Sentences with phrase «probably more pay»

I think that all moms deserve equal respect and probably more pay.

Not exact matches

«The researchers think pre-questions probably have this benefit because they act as an «orienting device», directing viewers to look out for specific information, and perhaps also because they reduce viewers» complacency and overconfidence in their knowledge, thus motivating them to pay more attention,» reports the British Psychological Society Research Digest's write - up of the findings.

While Williams» base compensation is $ 2.1 million, it's safe to say he's probably getting paid much more, USA Today notes.

And you're probably paying more for it than you should.

And you probably would have enjoyed the tacos and meatballs even more knowing that the $ 50 you paid for them would be going to help people whose dinner that night might have only been a hot dog — if they were lucky enough to have dinner at all.

The kicker in my situation, and probably for many people, is that I'm actually paying more for music now than I ever did.

828 Motion Sleepwear is sold for $ 49 to $ 69, which is probably more than what you're paying for your regular pajamas, but it's not an unusual price point compared to other athletics - inspired sleepwear out there.

«That's probably what's more reasonable to ask a big company to do, is just to fix every job to a tier and then pay out based on what those tiers are.»

What's more, the ESOP probably has to borrow money to buy your shares, and it will be relying on profits to pay off the loan.

Of course, if you're buying New York City real estate, you're probably going to end up paying more than you would for a corner store in my home state of Missouri.

Even though your friend almost certainly has a smaller audience, you know her to be authoritative and knowledgeable on that subject, and thus more likely to trust her opinion vs. someone probably being paid millions to endorse the product - of - the - week.

«If you are just buying income and not paying attention to the valuations, you are probably taking on more risk than you bargained for,» says Brad Kinkelaar, head of the dividend team at Pimco.

iMessage is probably the most fun of the encrypted apps, too, since it supports third - party apps, the ability to pay people with Apple Pay Cash, Animoji and mopay people with Apple Pay Cash, Animoji and moPay Cash, Animoji and more.

I'm probably taking on more risk than you did, but I've got some savings and can probably pick up enough consulting work to pay the bills even if I don't find the right full - time job right away.

But then you'll probably have to pay more taxes.

«Outside of Facebook, there is probably no company paying more attention» than Google, said Jason Kint, a frequent critic of Google and Facebook and chief executive of Digital Content Next, a trade group that represents entertainment and news organizations, including The New York Times.

If you want a little more, you'll probably have to pay for a premium service, but that is a small investment compared to the capability it gives you.

In light of recent data breaches within the personal credit reporting industry, it's probably more important than ever to pay close attention to your personal credit profile.

However, keep in mind you'll probably end up paying more interest in the long run with these options — which may be worth it, in order to save you from a garnished tax refund and keep your loans in good standing.

Choosing a loan term of two or three years, for instance, probably will mean you'll pay more than your previous monthly minimums.

Of course, these jobs would be replaced by laundry jobs at private facilities, albeit probably fewer and they may not pay up to $ 20 an hour, and more for supervisors.

Interest rates may increase but probably not enough to make an impact to a CD that is up for renewal, Real estate income should increase over time but mostly a few percentage points here and there, I suppose you could manufacture more income by paying off one of the rentals assuming your income numbers are after expenses and not gross income.

In addition to paying PMI, you'll probably pay more interest.

If you want to make as much money as possible, your strategy will probably be more aggressive than someone who wants to conserve the buying power of their money, or turn in a steady stream of income from dividend - paying stocks.

If your loan accounts for more than 80 % of the property value, as determined by an appraiser, you will probably have to pay some form of insurance in order to close.

If the 15 - year mortgage accounts for more than 80 % of the purchase price, then you will probably be required to pay for private mortgage insurance.

I'm getting close to having my rental house paid off, probably 3 more years, at which point I will gain around $ 350 per month in «passive» income.

The primary disadvantage is that you'll probably end up with a higher mortgage rate, so you might pay more interest over the long term.

Think about it, a business consultant might charge $ 200 an hour (which is probably way more than what your job pays), but that's basically their limit!

But this latest market pullback — and quick recovery — has more people paying in attention than in a while (despite President Donald Trump's probably now regretful decision to talk about it frequently).

