But in fact the author of that chapter was not concerned with the scientific
problem of the origin of species.
At first glance
the problem of origin in America seems a relatively simple one.
It is the central
problem of the origin of life, when aggregations of matter obeying only elementary physical laws first began to constrain individual molecules to a functional, collective behavior.
The two main frontiers of biological thought at present are (1) the living / non-living frontier (and included in this the tremendous
problem of the origin of the «primitive» cell) and (2) the mind / life frontier.
Here Jacques Monod (1971) would appear to agree with Popper in that he calls the problem of the human central nervous system «the second frontier,» comparing its difficulty with the «first frontier,»
the problem of the origin of life itself.
Thus, because the new Carter - Wills theory actually addresses real
problems of the origin of life that are concealed by the expediency of the RNA - world hypothesis, it is actually a far simpler account of how things probably happened just before life on Earth rose from the primordial soup.
Geoffrey Burbidge says that Hoyle «certainly solved
the problem of the origin of the elements.»
«Nothing I am saying should be interpreted as
the problem of the origin of life has been solved,» he says.
Our symposium is focused on
the problem of origin, mechanisms of action and evolutionary consequences of developmental constraints.
Not exact matches
Bayless, who specializes in later - stage private - equity placement, says, «
Origin Group allows larger companies to utilize the advantages
of being small and flexible in order to attack
problems created by their bigness.»
Its
origins are found in the industrial age, when the whole
of corporate might was thrown at finding new consumer
problems to solve.
«I believe that most
of the
problems in the entrepreneurial ecosystem have their
origin in the philosophy
of short - termism that infects our companies, our investors and our public markets,» he told the crowd at a recent event in Vancouver.
One
problem is that to import tariff - free under a trade deal, companies must be able to prove that the product meets the country -
of -
origin requirements
of the trade deal.
The country -
of -
origin problem goes away entirely, as companies would no longer need the protection
of free - trade deals to import tariff free.
Blockchain technology enables any issue with a product or process to easily be traced back to its
origin, making resolution
of the
problem a lot simpler.
However, my focus in this series is to intelligently discuss the real
problems of bitcoin's unknown
origins and the many
problems with the mass media narratives that have been built and disseminated to not only cover up these unknowns but also to falsely turn these unknowns into knowns.
As we showed in Part 1: Tesla's
Origin, the launch
of the Roadster was a public relations success, but it created all kinds
of problems internally.
As we showed in Part 1: Tesla's
Origin Story, the launch
of the Roadster was a public relations success, but it created all kinds
of problems internally.
I am
of Greek
origin and have a heavy beard, No pseudo folectilitis barbe or any other
problems.
The
problem with the
origin of the designer is a separate and independent issue, and you can never know, because you can not go outside this universe.
Evolution and the Fall is a collection
of essays from a multi-disciplinary and ecumenical group
of authors, which sets out to address «a set
of problems that arise from the encounter
of traditional biblical views
of human
origins with contemporary scientific theories» (p. xv)-- not, one might add, in general, to answer them.
relive the
origins of problems in the past and thereby finishing incomplete growth.)
Teachers
of Christian
origins today are faced with a
problem not unique to them — it is shared in some fashion by all teachers in the humanities — but nevertheless
of pressing urgency.
Among the biblical myths
of human
origin, two are particularly relevant to the
problems raised by globalization.
«Modern European philosophy, which had its
origins in Plato and Aristotle, after sixteen hundred years
of Christianity reformulated its
problems with increased attention to the importance
of the individual subject
of experience, conceived as an abiding entity with a transition
of experiences.»
While the cultural
problem has its
origins in blocked economic opportunities, it has taken on a self - perpetuating life
of its own.
None
of the numerous theories
of the chemical
origin of life are without
problems; all involve a lot
of chance.
Biologists as basically different in their philosophical and biological views as W. H. Thorpe and Jacques Monod agree that the
origin of life is a difficult, and thus far intractable and unsolved,
problem.
