Prohibit the disclosure of a whistleblower's identity in a civil court proceeding or
a proceeding of an administrative tribunal.
Not exact matches
Paragraph 19
of the standard status certificate form prescribed by the Condominium Act regulations requires the condo corporation to confirm that it is not a party to a
proceeding before a court
of law, an arbitrator or
administrative tribunal.
Legal or
Administrative Proceedings or Investigations: We may disclose Personally Identifiable Information in the course of any judicial or administrative proceeding or investigation, in response to an order of a court or administrative tribunal (to the extent such disclosure is expressly authorized), in certain conditions in response to a subpoena, discovery request or other lawful proce
Administrative Proceedings or Investigations: We may disclose Personally Identifiable Information in the course
of any judicial or
administrative proceeding or investigation, in response to an order of a court or administrative tribunal (to the extent such disclosure is expressly authorized), in certain conditions in response to a subpoena, discovery request or other lawful proce
administrative proceeding or investigation, in response to an order
of a court or
administrative tribunal (to the extent such disclosure is expressly authorized), in certain conditions in response to a subpoena, discovery request or other lawful proce
administrative tribunal (to the extent such disclosure is expressly authorized), in certain conditions in response to a subpoena, discovery request or other lawful process or request.
In the
administrative tribunal setting, the sanctions or consequences
of a failure to attend can include a dismissal
of the application, or
proceeding without the participation
of the party failing to attend.
In the NPRM we would have allowed covered entities to disclose protected health information in the course
of any judicial or
administrative proceeding: (1) In response to an order
of a court or
administrative tribunal; or (2) where an individual was a party to the
proceeding and his or her medical condition or history was at issue and the disclosure was pursuant to lawful process or otherwise authorized by law.
In meeting the first test, a covered entity is considered to have received satisfactory assurances from the party seeking the information if that party demonstrates that it has made a good faith effort (such as by sending a notice to the individual's last known address) to provide written notice to the individual whose information is the subject
of the request, that the written notice included sufficient information about the
proceeding to permit the individual to raise an objection, and that the time for the individual to raise objections to the court or
administrative tribunal has elapsed and no objections were filed or any objections filed by the individual have been resolved.
(v) For purposes
of paragraph (e)(1)
of this section, a qualified protective order means, with respect to protected health information requested under paragraph (e)(1)(ii)
of this section, an order
of a court or
of an
administrative tribunal or a stipulation by the parties to the litigation or
administrative proceeding that:
In § 164.512 (e)
of the final rule, we permit covered entities to disclose protected health information in a judicial or
administrative proceeding if the request for such protected health information is made through or pursuant to an order from a court or
administrative tribunal or in response to a subpoena or discovery request from, or other lawful process by a party to the
proceeding.
(2) For the purposes
of a compensation hearing, sections 34 (3) and (4)[power to compel witnesses and order disclosure], 48 [maintenance
of order at hearings] and 49 [contempt
proceeding for uncooperative witness or other person]
of the
Administrative Tribunals Act apply to the compensation committee.