Sentences with phrase «process transcends»

But when you are selling something that you believe in and know people will enjoy or find useful / instructive then the process transcends merely selling.
This process transcends the win loss record of the team and looks at individual development and overall quality of the experience.
Any entity, thus intervening in processes transcending itself, is said to be functioning as an «object».
But if we say that we need to keep the concept of «things» as a recognition of processes transcending our conceptual forms, and if we also allow that we have no direct knowledge of the intrinsic nature of these processes, we shall have to ask whether we are forced to try to conceive of them in concepts drawn by analogy from interpretations of experience.10
We must, rather, understand the forward movement of Christianity to be a truly negative or self - emptying process, a process simultaneously negating both the Word and world which it embodies, and therefore a process transcending and moving beyond the initial expressions of its own movement.
These powerful works, including unabashed nudes, self - portraits, and dense woodland scenes, honor the simple nature of being and in the process transcend the ordinary.
It comes from a long history of art making: Images, ideas, materials, techniques and processes transcend time, place and culture.

Not exact matches

True innovators transcend both formal corporate innovation processes and mere random guessing.
These crudities and imperfections play their part in the process of revelation, in the act of being transcended by something higher.
Now, this seems to be a perfect example of a self - transcending and self - sufficient process.
For our own age, overly captivated by abstraction, the task of philosophical reflection is often to reverse the process and recover living experience» living experience of God, who transcends our human conceptions and confronts us as a philosophy - defying Other even as He addresses us and makes Himself available to us.
actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang
In reply, it might be answered that the distinction between a higher and a lower stage is an abstraction, since in process concretely taken, there is only the self - transcending process without a lower and a higher stage.
It could, it might be argued, precisely because it is of the nature of this process to transcend itself.
Circumcision emphasizes, even as it also restricts and transcends, the natural and the generative, sanctifying them in the process: Under God's command, men willingly produce in their living and generational flesh the mark of their longing for God, of their desire for His benevolence and care.
This primordial aspect of God is eternal and essentially transcends the temporal process.
Spirit, personality, community individuality, psychical qualities, organic processes, each in its own way manifests a More, a novelty in quality and in structure by which it transcends its antecedents.
When evolution produces an intelligent social being on the order of homo sapiens, it thereby brings into existence a creature equipped with the intellectual resources to enter into the realm of communication process in a way that enables it to transcend the historical concreteness of its particular spatiotemporal context of existence.
The viability of abstraction as a process that transcends the limits of experiential concreta follows by a transcendental argument from the possibility of communication — to the «conditions under which alone» communication is possible.
And this means that the instrumentalities by which the process of communication works must transcend the limits of their historical foothold.
Both the prophetic tradition as renewed in Protestantism and process thought remind us that justice is always to be transcended, that it is always to be gone «beyond.»
In this way both Zen and process thought transcend the infamous subject - object dichotomy.
The process of communication is not simply a bipolar one between the publisher and his public, but is a triadic one involving also the controlling reality of truth, which transcends the participants and transforms the relationship between them.
The third is that the process of communication is not simply a bipolar one between the publisher and his public, but is a triadic one involving also the controlling reality of truth, which transcends the participants and transforms the relationship between them.
Our point here is that consciousness and the mind — something that is non-physical, that transcends the physical, that is wondrous in itself — somehow develops from physical processes.
Niebuhr distinguished several levels of the self's freedom: (1) There is the self's awareness of transcending the natural process, of standing outside of nature.
She says, «The type of immortality which a process conceptuality suggests is subjective, retaining the living experience of the entity, but it transcends personality... «11 And she adds,»... the boundaries of personality have been left far behind as pertinent solely to finite existence in the temporal world.
But man who is a later product of the process far transcends the animal with the possession of self - consciousness and rational powers.
The question, therefore, is whether such a concept of a cause to which the infinite reality of pure act belongs as a factor constituting it without becoming an intrinsic constituent of the entity of the finite cause itself, but in some way remains free, detached from the process of becoming, but provides the real ground of the self - transcending operation of the finite agent itself, is a valid and demonstrable concept, or only a paradoxical and intrinsically self - contradictory construction which can only conceal the fact that our thought has reached an impasse.
