Sentences with phrase «probably think of other»

I could probably think of other things I wouldn't like to be certain about.

I could probably think of other things if I set my mind to it!

A few score of us probably thought of each other as friends.

I could probably think of some others, but you get my point.

Not exact matches

It probably won't bring jetpacks and hoverboards, but it will usher in other radical technologies, business models, customer experiences and even a new breed of entrepreneurs — a wave of so - called digital natives who think and act differently from every generation before them.

But Square, particularly with the Snapchat deal, is in some ways hitting that goal from the other direction — by gathering a coalition of smaller businesses and services that probably no one had ever thought to wrap payments into to spread its brand.

You probably don't give it much thought, but your router is one of the most important gadgets in your home — without it there's no wi - fi for your laptops, your phones, and all the other web - connected devices you've got set up.

As another thought, I guess that if the trade surplus countries could not explictly bid up the currencies of other countries directly, they could probably do so indirectly by, say, exchanging their forex reserves for commodities.

At the risk of writing something cohesive, I'm just going to ramble a little here with some thoughts on GDP and the whole recession debate... these opinions and typos are strictly my own, except when I'm referencing other people's opinions, which I probably agree with.

While Brooks thinks gold probably is in a trading range that will keep it between $ 1,200 and $ 1,400, he sees plenty of opportunities in other metals such as platinum and palladium.

it is quite simple but by avoiding «in» and «out» strategies is probably a way to beat 90 % of market participants (who think they can outsmart each other).

Sean Williams (Intuitive Surgical): When most people think of stocks for a better tomorrow, so - called green companies probably come to mind, but for me, it's all about companies that are improving the lives of others.

But in the real world, I think atheists and people of varying faiths probably work together on various things for the good of mankind — often not really knowing fully about each others» beliefs, yet still accomplishing good things together.

Thinking about that I think your right.Or getting all this free attention to promote a book free.We got believers and non-belivbers & do n`t knows.I have a good idea, but I can not prove it.I think whatever or whoever created us exists on the other side of the universe.That would probably be infinity.Then infinity would have to have an intelligence to know all things.Some deep $ h1t man.lol

You probably know more than you think, and you can use that knowledge to help the Church and Body of Christ in ways that others simply can not.

Whether one agrees with his politics or thinks he'd be a competent president is a different matter — but thank you for writing a great article on religion and avoiding the attacking, degrading and slandering of other writers» approach, which - while probably provoking interest and getting many reads - is simply disappointing and quite frankly hypocritical when it comes to religion.

@Jake yeah I totally understand what you're saying, but if he didn't say anything about his beliefs, then I don't think he should be fired since he is being respectful of others beliefs and it probably wouldn't effect his work.

I think it is even possible that I might naturally feel compassion for other people (such as suffering people in China), but I would probably figure that this is some strange extension of a natural feeling of compassion which is a beneficial trait towards my children and my friends.

Others of you may think I've gone off the deep end, that I've rejected Christian orthodoxy, embraced relativism, and will probably run off to some Indian ashram to mediate for a few years with my fellow hippies.

Probably not, since most people usually don't think of Satan and the Messiah as having anything to do with each other.

In all probability you habitually exert a certain amount of self - discipline of your own thoughts and feelings, and probably you do not see why others can not readily do the same.

In addition to shaping Christian thought through his voluminous publications («Fundamentalism» and the Word of God, Evangelism and the Sovereignty of God, and A Quest for Godliness, to name only three of the most popular), he helped steer the flagship Evangelical magazine Christianity Today, spoke at countless Evangelical conferences and local churches, mentored hundreds of future pastors through his seminary teaching, and lent his name to the back covers of more Evangelical books than probably any other Christian endorser ever.

The reasons for such sermonic silence are varied, ranging probably from a fear of being thought morbid through a fear of sounding other - worldly to a fear of not knowing what to say on so moot a subject.

If I accepted the present goal of the science of economics, I might still complain that it would be good to think about it, but I would probably be talking with you about some other topic.

I'm sure you're a good Muslim and you probably think its your duty to warn the others, but let me warn you spreading rumour is against the teaching of Islam.

I think, for instance, of Chuck Colson, who did more than any other man in the last probably 100 years in American life in calling the Church to remember prisoners and to think about implications of the justice system.

Moreover, he has probably given more prolonged and intensive thought to the ontological argument than any other philosopher in history, and his studies have contributed notably to a recent revival of interest in it.

Whitehead's greatness actually lies in that he knew these two possible ways of thinking as probably no other philosopher before him and decided unequivocally for the latter.

