Not exact matches
Finally, beyond the United Kingdom's withdrawal, the post will move on to consider whether the idea of a joint
national and European court could provide a solution to the
problems that arise from the unique composite nature of the EU
legal order.
Mencap aims to improve access to social care and is therefore attempting to i) gather powerful data in
order to influence local and
national decision makers; ii) provide early advice with the help of solicitors and barristers working pro bono; and iii) improve
legal education by training care managers to spot
legal problems and developing a chat bot — an «automated
legal brain» which is interactive and can provide information and rights and redress.
That noted, to the extent that Broadcom's acquisition was a
national security
problem because of how future Qualcomm investment would be curtailed, the U.S. is lucky that Broadcom happened to be a foreign company — that is precisely why CFIUS's review and President Trump's
order were even
legal.
a) Sounds to me like the same strategy as was used by the «Sovereignty - Association» crew at the Constitutional level — asking for special exemptions AND $ $ compensation - for - services - provided - locally, expecting / demanding «special status» within the
national organization to recognize inherent cultural / language differences,
legal uniqueness (rooted in BNA & pre-Confed special - arrangements) blah blah blah - while attempting to hold the whole organization hostage / in doubt, while angling for a better deal — settled in desperation / exasperation in
order to make the
problem «go away».