One of the best reviewed films of the year (it placed fourth in our our survey), Haynes excels in the smallest moments, the tactile particulars of period wardrobe, the longing in a look, the flashes of light across a window, charged details that accumulate an emotional power that pushes the film far beyond its sketchy social
problem film plot toward a devastatingly romantic transcendence.
Not exact matches
I think the
problem is that the
film arrived before local industries set their rules on this, says the helmer about South Korean exhibitors demanding Teen
film is a
film genre targeted at teenagers and young adults in which the
plot is based upon the special interests of teenagers and young adults, such
But there are
problems in Wakanda, not all stemming from the
film's few white characters: CIA man Everett Ross (Martin Freeman) blunders into Wakandan power politics, and white South African career criminal Ulysses Klaue (Andy Serkis)
plots to steal their vibranium.
The
film still suffers from a muddy narrative and dour outlook, but this extended version corrects a number of
problems with
plotting and expands the DC Comics universe with better character development and world building.
I understand that this is a
film that loves music (and I can see that), but, one
problem I have with some
films is the crime they commit of taking a
plot that has been used over and over again and just rehashes it without adding anything new.
However, the biggest
problem lies in the poor execution of the
plot and highly unimaginative
film making.
Most of this
problem is chalked up to the lazy
plotting, and even lazier meta - humor the
film tries to inject into its efforts.
The
film has its
problems, including a slow middle where it tries - unsuccessfully - to suddenly recap
plot points and resolve character motivations from the first three Craig
films.
The bewildering dearth of sea monsters is the least of the
film's
problems, bogged down by a boring
plot, cheesy jokes and an incredibly annoying new character that's crammed down the audience's throat.
Whether the
film would work with a straightforward timeline is uncertain, but Muccino's decision works in the
film's favour — by encouraging a guessing game it conceals the
problems of its
plot in a sleight of hand magic trick.
This is very much a character - driven piece, rather than
plot - driven (though there are some dramatic
plot twists) and the
problem with this
film is that the characters are simply unlikeable.
That connection between Isaac and Portman's characters is a crucial
plot point in the
film, but in practice, it's half - compelling and half - restraining, simply because marital
problems are so much more familiar and banal than everything else going on.
The main
problem with this
film is that they are simply so banal and nondescript that it's hard to focus on the
plot.
Not that Edwards»
film fails because it's short on
plot — there's certainly much bigger
problems to address.
The
problems with Hemsworth and Casey's characters are emblematic of Ghostbusters» greater sins; whenever the
film focuses on the innate charm and charisma of its leading ladies, it is often wildly entertaining, but when the
plot rears its ugly head, everything falls apart.
One of the big
problems of the
film lies in the opening credit sequence, where several
plot elements are introduced without explanation, and then never answered.
A breakthrough
film for several young Asian performers, the
problems with Better Luck Tomorrow begin and end with the passivity of protagonist Ben (Parry Shen), who, when asked to provide the violent
plot point that propels the
film to its conclusion, breaks out of character so mortally the
film never recovers.
Consenting Adults is a tawdry and not - too - clever thriller that has one critical
problem with the
plot that unfortunately I can't reveal much of without going into major spoilers (can a
film this rotten actually be spoiled?).
The
problem with
films that rely on
plot - twists is that the audience is already second - guessing everything they see, trying to work out the surprise ending before its properly revealed.
The quasi-Biblical (or Greek)
plot follows two brothers who are like night and day, Dave (Jeroen Perceval who wrote the play the
film is based on) is a kind soul who works in a carwash and is trying to set up a home with his girlfriend Sylvie (Veerle Baetens), the
problem is she was his brother Kenneth's (Kevin Janssens) girl before he went away to prison.
Voice acting is adequate without having any standouts, and the aforementioned
problems with
plot and direction curse this
film to the bee - list at best.
Perhaps the
film needn't have encroached close to the three - hour mark to tell its tale, as side characters played by Cuba Gooding Jr (Daddy Day Camp, Norbit), who portrays «Mr. Untouchable» Nicky Barnes, and Kevin Corrigan (Superbad, The Dog
Problem) feel more like pit stops for character contrast than crucial characters to push the
plot forward.
