Sentences with phrase «problems in defense»

The plan was carefully constructed so as not to undermine the teacher performance evaluation system, though it does call for low scoring teachers to be able to use implementation problems in their defense as they fight for their jobs.

With both teams playing a similar brand of football and having similar problems in defense, they could create plenty of chances.

We need to spend a lot and look for the future and fix our problems in the defense.

The man is not stupid to know that we have problems in defense that he has to sort out.

Arsenal has had a big problem in defense since FOREVER, even though BFG and Kos did well for most of last season.

When you score 3 but still lose, it's a problem in defense.

Manchester City and Guardiola suffered from the quality - over-quantity problem in defense last season, but now, with an 18 - point lead on second - place Manchester United, they have laid the blueprint for devising a system that maximizes attacking verve and defensive robustness.

Not exact matches

Down the line, however, the Steelers could be facing major problems on defense, particularly if there are this many breakdowns in communication and overall skill in the secondary.

With ISIS continuing to fight, Russia and China throwing their weight around, and budget shortfalls becoming bigger and bigger problems, the Department of Defense will definitely need strong leadership in the form of a commander - in - chief and his political appointees in the months immediately following the inauguration next year.

When we do this, we are likely to find that the real problem with missile strikes in defense of international norms is not that they are illegal.

But in my opinion, the greatest problem is that truth is not a valid defense!

This is one of the problems that often hinders dialogue with radical atheists (not sure you are one, but you did answer a question I posed to people who believe God is a fantasy)-- rather than offer a defense they will attack in such a way as to obfuscate the purpose of the original discussion.

In his December 10, 2009, Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, President Barack Obama offered a vigorous defense of the just war tradition in response to problems of evil and injustice in the worlIn his December 10, 2009, Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, President Barack Obama offered a vigorous defense of the just war tradition in response to problems of evil and injustice in the worlin response to problems of evil and injustice in the worlin the world.

Mascall acknowledges the limitations of his account of analogy, but the problem seems to be even more acute than he recognizes in his defense.

It must be said in their defense that often the kind of problem being investigated could be well served by assuming an imagery of mechanism.

While defense contractors say that there is no moral or religious dilemma for their employees, church leaders say that there is a problem, but one that can be solved by refusing to participate in the development or production of nuclear weapons and technology.

The strategy of the academy and of the Department of Defense, revealed in an investigation led by Lieutenant General Roger Brady, himself an evangelical Christian, has been to respond to instances of alleged intolerance rather than to any systemic problem.

(See the Problem of Evil in Process Theism and Classical Free - Will Theism by William Hasker; Traditional Free Will Theodicy and Process Theodicy: Hasker's Claim for Parity; «Bitten to Death by Ducks»: A Reply to Griffin; On Hasker's Defense of his Parity Claim by David Ray Griffin (see www.religion-online.org.)

A Modest Defense of Gossip, Rudeness, and Other Bad Habits by Emrys Westacott Princeton, 304 pages, $ 26.95 In The Virtues of Our Vices, Emrys Westacott eschews academic theorizing about hypothetical life - and - death moral dilemmas (such as the «trolley problem»)....

In a thoughtful assessment of Berlin's achievement («A Dissent on Isaiah Berlin,» Commentary, February 1999), Norman Podhoretz has argued that, despite its important contribution in its time, Berlin's essay is at bottom intellectually unsatisfying: It does not propose a principled, but only a pragmatic, defense of pluralism, and it fails to grapple satisfactorily with a problem that Berlin notes but never seriously addresses — the problem of moral relativisIn a thoughtful assessment of Berlin's achievement («A Dissent on Isaiah Berlin,» Commentary, February 1999), Norman Podhoretz has argued that, despite its important contribution in its time, Berlin's essay is at bottom intellectually unsatisfying: It does not propose a principled, but only a pragmatic, defense of pluralism, and it fails to grapple satisfactorily with a problem that Berlin notes but never seriously addresses — the problem of moral relativisin its time, Berlin's essay is at bottom intellectually unsatisfying: It does not propose a principled, but only a pragmatic, defense of pluralism, and it fails to grapple satisfactorily with a problem that Berlin notes but never seriously addresses — the problem of moral relativism.

The agency had issued the blanket ban as a way to get around the First Amendment problems that would have arisen had it issued a specific ban against an ad that pro-Israel activist Pamela Geller wanted to post on buses and in subway stations in the spring of 2015: the prize - winning caricature of the prophet Muhammad in a «Draw Muhammad» contest that Geller's American Freedom Defense Initiative had earlier sponsored in Dallas.

This has been an especially difficult problem for the traditional free will defense, because that defense is oriented around the idea that human suffering can be justified in terms of God's «soul - making» purpose of producing moral and spiritual virtues.

In defense of the rice ones from Trader Joe's (AKA Food for Life brand at any other store)-- yes, they break and yes, they do not behave like a regular tortilla and are frustrating but WOW do they make the best quesadillas and if you have a problem with corn, try cutting them up into chips and frying them up in an inch of olive oil in a 4 quart pot on the stove — the BEST tortilla chips that stay crispy and do not turn stale if you put them in a plastic zippered bag for up to a few (yes few) weekIn defense of the rice ones from Trader Joe's (AKA Food for Life brand at any other store)-- yes, they break and yes, they do not behave like a regular tortilla and are frustrating but WOW do they make the best quesadillas and if you have a problem with corn, try cutting them up into chips and frying them up in an inch of olive oil in a 4 quart pot on the stove — the BEST tortilla chips that stay crispy and do not turn stale if you put them in a plastic zippered bag for up to a few (yes few) weekin an inch of olive oil in a 4 quart pot on the stove — the BEST tortilla chips that stay crispy and do not turn stale if you put them in a plastic zippered bag for up to a few (yes few) weekin a 4 quart pot on the stove — the BEST tortilla chips that stay crispy and do not turn stale if you put them in a plastic zippered bag for up to a few (yes few) weekin a plastic zippered bag for up to a few (yes few) weeks.

