Sentences with phrase «produce global cooling»

According to theoretical calculations at Atmoz, TSI would need to fall to 1347.65 W / m2 to produce a global cooling of 0.6 °C.

Yes, but man - made CO2 does NOT produce global cooling.

produced a global temperature rise of a little less than + 0.05 degrees Celsius, while the so far much shorter La Nina dominated years (starting a little after 1990, roughly) produced a global cooling that now stands at — 0.2 degrees Celsius.

Not exact matches

But after crunching some Department of Energy data, Surace estimates that the construction and operation of buildings — heating; cooling; lighting; the manufacture of cement, drywall, and glass — produce 52 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions.

Changes in the number of cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere due to changes in solar activity can not explain global warming, as average cosmic ray intensities have been increasing since 1985 even as the world has warmed — the opposite of what should happen if cosmic rays produce climate - cooling clouds.

The deadliest volcanoes on earth are called supervolcanoes, capable of producing cataclysmic eruptions that devastate huge regions, and cause global cooling of the climate.

(see Graphic) The eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines two years ago produced a cooling of the planet that «may be the largest global climate perturbation of the century», according to a new assessment by the American climatologist James Hansen.

The net effect of human - generated aerosols is more complicated and regionally variable — for example, in contrast to the local warming effect of the Asian Brown Cloud, global shipping produces large amounts of cooling reflective sulphate aerosols: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990820022710.htm

On the other hand, decreasing stratospheric ozone (above 25 km), increasing stratospheric water vapor, and increasing atmospheric CO2 uniformly with height) will produce global surface and tropospheric warming along with stratospheric cooling.

Anyway, all that sulfate, once in the stratosphere, will certainly produce some cooling, partially masking the warming from excess global warming (so - called greenhouse) gases.

Previously, the claim was that satellites (in particular the MSU 2LT record produced by UAH) showed a global cooling that was not apparent in the surface temperatures or model runs.

Except that GHG forcing + cooling aerosol forcing results in less precipitation globally in general than reduced GHG forcing that produces the same global average temperature, as found in «Climate Change Methadone» elsewhere at RC.

In response, here's a link to a less - than - a-minute slide show with Chinese text that features images of my actual foot (produced last year as a Public Service Announcement to raise awareness about humanity's global ecological footprint; plus the music's kinda cool, too):

Interestingly, the paper «Climate Trends and Global food production since 1980» (Lobell, Schlenker, Costa - Roberts, in Sciencexpress, 5 May, Science 1204531) confirms my finding of the absence of climate change in the USA: «A notable exception to the [global] warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 % of global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&rGlobal food production since 1980» (Lobell, Schlenker, Costa - Roberts, in Sciencexpress, 5 May, Science 1204531) confirms my finding of the absence of climate change in the USA: «A notable exception to the [global] warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 % of global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&rglobal] warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 % of global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&rglobal maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends».

The result is cooling oceans able to gradually absorb and lower atmospheric CO2, enabling restoration of albedo at higher latitude / altitude, producing further slow global cooling.

The first life might well find it convenient to feed on the still - high CO2 level, eventually creating a global - cooling crisis by consuming most of it, the opposite of the global - warming crisis we're creating by producing lots of CO2.

Flashback 1975 New York Times: Climate Experts Said That Jumbo Jets Would Cool The Planet And Produce Global Famine

The fact that ARGO sampling pretty much misses out one of the fastest warming regions in the world while having no such deficiencies in regions of cooling means any analysis using only ARGO data will produce trends lower than the true global average, unless the analysis somehow accounts for this bias.

When that Arctic forcing is SST related, it would be lagged and could be out of phase meaning a global cooling or pause would produce stronger Arctic Winter Warming and stronger more frequent SSW events.

During this two - week transition period, any water vapor excess (or deficit) relative to the equilibrium distribution did of course produce a radiative greenhouse heating (or cooling) effect, but this «virtual forcing» was very transient in nature, without any lasting impact on the global temperature.

«Key Points ■ Models run with human forcing can produce 10 - year periods with little warming» Global warming ended after 1998 and the Earth has been cooling since 2002.

For example, under the ranges stated by the IPCC, the world might well have cooled 0.1 degrees over the six decades — greenhouses gasses could have produced 0.5 degrees of warming and aerosols -0.6 degrees — and Nuccitelli would still be worrying about global warming.

As a result, the NASA / GISS climate agency has shown their amazing «scientific» capabilities by producing an enhanced global warming trend... by simply, and literally, lowering (ie, cooling) past recorded temperatures prior to 1960.

Fabricating fake temperatures is often used to describe the massive amount of adjustments (manipulations) made to temperature datasets, be they modern instrumental or paleo proxy reconstructions.The major climate agencies and climate scientists across the world have claimed that global warming is «unequivocal» yet they are conducting a constant revisionism of historical temperatures to produce faux warming, or if need be, false cooling when needed.

Backing that up, NASA says that 1) sea surface temperature fluctuations (El Niño - La Niña) can cause global temperature deviation of about 0.2 °C; 2) solar maximums and minimums produce variations of only 0.1 °C, warmer or cooler; 3) aerosols from natural sources such as volcanic eruptions (Mount Pinatubo for example) have caused average cooling of 0.3 °C, but recent eruptions have had not had significant effect.