I think that just about everyone would agree that these explanations fall short whenever we personally encounter
the Problem of Evil in our lives and in the lives of our fellow human beings.
(See
the Problem of Evil in Process Theism and Classical Free - Will Theism by William Hasker; Traditional Free Will Theodicy and Process Theodicy: Hasker's Claim for Parity; «Bitten to Death by Ducks»: A Reply to Griffin; On Hasker's Defense of his Parity Claim by David Ray Griffin (see www.religion-online.org.)
Although Whitehead has successfully avoided the traditional problem of evil by his dipolar doctrine of God, he seems to have presented us with
another problem of evil in the sense that God is not only unavoidably implicated in the actions of finite occasions, but to the extent that pleasure is realized by occasions God derives enjoyment in his consequent nature also.
Whitehead's cosmology in general and his solution for
the problem of evil in particular do not transform all evils into merely apparent evils.
Why there is
the problem of evil in the world.
The biblical answer to
the problem of evil in human history is a radical answer, precisely because human evil is recognized as a much more stubborn fact than is realized in some modern versions of the Christian faith.
The problem of evil in such matters is not the intellectual question of why a good God lets these things happen.
The weight of
the problem of evil in the black church was not located primarily in terms of God's need to justify himself in view of the presence of suffering in the world.
In her new book Women and Evil, Nell Noddings attempts to look at
the problem of evil in a new light — a specifically feminine, or rather feminist, light.
The most common form of this phenomenon is the reaction to
the problem of evil in its classical formulation.
Not exact matches
I have no
problem with the concept
of «do no
evil»
in business.
One
problem is that we find ourselves back
in the garden
of Eden when the serpent said to Eve you will be wise like God knowing good and
evil.
In his December 10, 2009, Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, President Barack Obama offered a vigorous defense of the just war tradition in response to problems of evil and injustice in the worl
In his December 10, 2009, Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, President Barack Obama offered a vigorous defense
of the just war tradition
in response to problems of evil and injustice in the worl
in response to
problems of evil and injustice
in the worl
in the world.
If the ability to do this is necessary for a viable theodicy as Griffin implies, it would seem to follow that it is
in fact possible to answer the
problem of evil within classical limits — i.e., without having to resort to Griffin's process conceptuality.
It can be argued, however, that to minimize the miraculous and thereby conclude that what occurs
in nature
in relation to particular persons can not be controlled by God alleviates the
problem of natural
evil only up to a point.
Reviewing a book titled The Son
of Man written by François Mauriac (a French Roman Catholic who wrote about the
problems of good and
evil in human nature and
in the world), Flannery O'Connor writes: He proposes
in the place
of that anguish that Gide called the Catholic's «cramp....
I abandoned that when I realized most
in that «organization» had THEIR heads
in the sand, oblivious or uncaring about the
problem of evil.
A doctrine challenged by science can be abandoned; a commandment that clashes with modern attitudes ignored; the
problem of evil washed away
in a New Age bath.»
His chapter on prayer was one
of the best treatments
of prayer I have ever read, right up there with the essays on prayer by C.S. Lewis and the chapter on praying
in the Whirlwind
in Greg Boyd's Satan & the
Problem of Evil.
It is worth pointing out
in response that anyone who thinks Christians have never grappled with the
problem of evil can never have noticed that the crucifix is the central symbol
of Christian faith.
In our January - February issue we republished an article by Fr Edward Holloway about the
problem of evil.
In Christianity the problem of evil, for example, is not an illusion which is to be escaped but the occasion for responsibility in this world, for struggle, and for ultimate victor
In Christianity the
problem of evil, for example, is not an illusion which is to be escaped but the occasion for responsibility
in this world, for struggle, and for ultimate victor
in this world, for struggle, and for ultimate victory.
The
problem is that the attackers no matter that they were a minority ot not, carried out that
evil act
in the name
of a religion.
The free will argument is a lame tactic used by apologists
in an attempt to address the
problem of evil.
In so doing, as she recognizes, the reality
of evil remains a serious
problem.
Although my studies at these two schools introduced me to the scope and depth
of Western thought on the issue
of evil, the way
in which the
problem was defined was quite different from its definition
in the black church.
Likewise, wrestle as we may with the
problem of evil, the heart
of the matter is found
in the great refrain
of this Genesis story after the account
of each «day»
of creation, which says, «And God saw that it was good.»
Christian Century reviewers also disagreed: Samuel Terrien thought that J. B. presented «modern man's reaction to the
problem of evil without the category
of faith
in a loving God» (January 7, 1959, p. 9); Tom F. Driver found the play afflicted with «a sort
of theological schizophrenia,» divided between its religious and humanistic dimensions (January 7, 1959.
