The problem with religious people that you can not use logic.
Your religion is yours alone and therin lies the # 1
problem with some religious people — thay acannot accept that their religion is theirs and does not apply to other people.
I don't know all that much about God, but I know this is the root of
the problem with religious people.
I thought the whole
problem with religious people was that they somehow seem to like to force their religion onto others.
That is one of the biggest
problems with religious people... the inability to separate belief from knowledge.
i would have
no problems with any religious person if they didn't believe in a religion or magical beings
Not exact matches
You're just not grounded in reality but thats the
problem with most
religious people.
Mr. Hawking wins easy battles against uneducated (in science)
religious persons, but taking his statement on perspective, He is based on assumptions
with serious underlying
problems, basically everything from mathematics, to the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and relativity, and the lack of proof and evidence for string theories, he is launching a very aggressive statement, probably his last effort on life to counter the anthropomorphic ideas of God, and this is very common in all scientists.
I have no
problem with any other religion (I'm not
religious myself) because they, on a whole, promote positive actions amongst their
people.
Funny, you don't seem to have a
problem with all of the
religious people doing the very same thing all over this country.
That is the biggest
problem with you f»n
religious people, you think everything is made to offend you.
I have a real
problem with people believing in man - made
religious rules.
When a patient's
problems are related to
religious or moral conflict, the staff clergyman would be the most likely
person for the patient to see because of his authority in this area and because he may be perceived by the patient to be the most appropriate
person to deal
with these
problems.
For years I struggled
with doubts about my faith, and through the emerging church movement, I found
people who were asking the very same questions - about
religious pluralism, the
Problem of Evil, inerrancy, the notion of absolute truth, etc..
I don't have a
problem with the general idea that there is much we don't know about the universe and reality, the
problem is when
people... «spiritual» or «
religious»....
The main
problem I've seen
with people accepting evolution (aside from plain old
religious grounds) is a lack of concept of the vast amounts of time over which these things happened.
I think it is okay to be spiritual but not
religious, and that
people shouldn't have a
problem with people who are like this.
People who have problems rationalizing something like that are often people that live in the world of the unattainable «moral» dissonance that comes with the psychology of the modern religious p
People who have
problems rationalizing something like that are often
people that live in the world of the unattainable «moral» dissonance that comes with the psychology of the modern religious p
people that live in the world of the unattainable «moral» dissonance that comes
with the psychology of the modern
religious person.
To fill the gap left by a weakened church,
people are not only experimenting
with both new and ancient forms of the spiritual and psychic life; they are searching for
religious books that deal
with the complex
problems of society in personal, direct and simple ways.
To me, the biggest
problem with the
religious isn't that they believe in something I happen to not, it's that they are brought up to believe that believing in god is obligatory and that they are never given a choice as children... it's «believe, or you're a bad
person».
The acknowledge that it may not have a positive response from
religious people, but they aren't concerned because ANYTHING atheists do, some
religious people will have a
problem with it.
Religion is and should be a very personal thing, the
problem I have
with religious people is that many seek to impose their system of belief on everyone around them.
Thats the
problem with plenty of
religious ppl, they go to a building on Sundays
with well dressed
ppl and think they are magically moral for the rest of the week.
The biggest
problem with religious fundamentalism is the fact that
people who promote it want their followers to be fervent in their beliefs.
But I suppose it has to be dealt
with in this consultation from the point of view of its relevance and relation to the
problems raised by the threat of
Religious Communalism to the Secular Democratic character of Indian polity and the democratic struggle of the
people for an egalitarian community.
The
problem with this formulation is that it conflates, or anyhow fails to distinguish between, the
religious character of a
person and that of a society.
I do not have a
problem with atheists, there are many good atheists and many bad just as there are
religious people - some of which I do not like.
They don't understand that many
religious people, including the Pope, have no
problem whatsoever
with a 14 billion year old universe full of life evolved on a million planets.
Now I answer
with: «Not
religious, just spiritual...» Religion is a way for
people to dump their sad feelings and fosters a form of belief that our
problems are greater than ourselves and that we are incapable of fixing them.
The use of your
religious criteria is the central
problem with all organized religions, ESPECIALLY evangelical fundamentalist — either Christian, Muslim, or Scientology (all banes to any society)-- where some allegedly «religiously educated and therefore holy»
person gets to command the suggestible faithful, usually to the direct benefit of the alleged «religiously educated»
person.
So to those
people that have a
problem with the politics of the «
religious right», I'm
with you, but don't confuse things and make that out to be a
problem with Christ, because they're not the same thing...
The
problem that exists that I agree
with in the columnist is not the «Spiritual, not
religious» mentality, it is the FACT THAT
PEOPLE SCREAM AND THROW OUT HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL OPINIONS but yet have never read anything and do not have an accurate understanding of the topic they are discussing.
That characteristic of your god is simply a reflection of the fear that the bronze age goat herders had 2000 years ago: they understood that if
people were encouraged to use their brains, they would quickly identify the many, many
problems with religious doctrine.
When a recovering alcoholic comes to him for help
with his
religious problems or
with the «spiritual angle» in AA, he has an opportunity to contribute to the creativity of that
person's new way of life.
The
problem for the young ministers, first of all, was to establish some kind of communication
with East Harlem, to overcome the cultural barriers and get to know
people at the level of our common humanity where the genuine
religious issues arise.
One of the serious
problems in the world today is
religious communalism, that is,
people's preoccupation
with the interests of their own
religious or ethnic group.
That is the
problem with religious freaks, as they go looking for conformation of their religion from
people who DON «T believe.
Please leave
religious people alone and get on
with solving all the worlds
problems we know you are so rationally equipped to do.
To get around this
problem with religious TV viewers, the Annenberg researchers went to several previous months of Arbitron television viewers «diaries, looked up the actual programs watched by day, hour and channel in the TV Guide, and thereby identified «confirmed viewing» — in other words, what
people really watched.
I have no
problem with companies run according to
religious beliefs as long as they don't discriminate against anyone and don't contribute millions of dollars to causes specifically desigened to deny rights to any group of
people.
I have no
problem with religious folks but you must understand that from a scientist point of view, we cant trust
religious people for the simple fact that they are anti-science via their own beliefs.
He said: «But I think I can say this, when we heard
with my collaborators about the killings of the
religious minorities, the
problem at that moment in Kurdistan was that they could not receive so many
people.
I don't think
people have
problems with business owners being
religious.
Two types of contemporary Christian lay -
people and
religious are, along
with theologians, concerned
with problems arising out of today's encounter among religions.
«The
problem with writing about religion is that you run the risk of offending sincerely
religious people, and then they come after you
with machetes.»
I have no
problem with people taking advantage of their
religious freedom in this country, but I have just as much of a right not to have your
religious values imposed on me!!!
Funny how you
religious types never have a
problem with the
people who invent bombs, but as soon as us biologists start talking about evolution, then we've crossed a line.
I think the biggest
problem with a certain breed of
religious ppl... is that they forget that different cultures have different customs.
Very few
people (athiest, agnostic or
religious) have
problems with what Jesus said.
The
problem with most
religious people is that they feel theirs is the «ONE, true religion»... Catholics, Muslims, Jewish, Protestant, etc..