Although Whitehead has successfully avoided the traditional
problem of evil by his dipolar doctrine of God, he seems to have presented us with another problem of evil in the sense that God is not only unavoidably implicated in the actions of finite occasions, but to the extent that pleasure is realized by occasions God derives enjoyment in his consequent nature also.
In recent years numerous attempts have been made to solve the ancient
problem of evil by way of a Given within the nature of God, the assertion of «the demonic» in the world (its metaphysical status being somewhat cloudy), or a forthright reinstatement of the existence of a personal devil.
Our Father Abraham: Jewish Roots of the Christian Faith by Marvin R. Wilson, Jewish Spirituality: A Brief Introduction for Christians by Lawrence Kushner, The Myth of a Christian Nation by Greg Boyd, The Politics of Jesus by John Howard Yoder, Decision Making and the Will of God by Gary Friesen, Satan and
the Problem of Evil by Greg Boyd, A Concise History of the Crusades by Thomas Madden, and Manifest Destiny: American Expansion and the Empire of Right by Anders Stephanson.
The classical theist indicts the process theist for «solving»
the problem of evil by forfeiting a meaningful notion of divine omnipotence while the process theist indicts the classical theist for proposing a view of divine omnipotence that makes the problem of evil unsolvable.
Not exact matches
The story has been that the
evil one - percenters,
by extension corporate America, and
by extension the business community, has been the cause
of all
of America's
problems.
The
problem of course is that Coyne's piece relies heavily on commentary from local civically illiterate crank and guaranteed quote machine Duff Conacher, for whom everything is
evil and wrong, and why he hasn't yet been labelled a vexatious litigant
by the courts is beyond me.
as an atheist, you face a different «
problem of evil» than that faced
by Christians.
It can be argued, however, that to minimize the miraculous and thereby conclude that what occurs in nature in relation to particular persons can not be controlled
by God alleviates the
problem of natural
evil only up to a point.
Reviewing a book titled The Son
of Man written
by François Mauriac (a French Roman Catholic who wrote about the
problems of good and
evil in human nature and in the world), Flannery O'Connor writes: He proposes in the place
of that anguish that Gide called the Catholic's «cramp....
A doctrine challenged
by science can be abandoned; a commandment that clashes with modern attitudes ignored; the
problem of evil washed away in a New Age bath.»
His chapter on prayer was one
of the best treatments
of prayer I have ever read, right up there with the essays on prayer
by C.S. Lewis and the chapter on praying in the Whirlwind in Greg Boyd's Satan & the
Problem of Evil.
According to Noddings, history (including philosophy, theology, politics, societal structures) up to this point has obscured the nature
of the
problem of evil because all systems for dealing with it have been created, elaborated, and promoted
by and for males.
Although I am very far from subscribing to the doctrine
of the total depravity
of man, it does seem to me to have been proved within my own lifetime that the
problem of human
evil is not much affected
by better education, better housing, higher wages, holidays with pay, and the National Health Service — desirable as all these things may be for other good reasons.
It seems to have been proved within out time that the
problem of human
evil is not much affected
by better education, better housing, higher wages, and holidays with pay — desirable as all these things may be for other good reasons.
In our January - February issue we republished an article
by Fr Edward Holloway about the
problem of evil.
The free will argument is a lame tactic used
by apologists in an attempt to address the
problem of evil.
But you have no
problem twisting decades - old, oft debunked junk science into» proof» that there is an
evil secret agenda driven
by thousands
of health professionals, distinguished mental health physicians, and the gay community at large.
The
problem with blaming all this on faith or religion is that it hides the true culprits: fear, hatred, and selfishness — which culprits are leveraged
by evil leaders
of groups like ISIS.
This is partly because I accept the view that even our natural theology is inevitably a Christian natural theology, in the sense suggested
by John Cobb, and partly because some
of the doctrines that should be placed under the more strictly Christian aspect, such as the
problem of evil, are not as strictly limited to Christian theology as are some others, such as christology.
