[8] I have discussed this issue in more detail in Peter A. Gall, «
Problems with a Faith Based Approach to Judicial Review» in Judicial Deference to Administrative Tribunals in Canada: Its History and Future (Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2014)[Gall, «Faith Based»] at 219 - 223.
The other thing is that I have a real
problem with faith in the trinity.
Of that number, 90 % — 1.8 billion — belong to sects whose official p [osition is that there is
no problem with a faith in the Christian version of a god, and an understanding that evolution is a fact.
Of that number, 90 % — 1.8 billion — belong to sects whose position is that there is
no problem with a faith in the Christian version of a god and an understanding that evolution is a fact.
That is
the problem with faith.
I don't have
a problem with any faith's description on Heaven, either; it's what they are willing to do in His name to get there that I have a problem with.
Of that number, 1.8 billion (90 %) belong to sects whose position is that there is
no problem with a faith in your version of a god, and an understanding that evolution is a fact.
I believe that we should all have tolerance for each other's faith or faithlessness; the ONLY time I have a real
problem with faith is when it interferes with the operation of government and social programs, including women's reproduction rights and gay rights issues.
I am also an atheist and I have
no problem with faith, religion, or spirituality.
I have
no problem with FAITH... with the belief in something greater than yourself and the search for it.
When you pray and nothing happens, that's
a problem with your faith.
the problem with faith is no matter how little of evidence there is for god there is no doubt that hes there...
Not exact matches
We are also pleased to see that the CSA, IIROC and MFDA may view refusals or low ball offers as an indication of
problems with a registered firm's complaint handling practices including their obligation to deal fairly, honestly and in good
faith with clients, act within the applicable standard of care, or have implemented and maintained effective complaint handling procedures.
What I have a
problem with is a leader who preaches his
faith to me, and expects me to have similar beliefs as him, and follow the rules of his religion.
I don't have a
problem with a leader who has
faith.
I will have to live my whole life surrounded by a world filled
with mental midgets who have fooled themselves that
faith and belief in deities is the answer instead of using their minds to work out
problems, study science and figure out how we leave this planet when it becomes inhabitable in 4 billion years.
I am happy that the writer had the choices that she did... She is also free to decide whether or not she is a Catholic... She however, took an available medication for a health
problem... most Catholic facilities recognize such health
problems and allow for that treatment... I am completly puzzled, though, that she would not want other Catholics to be able to choose differently than she did... for those people who wish to use contraceptive services and medication, options are open to them... I am not Catholic, did not grow up in a
faith based family, and don't know whether a God exists or not... However, to leave a relgious group
with no option but to contradict its own tenets is an attempt by those who don't believe in those tenents to mock them, certainly, but more to erode them... this seems the aim of many and when those folks operate from inside the government... that intrusion is an overreach of the govenrment...
They are increasingly being forced to struggle, however,
with problems on the other side — the side of their relation to Christian
faith and the institutional Church.
We can hold deep and fundamental differences
with people of other
faiths, yet share mutual concerns, work together and overcome common
problems.
It's all well and good, and I have no
problem with any President being a person of
faith.
Not quite tallulah, all the other gods are man invented or possibly demonic.Every other idol god either mimics God and or requires a series of works to gain their favor.They are created by men to appease the inner knowledge of God, but all fall short of the creator God.You can not work your way into Gods good graces, you can only be saved by
faith through grace.God alone has resolved the sin
problem we all suffer from, in the selfless sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross.It is by accepting Jesus» redemption for us that allows us to be reconciled
with God.God bless
There was no
problem with separation of church and state when GWB opened the floodgate for federal funding of
faith based NPs.
rea · son — noun / ˈrēzən / a.Think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic — humans do not reason entirely from facts b.Find an answer to a
problem by considering various possible solutions c.Persuade (someone)
with rational argument — I tried to reason
with her, but without success» I accept nothing on
faith» can you prove we evolved from primates or that life started by random chance?
Many Pollsters are but Moneygrubbers of a Hierarchy that Manifests the Futility of Numbered
Faith and is a
Problem with a Country's Political Arenas.
Being able to differentiate a person's
faith from what is scientifically true and provable is not something that many are capable of, but I would see no
problem with.
