Any judgment on human nature runs into
the problem of human differences.
Not exact matches
Goldilocks Economy Goldilocks is one
of those lovely fairy tale girls who can't seem to stay out
of trouble or distinguish the
difference between
humans and wildlife (Little Red Riding Hood also had this
problem).
The
problem is that a basic tenet
of classical liberalism — a tenet generally accepted in the Western world by «liberals,» as well as by many «conservatives» — is that
differences regarding fundamental principles
of human nature and morality are not a threat to social and political life.
With respect to the
problem of power in relation to
human sexual differentiation, I am not concerned to defend either traditional or modern versions
of the roles
of men and women, or to deny or affirm their distinctive natures, regardless
of whether these
differences are understood to be inherent or culturally derived.
The crucial
difference between two ways
of looking at
human problems is the
difference between trying to manage history according to plan, and a responsible planning within a history which is more successfully dealt with when we recognize the unmanageable factors within it.
In 2007, researchers published the first randomized, controlled study
of the effect
of being raised in an orphanage; that study, and subsequent research on the same sample
of Romanian orphans, found that compared with babies placed with a foster family, those who were sent to institutions had lower IQs, slower physical growth,
problems with
human attachment and
differences in functioning in brain areas related to emotional development.
In
humans, a
difference of only 0.2 pH units in the blood can lead to extreme health
problems.
Humans are not as gifted in this area
of course, but the young field
of regenerative medicine promises to solve a plethora
of medical
problems, making it a compelling career choice for any scientist who seeks to really «make a
difference.»
My naïve plan to make a
difference by treating one animal at a time evaporated when I saw first - hand the enormity
of the
problems of human poverty, habitat loss, and politics versus science.
Health improvement (allowing to post - pone / escape the diseases and thus live, healthier / disease - free longer, but not above
human MLSP
of around 122 years; thus these therapies do not affect epigenetic aging whatsoever, they are degenerative aging
problems not regular healthy aging
problem (except OncoSENS - only when you Already Have Cancer - which cancer increases epigenetic aging, but cancer removal thus does not change anything / makes no
difference about what happens in the other cells / about what happens in the normal epigenetic «aging» course in Normal non-cancerous healthy cells) Although there is not such thing as «healthy aging» all aging in «unhealthy» (as seen from elders who are «healthy enough» who show much damage), it's just «tolerable / liveable» enough (in terms
of damage accumulating) that it does not affect their quality
of life (enough yet), that is «healthy aging»: ApoptoSENS - Clearing Senescent Cells (this will have great impact to reduce diseases, the largest one, since it's all inflammation fueled by the inflammation secretory phenotype (SASP)
of these senescent cells) AmyloSENS - Dissolving the Plaques (this will allow
humans to evade Alzheimer's, Parkinsons and general brain degenerescence, allowing quite a boost; making people much more easily reach the big 100 - since the brain is causal to how long we live; keeping brain amyloid - free and keeping our memories / neuron sharp / means longer LongTerm Potentiation - means longer brain function means longer heavy brain mass (gray matter / white matter retention seen in «sharp - witted» Centenarians who show are younger brain for their age), and both are correlated to MLSP).
We need to realize how diverse
human genetics is becoming in terms
of the research being done as well as the types
of questions being asked, so everyone should feel welcome and embrace their
differences as strengths so we can solve
problems as effectively as possible.
«Yet, we learn from each other that the challenges we face are
human challenges and that the perception
of differences fuels so many
problems that we see in education and other sectors.»
Eidus is out to settle a few
problems with PupPod, not the least
of which is the
difference between dogs and their
humans at the end
of the day.
* There is too much conflicting evidence about climate change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate change is part
of a pattern that has been going on for millions
of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects
of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot
of very different theories about climate change
and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climate change
Then follows «mental health
of leftist activists», an extensive section on bias in social psychology and nmore general
problems being addressed by the Heterodox Academy effort, the sociology
of single - parenting, studies involving race / gender with IQ, personality, intellectual abilities and
differences in interest, genetics and
human evolution, enforced gender equality, scientific socialism, eugenics and the zero - population - growth movement, misguided environmentalism, and finally, a bit about climate change, rapidly followed by the «food police» and «diet wars», and then returning to a treatment
of the Climate Wars.
Applied to the
problem of large - scale legal document review and production, technology - assisted review enables a small number
of expert
human reviewers to train a computerized system to recognize the subtle
differences between responsive and non-responsive documents based on the review
of a small but representative sample
of the document collection.
• In - depth understanding
of human behavior and performance, motivation, learning styles, personality
differences, and psychological research methods • Rehab Documentation Company ReDoc Suite, Casamba Smart, and Lexrotech LxPediatric • Excellent active listening and verbal communication skills • Superior
problem solving abilities • Friendly, service - oriented personality • Good decision making skills