Not exact matches
The ACCC instituted
proceedings against Nexans SA, Prysmian and Viscas
Corporation in relation to the price fixing and exclusionary arrangement provisions of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (now the Competition and Consumer Act 2010).
The ACCC has instituted
proceedings against Yazaki
Corporation and its Australian subsidiary, Australian Arrow Pty Ltd..
Jax Arnold at In Competition has had fun with the ACCC's latest
proceedings against Australian Egg
Corporation Limited, discussing the «egg - citing» news out of the Federal Court relating to the ACCC's allegations of an «Eggsplosive» cartel attempt.
The ACCC today filed a Notice of Appeal from the Federal Court's decision dismissing the ACCC's
proceedings against the Australian Egg
Corporation Ltd and others, which commenced in May 2014.
Given the significant increase in the number of new condominium developments in Ontario, it is not surprising that there has been a corresponding increase in the number of «compliance»
proceedings commenced by condominium
corporations against defaulting owner (s).
In a recent case (Wu v. PSCC 826, 2018 ONSC 2027), a condominium unit owner commenced legal
proceedings against the condominium
corporation over concerns about board election irregularities and proxy...
Together with the Industrial Development
Corporation, First Quantum brought arbitration
proceedings against the DRC in early 2010.
In a prior blog post we reported about a unit owner, Mr. Lahrkamp, who had engaged in more than a dozen legal
proceedings against his condominium
corporation over approximately ten years.
On the other hand, we do not believe that scheduled mediations between a
corporation and an owner or between two corporations (i.e., a shared facility dispute) would need to be disclosed in a status certificate, as these are not «proceedings» that could lead to any judgment being ordered against the C
corporation and an owner or between two
corporations (i.e., a shared facility dispute) would need to be disclosed in a status certificate, as these are not «
proceedings» that could lead to any judgment being ordered
against the
CorporationCorporation.
In a recent case (Wu v. PSCC 826, 2018 ONSC 2027), a condominium unit owner commenced legal
proceedings against the condominium
corporation over concerns about board election irregularities and proxy improprieties.
In a recent case (Wu v. PSCC 826, 2018 ONSC 2027), a condominium unit owner commenced legal
proceedings against the condominium
corporation over conce...
In 2009 the
Corporation filed liens
against the owners» units and subsequently commenced power of sale
proceedings.
Mr Tamiz, who claimed to have been defamed by comments posted on the «London Muslim Blog» between 28 and 30 April 2011, appealed a decision in the court below to decline jurisdiction in his claim
against the respondent
corporation and to set aside an order for service of
proceedings on Google out of the jurisdiction.
This is a similar system of sorts devised for home builders and consumers by builders via TARION Warranty
Corporation, designed to remedy consumer complaints
against builders in order to avoid court
proceedings.
123 (1) Subject to subsection (2), all information supplied and all records and things produced to the real estate council, a hearing committee, the superintendent, the insurance
corporation or the compensation fund
corporation with respect to a licensee, a former licensee or an applicant for a licence are privileged to the same extent as if they were supplied or produced in
proceedings in a court, and no action may be brought
against a person as a consequence of the person having supplied or produced them.
(1) Subject to (2), all information supplied and all records and things produced to the real estate council, a hearing committee, the superintendent, the insurance
corporation or the compensation fund
corporation with respect to a licensee, a former licensee or an applicant for a licence are privileged to the same extent as if they were supplied or produced in
proceedings in a court, and no action may be brought
against a person as a consequence of the person having supplied or produced them.