So I guess you have no
problem with people of
faith disrespecting your beliefs?
I'm not sure why he has such a
problem with others having
faith, worse case scenario is that they spent time praying to someone that doesn't exist and everyone will end up being worm food.
But a lack of
faith is not a new
problem; throughout the Bible we see those that have difficulty
with faith, even when God's miracles are visible.
«I wouldn't have a
problem with a child being fostered by someone who comes from a different
faith but is sensitive to and responds to that child, who communicates
with them, who shows their face to that child as well.
As anyone familiar
with my own work will expect, I have many serious reservations about this book, the most inclusive being that I do not think the author helps either the nonbeliever or the believer to understand the
problem of
faith and New Testament criticism.
Not to speak for HAA and also
with respect, it's not «God» in government that scares folks, it's the people who believe they know what «He» wants based on their preferred holy books and see no
problem in trying to advance their sectarian
faith positions utilizing government powers.
I quite agree
with Caso that a big
problem currently has been the eroding of
faith on the part of creditors due to poor business practices.
The
FAITH Movement has never shied away from recognising
problems: a look through the back editions of this magazine reveals plenty of blunt talk about challenges within the Church and in Western society, occasionally
with a note of gloomy relish.
It's not just Atheists and Agnostics who paint
faith with a broad brush; it's all too common of a
problem within Christianity itself.
Both intelligence and persistence are required to cope
with these
problems, and the use of the best types of secular knowledge in a Christian framework, as in the growing convergence of Christian
faith with psychotherapy in pastoral counseling.
While thinkers like Sir Sayyid and Iqbal were dealing
with the
problem posed by the impact of the West, a religious conflict was in progress because of the activities of the Christian missionaries and militant Hindu movements like the Arya Samaj, both of them trying to win Muslims to their own
faith.
Each denomination was fully independent but agreed to surrender certain prerogatives
with regard to general
problems such as defense of the
faith, spread of the gospel, and moral reform.
But the question of consistency
with our Christian
faith will lead us to confront the darker areas of life as we deal
with the
problem of suffering.
Perhaps if you do not bring in pain and honesty, if you do not insist that your
faith face pain squarely and honestly, that it be consistent
with what your mind reasons and your heart feels and your eyes see, then perhaps
faith is no
problem for you.
(I am aware of the irony of this statement coming from a regular contributor to this blog) The great
problem with religious
faith is that any proposition predicated on dogmatic acceptance of unprovable supernatural postulates can and will be manipulated by the unscrupulous for their own gain.
Instead, the next few months and years will be filled
with hard work, decision making,
problem solving, time commitments, financial commitments,
faith commitments, vulnerability, uncertainty, and all the messy and beautiful things that go along
with spending a lot of time
with people.
Bibliolatry became a
problem when, confusing traditionalism
with Tradition, the Protestant Reformers claimed the Bible as the ONLY binding authority for
faith and morals:
It is worth pointing out in response that anyone who thinks Christians have never grappled
with the
problem of evil can never have noticed that the crucifix is the central symbol of Christian
faith.
There are also signs of a new dawn, as people of
faith are renewed in their spiritual life and engage more actively
with the
problems and suffering of the world.
This is a serious
problem, and if Christian
faith is to recover its self - assurance it must be grappled
with.
For years I struggled
with doubts about my
faith, and through the emerging church movement, I found people who were asking the very same questions - about religious pluralism, the
Problem of Evil, inerrancy, the notion of absolute truth, etc..
This may mean helping a patient deal
with the implications of his
faith for his
problems, raising the issue
with the staff regarding the effect of the religious dimension of a patient's life on his present behavior, or in helping the staff to deal
with their own religious feelings or understanding.
Technology can help in dealing
with this, but the economists»
faith that it can solve such
problems is misplaced.
This is the old
faith, just as the last
problems of our life remain the old ones: that we should become loving and unselfish, that we should bear the darknesses of existence, that we should finally come to terms
with death, that we should do our duty also when we can expect no earthly reward, that we should follow our crucified Lord and Saviour.
If one isn't willing to grant as much validity to another
faith as they do their own, however they can appreciate, learn from, and respect that
faith... is there a
problem with that?