(5) Nothing in this section limits the authority of a court to stay or dismiss
a proceeding as an abuse of process or on any other ground.
Not exact matches
I have the greatest sympathy for those who suffered
as a result of
abuse, but legally and in the media, we should
proceed with caution here.
«EFCC (will be) claiming to have received a tip - off from a whistle - blower in your state alerting the agency of a «large huge» amount of money of different currencies in the said apartment belonging to you, Senator Ike Ekweremadu, the Deputy Senate President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, a
proceed of which is likely to be (considered
as) illegally obtained and acquired, which constitute
abuse of office and corruption.»
• Applicants who are required to establish rehabilitation under Rule 3 - 13 «so
as to ascertain whether they displayed any malice or ill feeling towards those who were compelled to bring about the
proceeding leading to the need to establish rehabilitation;» • Applicants with a history of substance
abuse / dependence «so
as to ascertain whether they discussed or posted photographs of any recent substance
abuse;» • Applicants with «significant candor concerns» including not telling the truth on employment applications or resumes; • Applicants with a history of unlicensed practice of law (UPL) allegations; • Applicants who have worked
as a certified legal intern, reported self - employment in a legal field, or reported employment
as an attorney pending admission «to ensure that these applicants are not holding themselves out
as attorneys;» • Applicants who have positively responded to Item 27 of the bar application disclosing «involvement in an organization advocating the overthrow of a government in the United States to find out if they are still involved in any related activities.»
An order for protection or OFP is an order that a court enters
as a result of a court
proceeding where the court finds that the «respondent» has committed acts of domestic
abuse.
RT @crimlacy: #ONCA Crown decision to
proceed by Indictment vs. Summarily not open to challenge
as abuse of process: https://t.co/ewMiTLbN…
As a result the trial record in this proceeding is incomplete and unbalanced on crucial issues including: (1) the widespread suicidal ideation initially experienced by persons with disabilities responding to their disabilities; [8](2) relevant exploitation and abuse to which people with disabilities and the elderly are subjected; [9](3) prejudice faced by persons with disabilities in society at large and in the medical community; [10](4) the impact the lack of palliative care and support services has on suicidal ideation; [11](5) the impaired agency of persons with disabilities in dependent circumstances; [12](6) evidence of clinicians about the impact resulting from a state sanctioned paradigm shift legalizing assisted suicide and euthanasia («AS / E»); [13] and (7) the impact on the judgment of doctors of functioning in an environment of increasing health costs and budget constraint
As a result the trial record in this
proceeding is incomplete and unbalanced on crucial issues including: (1) the widespread suicidal ideation initially experienced by persons with disabilities responding to their disabilities; [8](2) relevant exploitation and
abuse to which people with disabilities and the elderly are subjected; [9](3) prejudice faced by persons with disabilities in society at large and in the medical community; [10](4) the impact the lack of palliative care and support services has on suicidal ideation; [11](5) the impaired agency of persons with disabilities in dependent circumstances; [12](6) evidence of clinicians about the impact resulting from a state sanctioned paradigm shift legalizing assisted suicide and euthanasia («
AS / E»); [13] and (7) the impact on the judgment of doctors of functioning in an environment of increasing health costs and budget constraint
AS / E»); [13] and (7) the impact on the judgment of doctors of functioning in an environment of increasing health costs and budget constraints.
[79] In response to perceived difficulties in demanding strict adherence to the constituent elements of res judicata, modern Canadian courts have developed the independent but related concept of
abuse of process
as a means of barring relitigation where permitting it to
proceed would offend vital principles such
as judicial economy, consistency, finality of legal disputes, and, perhaps most importantly, the integrity of the judicial decision - making process.
Yes, then AIA requires the Office to prescribe sanctions for
abuse of discovery,
abuse of process, or any other improper use of an inter partes review, such
as to harass or cause unnecessary delay or an unnecessary increase in the cost of the
proceeding.
The Court also dismissed an application by the Appellants to strike the claim
as an
abuse of process, on the ground that the negligence claim should have been brought in the original trespass
proceeding.
Situations where there has been
abuse and violence require careful assessment before
proceeding,
as safety becomes the main factor.
Because emergency jurisdiction often interferes with home state jurisdiction, and therefore can be
abused by a parent willing to make false claims about the stay - at - home parent, the courts generally treat emergency jurisdiction
as temporary jurisdiction and allow the home state to assume jurisdiction if the stay - at - home parent starts a
proceeding in the home state.
A person under the age of 21 whose care and custody have been transferred prior to such person's eighteenth birthday to a social services official or a voluntary authorized agency either
as an adjudicated
abused or neglected child or a voluntarily placed child, whose parents are deceased or where one parent is deceased and the other parent is not a person entitled to notice to the adoption
proceeding and where such official or agency consents to the adoption of such person in accordance with law.
Evidence of
abuse by a party against: the other parent of the party's child; the party's spouse; or any child residing within the party's household (including a child other than the child who is the subject of the custody or visitation
proceeding) may be considered
as a factor bearing on the welfare and best interests of the child.
Also, while I can not speculate
as to what the ultimate objectives of the Commissioner or the Bureau are, there have been rather few contested
abuse of dominance cases in Canada and so it seems reasonable that at least one reason the case is
proceeding is in an effort to generate more case law in this (in many ways unsettled) area in Canada.
A land trust is used for «escrow» purposes so that no party is able to cheat or
abuse the other in any way (i.e., from inception, the title is held by Equity Holding Corporation) and the participants are beneficiaries of the trust with their specific percentages of beneficiary interest, which percentages are used
as the basis for the division and distribution of net
proceeds on sale or upon the owner's refinance.