensible comment in reference to my use of materials, but to me it meant much more.

Regarding Najam's comment about the location (and he probably meant size as well) of housing being more important than the technologies, hold on a minute.

(In anticipation of the obligatory «Jim Karlock probably means well» comment: well, maybe he has good intentions, but that doesn't mean much when he's mindlessly parroting memes.)

I thought it was more like blog posts that provided alternative viewpoints to peer reviewed articles... Clearly comments to posts will have much more variability wrt thoughtful reasoning compared to the posts themselves, so why you would descend to the lowest level as an example of what she probably means by extended peer review is... er, well as someone I know likes to say....

My comment will probably get lost in the mass... But I wrote a feature article for the journal Nature Climate Change explaining what the RCPs and the earlier IPCC scenarios are, and are not, meant to accomplish.

`... over the 100 years since 1870 the successive five year values of average temperatures in England have been highly significantly correlated with the best estimates of the averages for the whole Northern Hemisphere and for the whole earth» (In this last comment he is no doubt referring to his work at CRU where global surface records back to 1860 or so were eventually gathered) he continued; «they probably mean that over the last three centuries the CET temperatures provide a reasonable indication of the tendency of the global climatic regime.»

I still don't know what you meant or what relevance you thought it had to my original passing comment that our food fights probably scare away the very people we might want to engage with.

By the way, I know this is kinda crazy but my bday is the end of February — I know I've probably mentioned this before in a comment here, but I truly feel like I'm meant to be following your journey.

Your comment about white walls as a backdrop for bolder colors is particularly significant fo me as the previous owners of my new «old» house repainted everything except the bedrooms / baths in a custom color that was probably meant to be a beige but in most light looks to me like a very soft golden yellow with even a hint of peach (not ugly, but only the barest hint of beige in the shadows — can't imagine why or how they chose it).