The
problem is that Johnson doesn't stick with his own formula and allows the
film to convolute itself into an anti-climactic melange of
plot hoops and hurtles that are meant to be clever, but by the limping third act, end up robbing the
film of the magic it was oh - so close to conjuring.
The
problem is exacerbated by the fact that he keeps dropping out of the story completely for long periods of time, only to be awkwardly shunted back into the
plot while the
film nervously assures us that he really is relevant to this story, and on top of that, there's also an incredibly forced and out - of - place romantic subplot which the
film really would have been much better without.
The overall
plot is too disjointed and too long, which was a
problem for other Prohibition - era
films such as 2012's Lawless.
**** Zachary F November 29, 2012 this movie is sooo funny Jon C November 29, 2012 a fun, crude, and hilarious comedy two girl roomates formulate a plan to make their own sex hotline in order to make ends meet hijinks and raw laughs ensue between two very different people who embrace their sexuality via telephone the performances from both Graynor and Miller are pretty damn fun to watch the dialogue is insanely funny and gratuitous there's a very strange cameo in here too by Nia Vardalos Justin Long adds a nice touch being the supporting gay best friend mentoring these two girls it's just very awkwardly humorous listening to these people talk in this kind of
film, there's interestingly no actual sex happening on screen, no boobs, no ass, no exposed body parts the
plot mainly focuses on the bonding relationship bewteen the two leads which is a good break from the usual norm we're used to I can't help but feel though that the filmmakers didn't have anything left at the end, some of it felt unfinished and unresolved for all those
problems, «For A Good Time, Call..»
The
problem with the
film isn't in its placement in the realm of science fiction
films as much as its placement in the real world, where the
plot necessitates a triple - jump for every leap in logic to get us from point A to Z. For instance, the
film pushes forward the notion that scientists don't give any thought or research whatsoever to the ramifications of their inventions before unleashing them on the world at large.
As you can see the
plot for Nima Nourizadeh's
film is threadbare to put it lightly, and that is the first of its
problems.
He kept it up until the end of the
film and so did the script (for the most part — when it had
problems again, they were of the predictable
plotting variety).
While it's not on the level of «bomb» (or «After Earth») as I was fearing, «Focus» is completely underwhelming, with an average
plot that is rarely unpredictable, a big
problem for a
film about con artists.
The
problem with Harry Potter 4 is that it's free of subtext for the most part, content to worry itself with sappy love
plots punctuated now and then by special effects set - pieces that revert to the first
film's tendency to stop the action to allow the cast and the audience to gape, slack - jawed, at the spectacle.
To my dismay, what didn't work in the last
film also is the
problem with this third installment: the characters are wafer - thin eccentrics, the
plot meanders, and the situations remain unmoving.
Ah, the eternal
problem of the spoiler warning... You never want to give away too much
plot in a
film review — but then,
plot isn't always the biggest thing that you would ideally want to keep fresh for the viewer.
Based on Brian Selznick's children's novel, just like Martin Scorsese's Hugo, Wonderstruck suffers from the same
problem as Scorsese's
film: mainly, that it's based on a kid's book that's mostly pictures and therefore
plotted around a central twist neither surprising nor instructive.
Another major
problem is that the
plot is way too similar to the first two
films.
Though the writers strike caused
problems, the
film had script
problems that should have been sorted out long before (this is a Bond
film where the
plot revolves around a utilities contract), and Forster's handling of the action was fairly poor, despite the presence of «Bourne» action supremo Dan Bradley as second - unit director.
The
problem here is that the whole
plot hinges on a twist that has been done several times in
films in recent years (Fight Club most notably), including a similarly delusional Coen Brothers
film about writer's block that also starred John Turturro (Barton Fink — probably the reason he was cast in this
film).
Two of the bigger
problems with the some of the previous
films have been either A) the filmmakers» attempt to cram too much from the books into a too brief running time — Goblet of Fire — or B) the total exclusion of necessary
plot points and scenes to fit said running time — Alfonso Cuaron's Prisoner of Azkaban.
But since the main
problems of the
film's
plot have been solved, we're stuck fighting a loser squad instead of A-listers like the Lizard.
That
problem extends into the
film adaptation, a stripped - down, unemphatic version of the story that streamlines the book's
plot and alters the ending, but nonetheless preserves many of its biggest faults.