I know all the difficulties which confront theism — especially the
problem of evil — but I am sure that Professor William Montague was right when he said that the chance
of atheistic materialism's being true would have to be represented
by a fraction, with one for the numerator and a denominator that would reach from here to the fixed stars.
There is no «
problem of evil» for this mechanistic and deterministic view
of the world, for the place
of God is finally taken altogether
by blind chance, causality, and impersonal law.
Most, perhaps all, cultures and religious traditions have some version
of the
problem of evil, but as C. S. Lewis wrote in The Problem of Pain, this problem becomes scandalous in Christianity, which traditionally has held that the universe is governed by a loving and omnipote
problem of evil, but as C. S. Lewis wrote in The
Problem of Pain, this problem becomes scandalous in Christianity, which traditionally has held that the universe is governed by a loving and omnipote
Problem of Pain, this
problem becomes scandalous in Christianity, which traditionally has held that the universe is governed by a loving and omnipote
problem becomes scandalous in Christianity, which traditionally has held that the universe is governed
by a loving and omnipotent God.
Despite the fact that leading process theists have devoted a substantial part
of their writings to the discussion
of evil, we find publication after publication
by philosophers on the
problem of...
By this means, Hartshorne has paved the way for excitingly new possibilities for contemporary theological grappling with the age - old
problem of evil.
It is in coming to terms with the death
of Jesus that we find an answer to our search for meaning, in face
of the complex nature
of finite existence and the
problems raised
by evil, suffering and death.
The basic
problem to which Paul addresses himself in this passage is the prevalence
of sin and
evil in the world created good
by God.
By 1983, John Hick had included, in his justly influential introduction to the philosophy
of religion, process theodicy as one
of three main Christian responses to the
problem of evil (Hick 41; Griffin, Evil
evil (Hick 41; Griffin,
EvilEvil 1).
The CENTURY addressed other personal sins and moral failings, regularly speaking to the
problems caused
by lax divorce laws, and occasionally writing about the
evils of gambling, tobacco, and the «sex consciousness» that would accompany the «vociferous demand for the teaching
of sex hygiene» in public schools.
I believe that we can illuminate the
problem of evil not only
by recognizing that there are other creative agents
of action (a reinterpretation
of the omnipotence
of God) but also
by recognizing that destructiveness is an essential part
of creativity (a reinterpretation
of the goodness
of God).
This optimistic approach to man's virtue and the
problem of evil expresses itself philosophically as the idea
of progress in history.17 The empirical method
of modern culture has been successful in understanding nature; but, when applied to an understanding
of human nature, it was blind to some obvious facts about human nature that simpler cultures apprehended
by the wisdom
of common sense.
(Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1997); E. W. Kenyon, In His Presence: The Secret
of Prayer (Kenyon Publishing Society, 1999); E. W. Kenyon, Jesus the Healer (Kenyon Gospel Publishing Society, 2000); E. W. Kenyon, The Hidden Man (WA: Kenyon Publishing Society, 1998); E. W. Kenyon, The Wonderful Name
of Jesus (Kenyon's Gospel Publishing Society, 1998); John Baker, Celebrate Recovery (CA: Celebrate Recovery Books, 1994); Bob and Pauline Bartosch, Overcomers Outreach: A Bridge to Recovery (La Habra, CA: Overcomers Outreach, 1994); Cathy Burns, Alcoholics Anonymous Unmasked (PA: Sharing, 1991); Cal Chambers, Two Tracks - One Goal (British Columbia: Credo Publishing Corporation, 1992); Martin M. Davis, The Gospel and the Twelve Steps (San Diego, CA: RPI Publishing Inc., 1993); Len C. Freeland, author
of Chapter 28, «The Salvation Army» in (Alcoholism: The Total Treatment Approach, edited
by Ronald J. Catanzaro IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 1968); Mark H. Graeser, John A. Lynn, John W. Schoenheit, Don't Blame God: A Biblical Answer to the
Problem of Evil, Sin and Suffering.
