Not exact matches
[65] There are indeed many decisions of this Court and the Court of Appeal,
under the FLA and its
predecessors, holding that a spouse who has already commenced
proceedings and obtained orders in a foreign court should generally not be permitted to bring separate
proceedings in British Columbia addressing the same dispute.
The basis for the sanctions was that plaintiffs advanced a frivolous interpretation of «
predecessor in interest» language in a release
under a prior settlement stipulation in other
proceedings.
It was swayed by the fact that sanctioned plaintiffs presented a plausible interpretation of «
predecessors in interest»
under the prior settlement stipulation given that the defendants interpreting otherwise were not involved in the prior
proceedings.