To complicate matters, there are fans of rationalistic and speculative forms of process thought who dwell on how process metaphysics, including God, transcend any particular history, reading Whitehead and Hartshorne as though they were old historicists, like Paul Tillich.
That God transcends creation — He is a thing apart; He wanted His creation and made it a gradual process, and He made it good; we're made in His image and likeness and we're very good; on the seventh day, God rests and creation basks in His delight.
Process thinker Francis G. Baur has suggested that the concept of «thresholds» of change beyond which a phenomenon is new in ways that transcend and fulfill its antecedents, but does not cease thereby to be in process towards other previously unimaginable dimensions of being, might mediate at this point between biblical eschatology and process - relational cosmology.6 After all, the eschaton is the completion of God's will for this cosmic epoch, but it is not implied in scripture that there is no life beyond esProcess thinker Francis G. Baur has suggested that the concept of «thresholds» of change beyond which a phenomenon is new in ways that transcend and fulfill its antecedents, but does not cease thereby to be in process towards other previously unimaginable dimensions of being, might mediate at this point between biblical eschatology and process - relational cosmology.6 After all, the eschaton is the completion of God's will for this cosmic epoch, but it is not implied in scripture that there is no life beyond esprocess towards other previously unimaginable dimensions of being, might mediate at this point between biblical eschatology and process - relational cosmology.6 After all, the eschaton is the completion of God's will for this cosmic epoch, but it is not implied in scripture that there is no life beyond esprocess - relational cosmology.6 After all, the eschaton is the completion of God's will for this cosmic epoch, but it is not implied in scripture that there is no life beyond eschaton.
The phenomenon of subception discussed by Rogers and selective inattention reported by H. S. Sullivan demonstrate that it is possible for the organism as a whole to conform to or experience events that the higher conscious processes will fail to detect.23 Hence, the inhibiting and habit - ridden structures of consciousness are transcended by perception in the adverbial mode.
In a recent issue of the journal Behavior there are two articles (Baker 1973; Dawkins 1973) making positive use of one feature of process philosophy, its concept of creative novelty transcending causal determinateness other than statistical.
Indeed, Mathews believed «that there is nothing more fundamental and elemental than processes; nothing transcends or undergirds processes.
It is true that what will happen in the next moment is determined in large part by the previous and present state of things actualized; but each new moment, according to process thought, is also open to the infinite range of possibilities contained in the PN of God, which transcend the limited possibilities contained in previous actual states.
A new actuality always arises out of a given world that «condition [s] the creativity which transcends [it]» (Whitehead, Process 43).
Now «attention is captivated primarily by the historical - factual process that does not transcend the times but is entangled with them in all sorts of ways.»
They do not transcend the boundary of historical process.
new factor which is proper to us human beings allows us to transcend the process of material causality.»
This purely material process can not account for an animal that transcends its material environment and therefore stands over the process of material causality.
Surely it can not mean that the self - giving of God revealed in Jesus Christ consisted in God's becoming «incarnate,» as an act of condescension, as though God as he is in himself is a being who basically exists apart from the world of process (and thereby fundamentally transcends history), and who out of mercy became immanent and took on human form.
The new factor which is proper to us human beings allows us to transcend the process of material causality: it means that we are not determined by our material environment.
It follows then that that which occasions a duration to be what it is must be some thing or process which, in some sense remaining to be specified, transcends nature.
The societies by which we are judged are often self - transcending, and sometimes the process of self - transcendence does not stop until the total community of being is reached.
Can the religious show the slightest evidence of anything transcending simple natural processes?
We must of course make a special exception for human life, which transcends this evolutionary process in a far more radical way.
End - to - end support for your logistics processes — support that precedes the warehouse and transcends the warehouse.
When mental processes are seen as transcending the body, society perceives people as «more independent and self - motivated than they truly are,» and that minimizes «the connections that bind us to each other and to the environment around us,» Jasanoff writes.
In an effort to encourage open participation in a science storytelling process that transcends the individual science writer and the individual science blog, this project also embodies an «open notebook» approach to in - depth science reporting.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z