Welby said religious scriptures have «been twisted and misused» to justify violence, but it's up to faith leaders to teach against religious violence and tackle
problems with ideology.
There are two more
problems with ideology in politics, and here I take the example of Barack Obama.
Not exact matches
From the «conservative»
ideology, the «
problem» is that the Central State, in cahoots
with public unions and Corporate Overlords, grabs an ever - larger share of the national income to redistribute to reward its cronies and favorites.
After drawing out how the encyclical applies this to various social, economic and ecological issues he highlighted, concerning «the
problem of technology», that «this is the first time an encyclical deals
with the subject in such an organic manner -LSB-...] The exclusively technical mentality [and
ideology] in fact, reduces all to pure doing... [True human development] requires a new perspective upon man that only the God who is truth and love can provide.»
The truth is — one of the
problems with Communism is that it was a dogmatic
ideology, which was all too similar to religion.
Only a zealot blinded by the
ideology of population control would assert that the
problem with Somalia and Haiti is that there are too many Somalians and Haitians.
Beyond this, Gutiérrez's observation, along
with converging insights of other liberation theologians, has led me to realize that the
ideology involved in the traditional formulations of faith's claims is as much a
problem as the mythology they involve in establishing their credibility to contemporary men and women.
So the natural philosopher who aims for comprehensive explanations that do justice both to science and to ordinary experience is obliged to wrestle
with the
problem of the «goodness,» or otherwise, of predominant mythologies, especially those that underpin the scientistic
ideology.
As an example, families
with the same
ideology and race, even without religion, still have
problems getting along...
Our age just wants to manage the business cycle
with monetary policy, regulate efficiently, institute a multicultural
ideology that harmonizes potentially antagonistic groups, and provide effective therapy for personal
problems.
«That is the
problem with some of you», some of you folks get your panties in a bunch because fans don't conform to your
ideology of who we should draft.
For the Tories, the
problem with the scheme they inherited was its emphasis on the integration of Muslims into British society rather than delegitimising the toxic
ideologies behind terrorist acts.
However, the real
problem for Cuomo when it comes to the WFP isn't only the investigation, it's also the party's liberal
ideology, which does not mesh
with his fiscally conservative platform.
Focusing on a perceived national
problem (and let's not forget, the nation is a evocative idea, people will wilfully die for their country) of disordered drinking allows the government to enforce regulation without appearing at odds
with their underlying political
ideology.
Part of the
problem, some local observers said, is that the mayor's agenda doesn't quite mesh
with the
ideology of most Staten Islanders.
«I ask you today to believe again we can solve our
problems with ideas not
ideology.»
This view may be influenced by free market
ideology which is put forward as a silver bullet for a few of society's
problems and sceptics have apparently come put
with the term market fundamentalism to qualify the pseudo-religious views of some of its proponents.
«The
problem with this is that it assumes people develop personalities and at a certain point, choose an
ideology to match their personality.
Ideologies are challenged and debated as each of these characters come face to face
with opposing beliefs in order to escape the
problems that have befallen them from so categorically classifying their worldviews.
In «School Vouchers, Pro and Con» (Commentary, July 10, 1996), advocate Jerome J. Hanus and opponent Peter W. Cookson Jr. overlook what should be the most obvious
problems with voucher systems, all wholly independent of religion and
ideology.
But there are two serious
problems for GOP administrations
with this
ideology - free, «agenda - by - items» approach to education.
In the mean time, the killing goes on and leaves you
with the knowledge that an
ideology of «nice» stands firmly in the way of resolving the
problem.
This straight forward article talks about the
problem with the (unfortunately) prevailing dog training
ideology that is being force fed to the American public, and that sadly results in the deaths of millions of dogs every year.
Faced
with a
problem they cant solve within their
ideology, Right - wingers seem instead to prefer denial.
(btw - the main
problem with the students attitude may not be incompetence but simply the fact that they got so used to trust blindly what tv or experts tell them (especially when they appear in groups) and that they can not imagine that there may be something wrong though even current scandals (VW - Diesel) or older failures (ozon - cfc / ice age scare) or even the fact that thousands of scientists were more than willing to change their
ideology and citizenship (+ certain scientific believes) as it happened
with «operation paperclip.
When the policy solution emphasized a tax on carbon emissions or some other form of government regulation, which is generally opposed by Republican
ideology, only 22 percent of Republicans said they believed the temperatures would rise at least as much as indicated by the scientific statement they read.But when the proposed policy solution emphasized the free market, such as
with innovative green technology, 55 percent of Republicans agreed
with the scientific statement.For Democrats, the same experiment recorded no difference in their belief, regardless of the proposed solution to climate change.As study authors Troy Campbell and Aaron Kay wrote in the introduction to their paper about this study, this shows «not necessarily an aversion to the
problem, per se, but an aversion to the solutions associated
with the
problem.»
Some might still sense no
problem with such an expertisation of politics, and may even prefer it to what appears to be the arbitrary landscape of politics and
ideology.
As long as people get away
with outrageous propositions of the kind that «climate change is a top important
problem the mankind is obliged to wrestle
with», the common understanding of justice will have a lower priority than the
ideology which is why illegal and unethical behavior will continue.
Those who point out the
problems of making arguments for policy on the back of PR stunts and junk science are labelled as «sceptics» or «deniers», motivated by profit, «
ideology» or simple bad - mindedness rather than the desire for a sensible debate about our relationship
with the natural environment and concern about development.
Another person
with severe reading comprehension
problems who is completely unable to grasp the difference between increasing the death rate and decreasing the birth rate as methods for reducing the population and who is so blinded by whatever
ideology under the influence of which he happens to be that he is more than ready to deny existence of the most basic laws of physics and principles of ecology.
And they are ongoing victims of their politically expedient choices to deny the scientific basis for real global
problems their
ideology lacks the capacity to cope
with, rather than face those inadequacies.
MY
problem with the idea that clouds provide a strong net negative feedback isn't that it «conflicts
with my
ideology» somehow, but that it does not explain the paleoclimate.
Since the Law Society has already voted to extend its EDI recommendations to «other equality - seeking groups» without bothering
with the pretense of requiring evidence of discrimination, or without even defining those groups, we might be forgiven for thinking that we are dealing more
with ideology than
with the solving of actual
problems.
There is not even a suggestion that if, as a demographic group, children of divorce are having more
problems — assuming they are — it's more likely to be because of the rise in popularity of the ridiculous, schizophrenic, and unstable co-parenting
ideology, which in turn is increasing the absence of mothers from their children's lives, as well as increasing stressful, wasteful, and expensive years of «burgeoning custody litigation,» including the endless talkety talk - talk meddling
with families by those who make their money doing «therapeutic jurisprudence.»