Of course, he is by no means unaware of such difficulties, as is clear from the admission already cited and clearer still from his statement elsewhere, that, as compared with the traditional problem of evil, «there are other difficulties in theism» that he at least finds «more formidable.&raqu
Of course, he is
by no means unaware
of such difficulties, as is clear from the admission already cited and clearer still from his statement elsewhere, that, as compared with the traditional problem of evil, «there are other difficulties in theism» that he at least finds «more formidable.&raqu
of such difficulties, as is clear from the admission already cited and clearer still from his statement elsewhere, that, as compared with the traditional
problem of evil, «there are other difficulties in theism» that he at least finds «more formidable.&raqu
of evil, «there are other difficulties in theism» that he at least finds «more formidable.»
Original Sin then - that overlooked but vital doctrine
of the reality
of our state, and the introduction into the material universe for the first time
of «the
problem of evil» - teaches the rupturing
of that living, holy communion
of good
by which, from the first pair, men were to minister life and fulfilment to one another through Christ.
Process theism,
by relinquishing the claim that God could completely control the world in order to overcome the
problem of present
evil, can not have this traditional assurance about the future.
One has heard
of a certain seminary professor who teaches his students that «God can not be called almighty because
of the
problem posed
by evil, but unsurpassable, yes, certainly».
The great
problems of history with which we must come to terms tend to appear to us not as members
of a chain organically tied to the past and growing into the future, but as cataclysmic interruptions
of the normalcy
of peace and harmony, occasioned
by evil men and
evil institutions.
And the
problem of evil, he contends, can be defeated
by identifying validity or soundness
problems or even
by appealing to the fact that «experts think it is unsound, or that the experts are evenly divided as to its soundness» (PP 3: 312).
To him, man's root
problem was his existence in
evil matter ruled
by a heartless law
of tooth and fang.
Accordingly, since the purpose
of Griffin's goal is not simply to defend his own approach to the
problem of evil but to argue that «the [defensive] strategy proposed
by Plantinga is inadequate» (ER 47), the fact that Griffin has misidentified the basis for Plantinga's position is significant.
I knew the «Christian response» to the
Problem of Evil like the back
of my hand, but it somehow didn't make as much sense in India, where I struggled to understand why so many children had been orphaned
by AIDS.
Whatever else might be the explanation
of the mystery, it was not to be found in blaming a prince
of darkness, a kind
of second deity and god
of evil, as though
by thrusting back the
problem to such a personage the
problem itself could be even a little solved.
The
problem is not guns... its that our society has fallen away from God And there is a lot
of sin and
evil which is perpetuated
by a generation that has little time for God
(Malachi 2:17) found an eloquent voice, and the spiritual insights
by which the seers
of Israel had tried to illumine the age - long
problem of evil faced derisive denial.
(See H. V. Williams Jackson: «Ahriman» in Encyclopædia
of Religion and Ethics, edited
by James Hastings) The
problem of evil was thus carried back to a precedent, continuous conflict in the cosmos, with God and his attendant hosts
of angels contending against the prince
of darkness and his devils.
Whitehead, then, was aware
of the manner
by which solutions to the
problem of evil can minimize
evil as a way to make it compatible with the reality
of a just and omnipotent God.
From the perspective
of process theology, Haught also addresses the
problem of evil as amplified
by evolutionary thought, with its eons
of struggle and extinction.
(See the
Problem of Evil in Process Theism and Classical Free - Will Theism
by William Hasker; Traditional Free Will Theodicy and Process Theodicy: Hasker's Claim for Parity; «Bitten to Death
by Ducks»: A Reply to Griffin; On Hasker's Defense
of his Parity Claim
by David Ray Griffin (see www.religion-online.org.)
Here, the advantage
of using a fictional approach is that we become quite close to the characters affected
by the «
Problem of Evil» and so we are less inclined to resort to our theological expertise in explaining it away.
Success achieved
by good means can be overlooked ethically, but success
by means
of evil poses
problems.
In the light
of this broader description
of evil we should reformulate the theodicy
problem so as to ask not only about the justification
of disorder in a world created
by an allegedly all - good and all - powerful God, but also about a world that seemingly can not exist apart from an intrinsic adventurousness.