This point about freedom is a standard ingredient
in Whiteheadian discussions
of the
problem of evil.
This is partly because I accept the view that even our natural theology is inevitably a Christian natural theology,
in the sense suggested by John Cobb, and partly because some
of the doctrines that should be placed under the more strictly Christian aspect, such as the
problem of evil, are not as strictly limited to Christian theology as are some others, such as christology.
Buber's philosophy
of dialogue has made possible a new understanding
of the
problem of evil because it has reaffirmed the basic significance
of the personal relation between the Absolute, the world, and man as against the tendency to submerge man
in a mechanistic universe or to reduce God to an impersonal and indirect first cause, an abstract monistic absolute, or an immanent vital force.
In recent years numerous attempts have been made to solve the ancient problem of evil by way of a Given within the nature of God, the assertion of «the demonic» in the world (its metaphysical status being somewhat cloudy), or a forthright reinstatement of the existence of a personal devi
In recent years numerous attempts have been made to solve the ancient
problem of evil by way
of a Given within the nature
of God, the assertion
of «the demonic»
in the world (its metaphysical status being somewhat cloudy), or a forthright reinstatement of the existence of a personal devi
in the world (its metaphysical status being somewhat cloudy), or a forthright reinstatement
of the existence
of a personal devil.
A third area
in which we need very much more
of theological preaching is the deeper and more serious aspect
of the
problem of evil, namely, sin.
Yet the reality underlying the
problem of evil is present all the time and
in intensified form.
In theology and philosophy the
problem of evil is ordinarily treated under the two headings
of natural and moral
evil.
The
problem of evil is significant not primarily because
of one's conscious concept
of evil but because
of the total attitude expressed
in the whole
of one's life and thought.
In the Preface to Images
of Good and
Evil Buber writes that he has been preoccupied with the problem of evil since his yo
Evil Buber writes that he has been preoccupied with the
problem of evil since his yo
evil since his youth.
Most, perhaps all, cultures and religious traditions have some version
of the
problem of evil, but as C. S. Lewis wrote in The Problem of Pain, this problem becomes scandalous in Christianity, which traditionally has held that the universe is governed by a loving and omnipote
problem of evil, but as C. S. Lewis wrote
in The
Problem of Pain, this problem becomes scandalous in Christianity, which traditionally has held that the universe is governed by a loving and omnipote
Problem of Pain, this
problem becomes scandalous in Christianity, which traditionally has held that the universe is governed by a loving and omnipote
problem becomes scandalous
in Christianity, which traditionally has held that the universe is governed by a loving and omnipotent God.
in The Southern Journal
of Philosophy, 17, 1 (1979), 133 - 143; and «An Aesthetic Solution to the
Problem of Evil,»
in International Journal for Philosophy
of Religion, 35 (1994), 21 - 37.
The theological postures
of Kaplan and Whitehead have the virtue
of undercutting the
problem of evil, for the
problem only arises
in acute form if God is conceived
of as omnipotent — a view which both Whitehead and Kaplan repudiate.
In Israel, the pull toward disobedience required a doctrine
of a tempter, and the injustices
of life confronted man with an insoluble
problem of evil.
The Christian has found
in the cross the key to the
problem of the tragic element
of evil which comes to light
in man's inhumanity to man, war, oppression, hatred, greed and famine.
Both thinkers adamantly reject the concept
of Divine omnipotence,
in part due to their acute sensitivity to the
problem of evil.
And so again: «Whitehead does not give a satisfactory solution to the
problem of evil because he has not shown that God is good
in the important sense that he cherishes individuals and their values» (p. 50).
The final
problem for the progressive view is that
of the actual fact
of the persistence
of evil in all the structures
of human history.
Ely's more detailed analysis and discussion
of the religious aspects
of Whitehead's God pertain to three central
problems as they function
in Whitehead's thought: [1) the preservation
of values (God's consequent or concrete nature); (2) the transmutation
of evil into good (which includes the
problems of evil and God's goodness); and (3) the
problem of the relation
of God's goodness and the preservation
of the individual as such.
You can find out my replies to all these verses
in God
of the Possible, Satan and the
Problem of Evil or reknew.org (the Q & A section).
The
problem of modern man is not that
of finding deliverance from the unseen powers
of evil, or from the burden
of guilt, but is the search for meaning
in human existence.
Whitehead's metaphysical system led to Hartshorne's exploring the theological implications surrounding the
problem of evil and the necessity to reinterpret the omnipotence
of God as understood
in Thomism.
It is
in coming to terms with the death
of Jesus that we find an answer to our search for meaning,
in face
of the complex nature
of finite existence and the
problems raised by
evil, suffering and death.