Capitalist — well, the
problem with you people who believe the «six days and a talking snake» theory
of terrestrial biological
origins is you throw out a ridiculous comment like «well, if men came from apes, why are there still apes» then, when challanged, claim the responder is being elitist.
The social
origin of the group and the composition
of its constituency pose two different
problems.
He said that «only a vital Christian faith, renewing its youth in its prophetic
origin, is capable
of dealing adequately with the moral and social
problems of our age.
Whether we are speaking
of pastoral psychology as a more or less loosely organized body
of principles which informed the daily work
of increasingly larger numbers
of ministers educated in the better seminaries, or whether we are talking about pastoral psychology in its more professional manifestations in the form
of institutional chaplaincies or church - related counseling centers, the sociological
origins of the movement tended to render it ineffective in relating to the specific
problems and life - styles
of the poor.
These questions get to the heart
of a philosophical
problem posed by Intelligent Design: It supposes that natural law, which is the basis for science, operates most
of the time but is periodically suspended, as in the Cambrian «explosion» and the
origin of life itself.
But not all the evil in the world is directly, or even indirectly, traceable to man, and that is why the
origin and presence
of evil in the world remain perennial
problems to baffle the mind
of man.
But Israel's thinkers refused to solve the
problem by the simple device
of postulating a divine
origin for the one and a material or diabolical for the other.
•
Problems with the
Origin of Biological Membranes in an Early Earth Environment • Man, Created in the Image
of God - How Man is Unique Among All Other Creatures on Earth
That kind
of circular argument even goes back to explanations
of the
origin of the universe — according to the big bang theory (which I don't really have a
problem with in the «big picture»).
The Origins
of Order contains rather detailed accounts
of computer simulations designed to illuminate a wide range
of problems of fundamental biological interest:
origin of life, development
of mammalian embryos, ecosystem dynamics, etc..
The
problem of honest and relevant interpretation
of texts is imbedded within the Bible itself and is not to be looked upon as an exercise post-biblical in
origin.
The civil libertarians have not recognized the
problem: by their lights, the liberties
of the creationists and others who hold other - than - naturalistic views
of human
origins are not being infringed upon because only scientific truth is arrayed against them.
But nothing threatens marriage and the family half as much as sin and unless we understand the
origins of sin and the mechanics
of it, then we'll never really get to the heart
of the
problem.
Christ the Lord is the cult symbol
of Christianity, but it would be an instance
of the genetic fallacy to concern oneself with
problems related to the historical
origin of that symbol, i.e. its relation to the historical Jesus.
Here is another view from two well - known (yet atheist) scientists: «Another major
problem for the chemical evolutionist is the
origin of the information that is found in living systems.
If now we recall that the Church, by virtue
of its
origin, is the heir
of the whole history
of God's dealings with His people, we are in a position to draw from the Bible itself a solution
of the
problem posed in this chapter.
But the
problem posed by the much longer history
of the earth was small compared with the furore which took place soon after the publication in 1859
of The
Origin of Species by Charles Darwin (1809 - 82).
As Whitehead's formulation
of his program becomes plausible, his basic philosophical
problem will become clear: Only a relativistic cosmology, in Whitehead's view, «brings the aesthetic, moral, and religious interests into relation with those concepts
of the world which have their
origin in natural science» (PR xii / vi).
However, I don't have a
problem with a professor, discussing the
origins of the universe, explaining that many religious beliefs have a belief in intelligent design, but that it is not within the scope
of a science class.
The
problem is in your conceptualization
of «god», as some ethereal, loosely definable metaphysical force responsible for our
origins.
This is why there must be freedom for the scholar to inquire into the historical
problem of Christian
origins, for example; why there must be freedom to think through once again what in the Christian tradition is «central» and what is «peripheral» (to use Professor Burnaby's words which I quoted in an earlier lecture); why there must be freedom to reconceive and restate what is then seen to be
of the essence
of the faith.
From this standpoint there is no
problem as to the
origin of life.