The «Kids are free» part is most likely a ploy to try getting more customers to come visit, after all... a free kid is likely to have a paying adult with him, and it probably only affects those 3 or 4 and under.

We can do everything that the church in the New Testament did without any pseudo-professional ministers drawing salaries to pay off their student loans, and the sad part is that we could probably do it much better and much more efficiently without any of these things.

The hilarity is that we're still paying for it, except we're probably winding up paying more in the end than we would have if we'd dealt with it upfront.

They probably have more knowledge about church weekends away than you do 5 / / Set up payment plans, allowing people to pay in instalments.

It hurts the bottom line to pay higher wages to more troubled workers who will probably do a somewhat worse job.

Guardiola was probably more than happy to wait until the summer and get a freebiie but in the light of Jesus's injury leaving him with only one striker would probably pay decent money to get him now and by now I don't mean January 31st!

And if a standalone committee actually pays attention to the job it is tasked to do, then it will probably work out more reliably than the Coaches or Harris polls.

He is more important to us than Pogba to Man U. Do the math of replacement cost for Sanchez and compare to the cost of wage increase and you realize it is a no brainer to pay him 300 per week rather than to spend 100 million on buy a replacement player who probably either doesn't exist or doesn't want to play for Arsene.

probably plenty more before them... Liedholm for one — but he's the first to explain it very straightforward) and that was when I paid more attention to football, the game itself.

Well if we failed we won't have won a trophy last season (FA cup would be used to blood youngsters), we won't have players like Alexis and Ozil come into the club, and we definitely would not be able to keep players like Cazorla, Walcott and Ramsey because we would probably be playing Europa league (or even not been in Europe) and still have probably 5 more years to go in paying of the stadium because we are not getting enough money into the club (no Champions league).

The problem is no one knows whats happening media makes up everything to sell papers, There is more than a good chance we have not offered the price they want and are probably haggling over a couple of mill, Do nt rate mahrez, Would rather pay more for lemar.

Let's face it goalkeepers tend to march to the beat of a different drum and Szczesny certainly fell into that category, but most of his antics were relatively harmless and simply reflected a certain level of immaturity that isn't uncommon for someone thrust into the limelight at such a young age... lord knows we've seen that happen with numerous players throughout the years and very few were ever banished for such behaviour... the only on - field action that drove me crazy was his inability to take a deep breath and not try to rush the play with an ill - timed throw at certain points in the game when common sense suggested holding the ball and slowing things down... the fact that he continued to do this probably had a lot to do with the glaring lack of coaching time spent with the goalkeepers... ultimately he made the fateful decision to take his frustrations out into the public sphere and paid dearly for it... in the end, his services were wanted by several of the best Italian squads, which is significant considering the historical importance placed on the defensive side of the ball in Serie A... all I know is that if someone asked me to pick the most athletically gifted goalkeeper we have had in our squad since the arrival of Wenger, without hesitation, he would be my pick and for that reason his departure is more than a little disappointing... what else is new though

On the other hand, she was paying this team to help her, and probably trusted them more than she should have.

Sancho — Sancho is good, this one doesn't make much sense Schmelzer — not a good player any more and also seems to be a coach - killer like Sahin Schürrle — Can't ever see him being more of a decent rotation option at BVB Toljan — I think Toljan is kinda crap but BVB are thin at fullback (esp if they get rid of Schmelzer) so probably should keep Weigl — if someone's willing to pay what they've been rumored to be willing to pay, see ya.

RM probably wants to sell Di Maria to PSG cuz they can pay more, but the one REALLY wanting the player is probably Man Utd.

He will be definately be paid more than Parker, and is probably a good starting point.

Probably, like too many others on our books, they get paid more they should, as moderate players.

He is probably in the top 100 paid employees in the world and has more than enough to retire and feed his grandchildren.

The entire Leicester squad probably costs little more than we paid for Ozil to assemble, and what I enjoy the most is that it's a complete mockery of Arsene Wenger's excuses that you can not compete if you don't spend ridiculous money, so we won't spend any and have an excuse.

Having seen up close with the Hurricanes, I'd probably pass on Jussi... he's got more skill than a 3rd line grinder, but his offensive ceiling isn't significantly higher than what guys like Brunner and Ryder already bring to justify having to pay him 3.5 to 4 mil.