Not exact matches
California law expressly requires
employers to reimburse employees for business expenses and several suits
proceeding against Uber are based on that state law.
(a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an
employer to discriminate
against any of his employees or applicants for employment, for an employment agency to discriminate
against any individual, or for a labor organization to discriminate
against any member thereof or applicant for membership, because he has opposed, any practice made an unlawful employment practice by this title, or because he has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation,
proceeding, or hearing under this title.
(D) It shall be unlawful for an
employer to discriminate
against any of his employees or applicants for employment, for an employment agency to discriminate
against any individual, or for a labor organization to discriminate
against any member thereof or applicant for membership, because such individual, member or applicant for membership has opposed any practice made unlawful by this section, or because such individual, member or applicant for membership has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation,
proceeding, or litigation under this Act.
One of our Employment Attorneys will review your claims
against your
employer and tell you the best method to
proceed.
The Employment Standards Code s. 125 also prohibits
employers from discriminating
against employees who assert their rights under the Act, make a complaint under the Act, or give evidence in any hearing of
proceeding under the Act.
Before incorporating a non-competition provision into an employee's contract of employment or reminding a departing employee that a non-competition provision precludes the employee from competing and will be enforced
against him or her,
employers should carefully consider the value of
proceeding in such a fashion and all of the ramifications.
Intent on taking action
against her former
employer, a woman called the Ministry for information and was encouraged to
proceed.
The takeaway for employees is to understand their legal claim
against their former
employers and
proceed accordingly.
First, if the employee does not make reasonable efforts to obtain new employment, then the
employer may be able to use that fact
against them if the matter should
proceed to litigation.
Throughout the
proceeding, the
employer requested that an adverse inference be drawn
against the complainant for his failure to call his doctor or any attending physician to establish a disability.
Indiana Court Allows Son's Suit
Against Father for Auto Accident Injuries to
Proceed, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, July 19, 2012 Liability of Drivers and Their
Employers in Distracted Driving Accidents, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, July 13, 2012 Photo credit: «bridge over indiana 3» by zups on stock.xchng.