Those three players might have been a part of the problem, but they weren't the reason the White Sox were so disappointing, Crumbling defense, especially in the infield, combined with hundreds and hundreds of at - bats given to low - upside young players, hamstrung the White Sox far more than the offseason mini-spending spree helped.

No way do you invest $ 14.5 million plus a first round pick in the same offensive position on a team with frightening problems on defense.

We got carzola and ozil when we lost any one of them we were sluggish so for me viraty should do the trick for me as he is good taking the ball from out of defense but also has good range of passing abomayang for a striker for sure but the defense needs a tall specialist a header of the ball as we conceded quite few headers we need to fix 2 problems at the very least next season one being lack of scoring and the other being the lack of defense in set pieces

Look at how the players have been changing over the years in our defense from squillaci and djorou to vermaelin koscielny mustafi etc but the problems still persist.

Who ever is on form plays B2B — Ramsey and Wilshire again a pretty good combo CDM — We need one + Coq (Schneiderlin, Kongdobia, Wanyama) Defense: I do nt rate BFG would prefer a faster CD in his place but we have bigger problems GK — Ospina is actually a good GK, Cech would be better

In my opinion the Nuggets main problem besides defense has been a lack of getting good shots when they need one.

Its fine your entitled to your opinion, but its asinine, no the defense wasnt looking for a turn over, they were not in position to make a play to get a turn over... The entire problem with the offense in the playoffs stems from the offensive line playing terrible + injuries.

This week it could be that while one end of the Premiership table is decided, at least West ham and Sheffield United are keeping things interesting, that we know exactly what Jose Mourinho will say if Liverpool beat them in the Champions League but we're dying to hear what he'll say upon losing his first Premier League title, that Tottenham have the most shockingly organised defense, that maybe Chris Coleman really wasn't the problem at Fulham, that Mark Hughes and Roy Keane will make for a fantastic battle of the Ferguson successors next season, or that we're excited to see whether Fat Sam can do it again.

Unfortunately, our own defense is caused as many problems as the others because he loses the ball in poor areas just as often as the risks pay off on the other end.

So instead of adjusting his system in order to best maximize his assets, he blows $ 5mil in cap space trading away Ricky for a lateral move in Teague because a scoring PG fits his system better (despite the fact that defense was obviously this team's problem).

Wenger should properly invest in the problem areas such as striking and defense instead of add yet more midfielders we do nt need.

any team in the league knows that if there is strong forward against arsenal then the defense cracks — caroll, drogba, costa etc... the same problem for 5 or more years..

Detroit has defensive problems, while New York, whose coach, Boom Boom Geoffrion, is «in seclusion» recuperating from a stomach attack, lacks muscle up front and stability on defense.

He refused to solve the main problem we had in defense and DM and still refuse to rotate the squad He can blame the players, but what about himself?

Wengers should have just added a very good DM and another quicker defender to treat those kind of problems but eish he is too stubborn to drop his new captain or Flamini and he had to change the formation to make sure the midfield players defend and attack in numbers with one DM to always protect the defense but this is not happening and Wenger will not change that until maybe 2 or 3 years because he is not under any pressure to do well after all!

Fair enough, he placed Walcott because Giroud was not available, but didn't he put Chamberlain also in the lineup... to form a pacy lineup to cause problems to Olympiakos defense??

arsenal have scored 37 goals after 24 matches, the top 3 teams all score 44 or above... arsenal give away only 21 goals, top 3 give away average of 25, our problem is not mert, flamini... all the players we seem to hate, our defense is number 3 in the league, our problem is we can not score

Now, what are the problems that we see in the team today, defense, mid field and attack that we have not identified 6 - 7 years ago?

wow are we sterile up top, goals need to come from defense again, ozil & cech were great, mert once again taking the brunt of bad comments meanwhile a clean sheet and did nothing wrong, open goal that was saved was kos out of position and monreal caught up the pitch too high, giroud has great ball skills, issue is his position on the pitch, watched the match again focused on giroud, he tends to camp behind the defender from the ball, this only works when you have the quickness to break, he does nt, I have screen shots where ozil is 25 yrds farther up the pitch then giroud, thisis the problem, he is rendered useless unless ozil holds up, and thats not ozils strength, thus very few sog's from giroud on the run, when giroud gets lucky w space in front of the defender, he is lethal, but needs to get into that space,

The greatest goalkeepers command their defense and make very little number of saves per game, if a goalkeeper has to rely on his own reflexes rather than use the defenders in front of him as human shields, then there is a big problem!

In the midfield, connecting defense to attack continues to be a problem until the change to a back three and the evolution of the Xhaka / Ramsey pivot.

I believe its his naivety in defense that's the source of all problems.

So what you want us to say is, okay, Liverpool let in 3 goals against Watford so there's no problem with our defense right?

However, their problem even during the Klopp days was in defense.

For me, we have acute problems not just in finishing, but in midfield and defense as well.

In my view, Arsenal does not have a defense problem.

And Giroud's rating is too generous, he did not cause big problems in the opponents» defense area.