Jesus, if he existed, was probably just a cool dude with some peaceful concept, much like Gandhi, Martin Luther King and a host of very real flesh and bone individuals who happened to be crucified in their own way for thinking by themselves and caring for other.

CC: I think in a full - bodied system one would want both a relation of overlap or extending over and probably also a relation of resonance or recapitulation between durations which did not extend over each other.

Semety... I think that the question of whether my acts are good or bad is probably left for others to decide, but wdn't it be bad to repay a genuinely virtuous act with such a disclaimer as in,» Thanks for yr kindness, but let me remind you that yr still a filthy sinner.»

I think that without the bible, these morals could have developed, mostly out of self preservation (we wouldn't last so long if everyone was going around killing each other) but probably would have taken much longer to develop universality.

The same people who think only men should be pastors, probably have other (hidden) criteria related to sexuality and gender — in my experience, a majority of pastors are straight, married, cisgender men.

Although they did not say so, they were probably also disturbed by the thought of the loneliness that would follow if one survived the other.

So don't take it personal, just everyone please STOP repeating untruths or partial truths like mantras, thinking if you just keep repeating them that they will become TRUE... they are still NOT TRUE and your doing the same thing you probably are accusing others of doing.

Who does Jeffress think he is to criticize the beliefs of others when he is probably in the religion game for the money?

I think it's important for me to say... and this probably deserves a whole different post... that just because I draw pictures of Jesus, it doesn't necessarily mean I believe that there was the historical Jesus as presented in the gospels or that Jesus is alive today in the way evangelicals or Catholics or others believe.

So I thought, I should probably share my gram measurements for your recipe with others who don't get the hang of cups and ounces: 16g dry yeast or one cube (42g) of fresh yeast) 125g warm water 450 (works for me)-500 g water 85g molasses 62g apple cider vinegar 50g butter 28g dark unsweetened chocolate (seems to be nonexistant in Germany, I used 90 % cocoa) 100g whole wheat flour 375g dark rye flour (I used homeground, so pumpernickl for the Americans, medium rye might pack denser) 385g bread flour (German Type812 didn't have other, should correspond to American AP or light bread flour) 120g bran 10g carraway 3g fennel 1 double shot of espresso (didn't want to buy powder, so no grams here, sorry) half a small shallot, chopped 14g salt

No, I realized my dream baked ziti would probably not be ziti at all (I think other chunky pastas pick up sauce better), but a chunky, craggy deconstructed lasagna with all of the important parts played up — browned crunchy edges for miles, hearty chunks of sausage and thick green vegetables.

My thinking is that if the rest of your diet is very clean (generally no processed foods at all, so no other source of these glutamate neurotoxins) it's probably fine to indulge in an occasion slice or two of bread made with xanthan gum.

«I was surprised when I heard people talking so much about Swiss chard because I think that cauliflower probably has a bigger chance of being a rival for kale than other veggies.»

Probably that approach would be the opposite of the «Man, Can, Plan» books — and I entirely understand if you would prefer that route — but I thought I'd at least mention this «other» side of cooking, because it would demystify much of the process.

Chowders, typically rich and creamy with chunks of seafood and vegetables, probably originated in France (since it's thought the word «chowder» comes from «chaudiere», the pot fishermen used for cooking their catch up with potatoes and other vegetables), and...

I'd've probably never thought of doing anything with this candy other than gobbling it right up!

u are completly right Bob, in that we are way behind.i mean even look at the likes of Everton.and yes like others in the comments i think players like Lemar,Mahrez,Carvalho,Martins - if all are signed - and Sanchez left intact, can make the change.but Wenger and Kroenke, being Wenger and Kroenke, that is very unlikely to happen, and we will be left behind, as always, and probably an even more disastrous season awaits us

He probably, and at best, thinks we need to sign an other player to fill in for Welbeck, but he didn't even rate Welbeck ahead of Giroud.

I think our record against City is probably the best out of all our games against other teams like Chelsea, United etc so this is why I think we have a chance.

Granted, current combined membership of 17 teams is an awkward number (Utah State would probably be up for a move if given the opportunity), but considering Hawaii and East Carolina (or Fresno State and Marshall) would not be playing each other very often, this is not as much of a geographical nightmare as one would think.

I think that others should be talking of your success and if you have to remind them of it, than it's probably to hide recent failures.

Most people who know me mention Arsenal at some point when they see me, they probably think of me when they see Arsenal mentioned at other times.